Abaraogu U O, Dall P M, Seenan C A
School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK; Department of Medical Rehabilitation, University of Nigeria Enugu Campus Enugu, Nigeria.
School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Jul;54(1):58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 May 18.
The aim was review the components and effects of patient education interventions to improve physical activity (PA) in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and intermittent claudication (IC), and patients' experiences of these interventions.
CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Ovid, ProQuest, AMED, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, and PEDRO, and Trial registers and directory of Open Access repository websites and Web of science conference proceedings were searched. Hand searching of reference lists of identified studies was also performed to identify studies that reported the effect of patient education interventions on daily PA and/or walking capacity in individuals with PAD and IC, or studies investigating patients' experiences of such interventions.
A systematic search was conducted in June 2016 (updated in March 2017). Primary outcomes were daily step count and self reported PA; the secondary outcome was absolute claudication distance. There was substantial heterogeneity in terms of modalities of patient education in the included studies; hence a narrative synthesis was implemented.
Six studies (1087 participants) were included in the review. Findings from a small number of high quality trials demonstrated potential for PA improvement with structured education interventions. Nevertheless, evidence is currently inconclusive regarding the effect on daily PA and walking capacity of patients with IC. Patients reported that they valued the interventions studied, finding them acceptable and important in improving their PA, motivating and empowering them to self manage their condition.
The evidence from the review is limited and inconclusive regarding the effectiveness of structured education for increasing PA in patients with PAD and IC. More rigorous trials are needed before recommendations can be made. Future interventions should consider the key criteria for a structured patient education programme, and also report patients' experiences and perceptions.
旨在回顾患者教育干预措施的组成部分及其对改善外周动脉疾病(PAD)和间歇性跛行(IC)患者身体活动(PA)的效果,以及患者对这些干预措施的体验。
检索了CINAHL、Cochrane图书馆、Ovid、ProQuest、AMED、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Web of Science核心合集和PEDRO,以及试验注册库、开放获取知识库网站目录和Web of science会议论文集。还对已识别研究的参考文献列表进行了手工检索,以识别报告患者教育干预措施对PAD和IC患者日常PA和/或步行能力影响的研究,或调查患者对此类干预措施体验的研究。
于2016年6月进行了系统检索(2017年3月更新)。主要结局为每日步数和自我报告的PA;次要结局为绝对跛行距离。纳入研究中患者教育方式存在很大异质性;因此进行了叙述性综合分析。
该综述纳入了6项研究(1087名参与者)。少数高质量试验的结果表明,结构化教育干预措施有改善PA的潜力。然而,目前关于对IC患者日常PA和步行能力的影响的证据尚无定论。患者报告称,他们重视所研究的干预措施,认为这些措施在改善PA方面是可接受且重要的,能激励并使他们有能力自我管理病情。
关于结构化教育对增加PAD和IC患者PA有效性的综述证据有限且尚无定论。在提出建议之前,需要进行更严格的试验。未来的干预措施应考虑结构化患者教育计划的关键标准,同时报告患者的体验和看法。