Suppr超能文献

护士或牧师主导的尊严疗法用于老年癌症姑息治疗门诊患者:一项随机对照试验方案

Dignity Therapy Led by Nurses or Chaplains for Elderly Cancer Palliative Care Outpatients: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Kittelson Sheri, Scarton Lisa, Barker Paige, Hauser Joshua, O'Mahony Sean, Rabow Michael, Delgado Guay Marvin, Quest Tammie E, Emanuel Linda, Fitchett George, Handzo George, Yao Yingewi, Chochinov Harvey Max, Wilkie Diana

机构信息

Center for Palliative Care Research and Education, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

Center for Palliative Care Research and Education, College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Apr 17;8(4):e12213. doi: 10.2196/12213.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our goal is to improve psychosocial and spiritual care outcomes for elderly patients with cancer by optimizing an intervention focused on dignity conservation tasks such as settling relationships, sharing words of love, and preparing a legacy document. These tasks are central needs for elderly patients with cancer. Dignity therapy (DT) has clear feasibility but inconsistent efficacy. DT could be led by nurses or chaplains, the 2 disciplines within palliative care that may be most available to provide this intervention; however, it remains unclear how best it can work in real-life settings.

OBJECTIVE

We propose a randomized clinical trial whose aims are to (1) compare groups receiving usual palliative care for elderly patients with cancer or usual palliative care with DT for effects on (a) patient outcomes (dignity impact, existential tasks, and cancer prognosis awareness); and (b) processes of delivering palliative spiritual care services (satisfaction and unmet spiritual needs); and (2) explore the influence of physical symptoms and spiritual distress on the outcome effects (dignity impact and existential tasks) of usual palliative care and nurse- or chaplain-led DT. We hypothesize that, controlling for pretest scores, each of the DT groups will have higher scores on the dignity impact and existential task measures than the usual care group; each of the DT groups will have better peaceful awareness and treatment preference more consistent with their cancer prognosis than the usual care group. We also hypothesize that physical symptoms and spiritual distress will significantly affect intervention effects.

METHODS

We are conducting a 3-arm, pre- and posttest, randomized, controlled 4-step, stepped-wedge design to compare the effects of usual outpatient palliative care and usual outpatient palliative care along with either nurse- or chaplain-led DT on patient outcomes (dignity impact, existential tasks, and cancer prognosis awareness). We will include 560 elderly patients with cancer from 6 outpatient palliative care services across the United States. Using multilevel analysis with site, provider (nurse, chaplain), and time (step) included in the model, we will compare usual care and DT groups for effects on patient outcomes and spiritual care processes and determine the moderating effects of physical symptoms and spiritual distress.

RESULTS

The funding was obtained in 2016, with participant enrollment starting in 2017. Results are expected in 2021.

CONCLUSIONS

This rigorous trial of DT will constitute a landmark step in palliative care and spiritual health services research for elderly cancer patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03209440; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03209440.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/12213.

摘要

背景

我们的目标是通过优化一项侧重于维护尊严任务(如解决人际关系、表达爱意、准备遗愿文件)的干预措施,改善老年癌症患者的心理社会和精神护理效果。这些任务是老年癌症患者的核心需求。尊严疗法(DT)具有明确的可行性,但疗效并不一致。尊严疗法可由护士或牧师主导,这是姑息治疗中最有可能提供此项干预的两个学科;然而,在现实生活环境中如何能达到最佳效果仍不明确。

目的

我们提出一项随机临床试验,其目的是:(1)比较接受老年癌症患者常规姑息治疗的组或接受常规姑息治疗加尊严疗法的组,在以下方面的效果:(a)患者结局(尊严影响、存在性任务和癌症预后认知);(b)提供姑息性精神护理服务的过程(满意度和未满足的精神需求);(2)探讨身体症状和精神痛苦对常规姑息治疗以及护士或牧师主导的尊严疗法的结局效果(尊严影响和存在性任务)的影响。我们假设,在控制预测试分数的情况下,每个尊严疗法组在尊严影响和存在性任务测量方面的得分将高于常规护理组;每个尊严疗法组在平静意识和与癌症预后更一致的治疗偏好方面将优于常规护理组。我们还假设身体症状和精神痛苦将显著影响干预效果。

方法

我们正在进行一项三臂、前后测、随机、对照的四步阶梯楔形设计,以比较常规门诊姑息治疗以及常规门诊姑息治疗加护士或牧师主导的尊严疗法对患者结局(尊严影响、存在性任务和癌症预后认知)的效果。我们将纳入来自美国6家门诊姑息治疗服务机构的560名老年癌症患者。使用包含地点、提供者(护士、牧师)和时间(步骤)的多层次分析模型,我们将比较常规护理组和尊严疗法组在患者结局和精神护理过程方面的效果,并确定身体症状和精神痛苦的调节作用。

结果

2016年获得资金,2017年开始招募参与者。预计2021年得出结果。

结论

这项对尊严疗法的严格试验将成为老年癌症患者姑息治疗和精神健康服务研究中的一个里程碑式步骤。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03209440;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03209440。

国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/12213。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91c3/6492061/3815457d8fe3/resprot_v8i4e12213_fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验