• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

已建立的搜索筛选器可能会在确定随机对照试验时漏掉研究。

Established search filters may miss studies when identifying randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, UK.

Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Aug;112:12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.04.002
PMID:30986533
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The authors were becoming increasingly aware of studies reporting randomized controlled trial (RCT), which reported trial phase but did not mention study design or randomization in the title or abstract. The objective of this study was to determine if established RCT literature search filters should include terms for trial phase.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

This study is a case study. A search filter for trial phase (the P3 filter) was developed, and its sensitivity, efficiency, and value were determined when compared with two established RCT literature search filters (The Cochrane Highly Sensitive Search Strategies [HSSS] and the Royle and Waugh Brief RCT Search Strategy [BRSS]) in the year 2015-improved sensitivity was determined where the P3 filter identified studies missed by either of the established filters; efficiency was determined by the number needed to read; and the Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to determine study quality as a proxy for value.

RESULTS

Both established filters missed studies. The HSSS missed one RCT and four follow-up RCT studies. The BRSS missed one RCT and five follow-up RCT studies. Study quality was unclear.

CONCLUSION

Established RCT literature search filters may miss studies where trial phase is reported instead of terms for study design or randomization. The P3 filter can be incorporated to improve sensitivity.

摘要

目的

作者越来越意识到有研究报告随机对照试验(RCT),这些研究报告了试验阶段,但在标题或摘要中没有提到研究设计或随机分组。本研究的目的是确定既定的 RCT 文献检索过滤器是否应包括试验阶段的术语。

研究设计和设置

本研究为案例研究。开发了一个用于试验阶段的搜索过滤器(P3 过滤器),并在 2015 年将其与两个既定的 RCT 文献检索过滤器(Cochrane 高度敏感搜索策略[HSSS]和 Royle 和 Waugh 简短 RCT 搜索策略[BRSS])进行比较,以确定其灵敏度、效率和价值。灵敏度通过 P3 过滤器确定了两个既定过滤器漏掉的研究来确定;效率通过需要阅读的数量来确定;Cochrane 偏倚风险工具用于确定研究质量作为价值的替代指标。

结果

两个既定的过滤器都漏掉了一些研究。HSSS 漏掉了一个 RCT 和四个后续 RCT 研究。BRSS 漏掉了一个 RCT 和五个后续 RCT 研究。研究质量不明确。

结论

既定的 RCT 文献检索过滤器可能会漏掉仅报告试验阶段而不是研究设计或随机分组术语的研究。可以纳入 P3 过滤器以提高灵敏度。

相似文献

1
Established search filters may miss studies when identifying randomized controlled trials.已建立的搜索筛选器可能会在确定随机对照试验时漏掉研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Aug;112:12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
2
Search strategies to identify observational studies in MEDLINE and Embase.在MEDLINE和Embase中识别观察性研究的检索策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 12;3(3):MR000041. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000041.pub2.
3
A simplified search strategy for identifying randomised controlled trials for systematic reviews of health care interventions: a comparison with more exhaustive strategies.一种用于识别卫生保健干预措施系统评价的随机对照试验的简化检索策略:与更详尽策略的比较
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Jul 23;5:23. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-23.
4
Which are the most sensitive search filters to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE?在 MEDLINE 中,哪些是最敏感的检索过滤器来识别随机对照试验?
J Med Libr Assoc. 2020 Oct 1;108(4):556-563. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2020.912.
5
Assessing the performance of methodological search filters to improve the efficiency of evidence information retrieval: five literature reviews and a qualitative study.评估方法学检索过滤器的性能以提高证据信息检索的效率:五项文献综述和一项定性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Nov;21(69):1-148. doi: 10.3310/hta21690.
6
Retrieving randomized controlled trials from medline: a comparison of 38 published search filters.从医学文献数据库检索随机对照试验:38种已发表的检索过滤器的比较
Health Info Libr J. 2009 Sep;26(3):187-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2008.00827.x.
7
Optimizing search strategies to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE.优化检索策略以识别MEDLINE中的随机对照试验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 May 9;6:23. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-23.
8
Electronic search strategies to identify reports of cluster randomized trials in MEDLINE: low precision will improve with adherence to reporting standards.电子检索策略在 MEDLINE 中识别群组随机对照试验报告:报告标准的依从性越高,精度越低。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Feb 16;10:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-15.
9
Cochrane Centralised Search Service showed high sensitivity identifying randomized controlled trials: A retrospective analysis.考克兰中央检索服务对识别随机对照试验具有较高的敏感性:一项回顾性分析。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Nov;127:142-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.08.008. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
10
Study filters for non-randomized studies of interventions consistently lacked sensitivity upon external validation.干预措施的非随机研究的研究筛选器在外部验证时一致性地缺乏敏感性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Dec 18;18(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0625-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Vaccines for preventing infections in adults with haematological malignancies.用于预防血液系统恶性肿瘤成人感染的疫苗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 21;5(5):CD015530. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015530.pub2.
2
Vaccines for preventing infections in adults with solid tumours.用于预防实体瘤成年患者感染的疫苗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 16;4(4):CD015551. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015551.pub2.
3
Positron emission tomography-adapted therapy for first-line treatment in adults with Hodgkin lymphoma.正电子发射断层扫描适配疗法用于成人霍奇金淋巴瘤的一线治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 26;3(3):CD010533. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010533.pub3.
4
Fluid restriction for treatment of symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants.限制液体摄入用于治疗早产儿症状性动脉导管未闭
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 18;12(12):CD015424. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015424.pub2.
5
Community-based complex interventions to sustain independence in older people, stratified by frailty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.基于社区的复杂干预措施,针对体弱老年人维持其独立性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(48):1-194. doi: 10.3310/HNRP2514.
6
Design Characteristics and Recruitment Rates for Randomized Trials of Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infection Management: A Systematic Review.人工关节周围感染管理随机试验的设计特征与招募率:一项系统综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Sep 27;12(10):1486. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12101486.
7
Indirect Comparison of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) versus Traditional Low-Frequency SCS for the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.10kHz脊髓刺激(SCS)与传统低频SCS治疗疼痛性糖尿病神经病变的间接比较:随机对照试验的系统评价
Biomedicines. 2022 Oct 19;10(10):2630. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10102630.
8
Home-built environment interventions and inflammation biomarkers: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.自建环境干预与炎症生物标志物:一项系统评价和Meta分析方案
BJGP Open. 2022 Dec 20;6(4). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0104. Print 2022 Dec.
9
Intravenous iron versus oral iron versus no iron with or without erythropoiesis- stimulating agents (ESA) for cancer patients with anaemia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.静脉铁剂与口服铁剂与无铁剂(联合或不联合红细胞生成刺激剂)治疗贫血癌症患者:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 20;6(6):CD012633. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012633.pub2.
10
The ScHARR LMIC filter: Adapting a low- and middle-income countries geographic search filter to identify studies on preterm birth prevention and management.ScHARR LMIC 筛选器:改造中低收入国家地理搜索筛选器,以识别预防和管理早产的研究。
Res Synth Methods. 2022 Jul;13(4):447-456. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1552. Epub 2022 Feb 26.