Suppr超能文献

通过智能手机进行认知偏差矫正训练的效果

Effects of Cognitive Bias Modification Training via Smartphones.

作者信息

Yang Ranming, Cui Lixia, Li Feng, Xiao Jing, Zhang Qin, Oei Tian P S

机构信息

Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition and Department of Psychology, Capital Normal UniversityBeijing, China.

Criminal Justice College, China University of Political Science and LawBeijing, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 14;8:1370. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01370. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Negative cognitive biases have been linked to anxiety and mood problems. Accumulated data from laboratory studies show that positive and negative interpretation styles with accompanying changes in mood can be induced through cognitive bias modification (CBM) paradigms. Despite the therapeutic potential of positive training effects, few studies have explored training paradigms administered via smartphones. The current study aimed to compare the effectiveness of three different types of training programmes (cognitive bias modification-attention, CBM-A; cognitive bias modification-interpretation, CBM-I; attention and interpretation modification, AIM) administered via smart-phones by using a control condition (CC). undergraduate participants with high social anxiety (Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, LSAS ≥ 30) were randomly assigned to four groups: CBM-A ( = 20), CBM-I ( = 20), AIM ( = 16), and CC ( = 20). The results showed that the effects of CBM training, CBM-I training, or AIM training vs. CC for attention yielded no significant differences in dot-probe attention bias scores. The CBM-I group showed significantly less threat interpretation and more benign interpretation than the CC group on interpretation bias scores. The present results supported the feasibility of delivering CBM-I via smartphones, but the effectiveness of CBM-A and AIM training via smartphones was limited.

摘要

消极认知偏差与焦虑和情绪问题有关。实验室研究积累的数据表明,通过认知偏差矫正(CBM)范式可以诱导出积极和消极的解释风格以及随之而来的情绪变化。尽管积极训练效果具有治疗潜力,但很少有研究探索通过智能手机实施的训练范式。本研究旨在通过使用对照条件(CC)比较通过智能手机实施的三种不同类型训练方案(认知偏差矫正-注意力,CBM-A;认知偏差矫正-解释,CBM-I;注意力与解释矫正,AIM)的有效性。社交焦虑程度高的本科参与者(利伯维茨社交焦虑量表,LSAS≥30)被随机分为四组:CBM-A组(n = 20)、CBM-I组(n = 20)、AIM组(n = 16)和CC组(n = 20)。结果显示,在点探测注意力偏差得分方面,CBM训练、CBM-I训练或AIM训练与CC组相比,对注意力产生的影响没有显著差异。在解释偏差得分方面,CBM-I组比CC组表现出显著更少的威胁解释和更多的良性解释。本研究结果支持了通过智能手机实施CBM-I的可行性,但通过智能手机进行CBM-A和AIM训练的有效性有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d566/5557816/dacdaf693aff/fpsyg-08-01370-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验