a Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences , Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Center , Nashville , TN , USA.
Int J Audiol. 2019 Jun;58(6):363-372. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1580390. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of signal processing strategy on speech understanding and auditory function for adult cochlear implant (CI) users with a focus on the effects of sequential versus paired stimulation.
Within-subjects, repeated measures design was utilised to compare performance between processing strategies and stimulation type on various measures of auditory function and subjective sound quality. Testing with subsequent strategies was completed after a total familiarisation time of two weeks.
Ten post-lingually deafened adult CI users were recruited from a clinical population. Participants had a minimum of 13 months CI experience. Ages ranged from 25-78 years. All participants had long-term experience with the optima strategy; eight with sequential stimulation and two with paired stimulation.
We found no statistically significant effect of processing strategy. We observed an effect of stimulation type with sequential stimulation yielding significantly higher performance than paired stimulation for speech understanding in quiet and in noise, and subjective estimates of sound quality. No significant differences were noted across strategy or stimulation for music perception, spectral resolution or temporal resolution.
Many patients utilise paired stimulation - the default stimulation type in the clinical software; however, sequential stimulation yielded significantly higher outcomes on multiple measures.
本研究旨在探讨信号处理策略对成人人工耳蜗(CI)使用者言语理解和听觉功能的影响,重点关注顺序刺激与成对刺激的影响。
采用自身对照、重复测量的设计方法,比较处理策略和刺激类型对各种听觉功能和主观音质测量的影响。在两周的总熟悉期后,对后续策略进行测试。
从临床人群中招募了 10 名后天失聪的成年人工耳蜗使用者。参与者的人工耳蜗使用经验至少为 13 个月。年龄范围为 25-78 岁。所有参与者均具有长期使用 optima 策略的经验;8 名患者采用顺序刺激,2 名患者采用成对刺激。
我们没有发现处理策略有统计学上的显著影响。我们观察到刺激类型的影响,顺序刺激在安静和噪声环境下的言语理解以及主观音质评估方面的表现明显优于成对刺激。在音乐感知、频谱分辨率和时间分辨率方面,策略或刺激之间没有显著差异。
许多患者使用成对刺激——临床软件中的默认刺激类型;然而,顺序刺激在多项测量中产生了更高的结果。