Suppr超能文献

当学习者精力耗尽时,通过详尽提问进行学习是否不那么可取?

Is Learning With Elaborative Interrogation Less Desirable When Learners Are Depleted?

作者信息

Kühl Tim, Bertrams Alex

机构信息

Psychology of Education, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

Educational Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 29;10:707. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00707. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

When learning with elaborative interrogation, learners are requested by means of prompts to generate parts of the study material. There is evidence, that learning with elaborative interrogation is beneficial. However, it is conceivable that for elaborative interrogation to be beneficial for learning, learners also need resources available to be able to correctly generate parts of the study material. In this connection, one potentially important factor for successfully carrying out such effortful analytic processes, like generating information, is cognitive self-control. However, self-control seems to be a limited resource that can be depleted. Hence, under conditions of depleted self-regulatory resources (ego depletion), elaborative interrogation might lead to an incomplete generation of the requested information, resulting in incomplete study material. Thus, elaborative interrogation may be only beneficial under nondepleted conditions, but disadvantageous under depleted conditions. To investigate this, 97 persons were randomly assigned to one of four conditions resulting from a 2 × 2 between-subjects design with the independent variables ego depletion (yes vs. no) and learning condition (elaborative interrogation vs. control). Ego depletion was manipulated with a writing task: Participants were instructed to transcribe a text on a blank sheet, but only participants in the depletion condition were instructed to omit the letters and wherever they would normally appear in their writing. For the elaborative interrogation condition, some segments of the regular text were removed and prompts asking for that particular information were provided. For the control condition, the regular text was provided while no prompts were given. The main dependent variables were the learning outcome measures of a retention test and a transfer test. 2 × 2-ANCOVAs showed no effects of ego depletion, no effects of learning condition and no interaction between ego depletion and learning condition - neither for retention nor for transfer. The concept of ego depletion is recently discussed controversy and these results do contribute to the skeptical view that queries the impact of the concept of ego depletion - at least for cognitive tasks. Moreover, these results question whether elaborative interrogation are also desirable when assessing learning outcomes by means of retention and transfer tests.

摘要

在使用精细提问法学习时,学习者会通过提示被要求生成部分学习材料。有证据表明,使用精细提问法学习是有益的。然而,可以想象的是,为了使精细提问法对学习有益,学习者还需要有可用资源,以便能够正确生成部分学习材料。在这方面,成功执行诸如生成信息等费力的分析过程的一个潜在重要因素是认知自我控制。然而,自我控制似乎是一种有限的资源,可能会被耗尽。因此,在自我调节资源被耗尽(自我损耗)的情况下,精细提问法可能会导致所要求信息的生成不完整,从而产生不完整的学习材料。因此,精细提问法可能仅在未被耗尽的条件下有益,但在被耗尽的条件下则不利。为了对此进行研究,97人被随机分配到由2×2被试间设计产生的四种条件之一,自变量为自我损耗(是与否)和学习条件(精细提问法与对照组)。通过一项写作任务来操纵自我损耗:参与者被要求在一张空白纸上抄写一篇文章,但只有处于损耗条件下的参与者被要求在写作中无论何处出现字母“e”和“i”都省略掉。对于精细提问法条件,常规文本的一些部分被删除,并提供了要求提供该特定信息的提示。对于对照组,提供常规文本但不给出提示。主要因变量是一项记忆测试和一项迁移测试的学习结果测量指标。2×2协方差分析显示,自我损耗、学习条件以及自我损耗与学习条件之间均无效应——无论是对于记忆还是迁移。自我损耗的概念最近受到了争议性讨论,这些结果确实有助于支持那种对自我损耗概念的影响表示怀疑的观点——至少对于认知任务而言。此外,这些结果还质疑了在通过记忆和迁移测试评估学习结果时精细提问法是否也是可取的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8120/6449625/3ff3cd34108d/fpsyg-10-00707-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验