• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

间歇性跛行患者的疼痛管理和身体活动患者教育(PrEPAID)的效果和可行性:一项随机对照试验的方案。

Efficacy and Feasibility of Pain management and Patient Education for Physical Activity in Intermittent claudication (PrEPAID): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Centre for Living, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.

Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science and Technology, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu, Nigeria.

出版信息

Trials. 2019 Apr 16;20(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3307-6.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-019-3307-6
PMID:30992033
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6469131/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physical activity (PA) improves functional capacity and quality of life and provides secondary prevention benefits in individuals with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and intermittent claudication (IC). However, pain and patient lack of knowledge are key barriers to the uptake of, and adherence to, PA recommendations. This trial will test the efficacy and feasibility of a non-invasive pain management intervention with and without patient education to improve PA in individuals with PAD and IC.

METHODS

This is a randomised, controlled assessor-blinded feasibility trial with four parallel groups. Eighty adults with PAD and IC will be randomly assigned 1:1:1:1 to Active TENS (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation), Placebo TENS, Active TENS + Patient education or Placebo TENS + Patient education groups. All groups will continue to receive usual care over the intervention period. Participants randomised to Active TENS will receive a TENS device (preset at 120 Hz, 200 μs) and will be instructed to use the device daily at home or elsewhere for 6 weeks with a patient-determined intensity of "strong but comfortable". Placebo TENS group participants will receive the same model of TENS device and instructions for use as those in the active group, except that the stimulation dose will be safely altered to produce non-therapeutic, ineffective stimulation. Participants randomised to patient education will receive a one-off 3-h workshop of structured group education (four to five persons in each group) and three sets of twice-weekly phone calls. Efficacy outcomes will be assessed at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention and at 3 months follow-up. Absolute claudication distance using the Gardner treadmill protocol will be assessed as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes will assess initial claudication distance, daily PA and patient-reported outcomes including quality of life, pain self-efficacy, depression, disease perception and walking impairment pain intensity and quality. Feasibility outcomes will assess rates of recruitment, retention and adherence. Focus groups with participants at the end of the trial will explore the acceptability of the interventions.

DISCUSSION

This trial will determine the efficacy and feasibility of using a low-cost, CE-marked non-invasive pain management modality delivered with or without a patient-centred education intervention to improve PA in individuals with PAD and IC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03204825 . Registered on 2 July 2017.

摘要

背景

体力活动(PA)可改善功能能力和生活质量,并为外周动脉疾病(PAD)和间歇性跛行(IC)患者提供二级预防益处。然而,疼痛和患者缺乏知识是接受和坚持 PA 建议的关键障碍。本试验将测试一种非侵入性疼痛管理干预措施,结合和不结合患者教育,以改善 PAD 和 IC 患者的 PA 的疗效和可行性。

方法

这是一项随机、对照、评估者盲法的可行性试验,有四个平行组。80 名 PAD 和 IC 成人将被随机分配 1:1:1:1 至主动经皮神经电刺激(TENS)、安慰剂 TENS、主动 TENS + 患者教育或安慰剂 TENS + 患者教育组。所有组将在干预期间继续接受常规护理。随机分配至主动 TENS 组的参与者将接受 TENS 设备(预设 120Hz,200μs),并将被指示每天在家或其他地方使用该设备 6 周,使用患者确定的“强但舒适”强度。安慰剂 TENS 组参与者将接受与主动组相同型号的 TENS 设备和使用说明,只是刺激剂量将被安全地改变以产生非治疗性、无效的刺激。随机分配至患者教育组的参与者将接受一次 3 小时的结构化小组教育(每组 4-5 人)和三次每周两次的电话随访。疗效结果将在基线、干预 6 周后和 3 个月随访时进行评估。使用 Gardner 跑步机方案评估绝对跛行距离作为主要结局。次要结局将评估初始跛行距离、日常 PA 和患者报告的结果,包括生活质量、疼痛自我效能、抑郁、疾病感知和行走障碍疼痛强度和质量。可行性结局将评估招募、保留和依从性的发生率。试验结束时的焦点小组将探讨干预措施的可接受性。

讨论

本试验将确定使用低成本、CE 标记的非侵入性疼痛管理方式与或不与以患者为中心的教育干预相结合,以改善 PAD 和 IC 患者 PA 的疗效和可行性。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT03204825。于 2017 年 7 月 2 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bf5/6469131/a6422e1ceecd/13063_2019_3307_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bf5/6469131/78235c9f3262/13063_2019_3307_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bf5/6469131/a6422e1ceecd/13063_2019_3307_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bf5/6469131/78235c9f3262/13063_2019_3307_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bf5/6469131/a6422e1ceecd/13063_2019_3307_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and Feasibility of Pain management and Patient Education for Physical Activity in Intermittent claudication (PrEPAID): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.间歇性跛行患者的疼痛管理和身体活动患者教育(PrEPAID)的效果和可行性:一项随机对照试验的方案。
Trials. 2019 Apr 16;20(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3307-6.
2
The efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the improvement of walking distance in patients with peripheral arterial disease with intermittent claudication: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial: the TENS-PAD study.经皮电神经刺激对改善间歇性跛行的外周动脉疾病患者步行距离的疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案:TENS-PAD研究
Trials. 2017 Aug 10;18(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1997-1.
3
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Improves Walking Performance in Patients With Intermittent Claudication.经皮电神经刺激改善间歇性跛行患者的行走能力。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):323-30. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000258.
4
The development and pilot randomised controlled trial of a group education programme for promoting walking in people with intermittent claudication.一项用于促进间歇性跛行患者行走的团体教育计划的开发及初步随机对照试验
Vasc Med. 2015 Aug;20(4):348-57. doi: 10.1177/1358863X15577857. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
5
Cross-sectoral rehabilitation intervention for patients with intermittent claudication versus usual care for patients in non-operative management - the CIPIC Rehab Study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.跨部门间歇性跛行康复干预与非手术治疗患者常规护理的比较 - CIPIC Rehab 研究:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jan 21;21(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-4032-x.
6
WalkingPad protocol: a randomized clinical trial of behavioral and motivational intervention added to smartphone-enabled supervised home-based exercise in patients with peripheral arterial disease and intermittent claudication.WalkingPad 方案:一项在伴有外周动脉疾病和间歇性跛行的患者中,将行为和动机干预措施添加到基于智能手机的家庭监督运动中的随机临床试验。
Trials. 2022 Apr 18;23(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06279-9.
7
Challenges in recruitment and adherence to a randomized clinical trial in Brazil on the effects of transcutaneous nervous electrical stimulation on individuals with peripheral arterial disease: A feasibility study.巴西一项关于经皮神经电刺激对周围动脉疾病患者影响的随机临床试验在招募和依从性方面的挑战:一项可行性研究。
J Vasc Nurs. 2020 Dec;38(4):164-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
8
The Effect of Structured Patient Education on Physical Activity in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Intermittent Claudication: A Systematic Review.结构化患者教育对周围动脉疾病和间歇性跛行患者身体活动的影响:一项系统评价。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Jul;54(1):58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 May 18.
9
Motivating Structured walking Activity in people with Intermittent Claudication (MOSAIC): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a physiotherapist-led, behavioural change intervention versus usual care in adults with intermittent claudication.激励间歇性跛行患者进行结构化步行活动(MOSAIC):一项针对成年间歇性跛行患者的随机对照试验方案,该试验对比由物理治疗师主导的行为改变干预与常规护理。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 24;9(8):e030002. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030002.
10
Efficacy of brief behavioral counselling by allied health professionals to promote physical activity in people with peripheral arterial disease (BIPP): study protocol for a multi-center randomized controlled trial.专职医疗人员进行的简短行为咨询对促进外周动脉疾病患者身体活动的效果(BIPP):一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2016 Nov 9;16(1):1148. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3801-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Pain management and patient education interventions to increase physical activity in people with intermittent claudication (PrEPAID): a feasibility randomised controlled trial in the UK.疼痛管理与患者教育干预以增加间歇性跛行患者的身体活动(PrEPAID):英国一项可行性随机对照试验
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 22;15(7):e105563. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105563.
2
Behaviour change interventions to promote physical activity in people with intermittent claudication: the OPTIMA systematic review.促进间歇性跛行患者身体活动的行为改变干预措施:OPTIMA系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(18):1-142. doi: 10.3310/ZBNG5240.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Living a burdensome and demanding life: A qualitative systematic review of the patients experiences of peripheral arterial disease.过着负担沉重且要求苛刻的生活:一项定性系统评价外周动脉疾病患者的体验。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 15;13(11):e0207456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207456. eCollection 2018.
2
Barriers and enablers to walking in individuals with intermittent claudication: A systematic review to conceptualize a relevant and patient-centered program.间歇性跛行患者行走的障碍和促进因素:系统综述以概念化相关和以患者为中心的方案。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 26;13(7):e0201095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201095. eCollection 2018.
3
Preconditioning Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Patients with Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease.
神经肌肉电刺激对有症状的外周动脉疾病患者的预处理作用
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2025 Aug 1;32(8):1027-1037. doi: 10.5551/jat.65490. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
4
Timed Up and Go test score and factors associated with a moderate-to-high risk of future falls in patients scheduled for vascular surgeries-a cross-sectional study.计时起立行走测试评分与接受血管手术患者未来发生中高度跌倒风险相关因素的横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 21;12:1363828. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1363828. eCollection 2024.
5
A Multicenter, Investigator-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Calf Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Program on Walking Performance in Peripheral Artery Disease: The ELECTRO-PAD Study Protocol.一项多中心、研究者设盲、随机对照试验,旨在评估小腿神经肌肉电刺激方案对周围动脉疾病患者步行能力的疗效:ELECTRO-PAD研究方案
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 7;11(24):7261. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247261.
6
Continuity of Nursing Care in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review.冠心病患者的护理连续性:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 4;19(5):3000. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19053000.
Understanding the Intention-to-treat Principle in Randomized Controlled Trials.
理解随机对照试验中的意向性分析原则。
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;18(6):1075-1078. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.8.35985. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
4
The Effect of Structured Patient Education on Physical Activity in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Intermittent Claudication: A Systematic Review.结构化患者教育对周围动脉疾病和间歇性跛行患者身体活动的影响:一项系统评价。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Jul;54(1):58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 May 18.
5
The fate of patients with intermittent claudication in the 21st century revisited - results from the CAVASIC Study.21 世纪间歇性跛行患者的命运再探讨——CAVASIC 研究结果。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 3;8:45833. doi: 10.1038/srep45833.
6
Pathophysiology of Intermittent Claudication in Peripheral Artery Disease.外周动脉疾病间歇性跛行的病理生理学
Circ J. 2017 Feb 24;81(3):281-289. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1286. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
7
2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2016 AHA/ACC 指南:下肢外周动脉疾病患者管理——美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告。
Circulation. 2017 Mar 21;135(12):e726-e779. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000471. Epub 2016 Nov 13.
8
CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials.《CONSORT 2010声明:随机试点和可行性试验的扩展》
BMJ. 2016 Oct 24;355:i5239. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5239.
9
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Improves Walking Performance in Patients With Intermittent Claudication.经皮电神经刺激改善间歇性跛行患者的行走能力。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):323-30. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000258.
10
The Risk of Disease Progression in Peripheral Arterial Disease is Higher than Expected: A Meta-Analysis of Mortality and Disease Progression in Peripheral Arterial Disease.外周动脉疾病的疾病进展风险高于预期:一项外周动脉疾病死亡率和疾病进展的荟萃分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016 Mar;51(3):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.10.022. Epub 2016 Jan 6.