Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Institute for Human Movement Studies, Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eur Spine J. 2019 Jul;28(7):1550-1564. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05962-x. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
To develop a clinical standard set of outcome measures that are accepted for relevance and feasibility by stakeholders and useful for (a) interaction between patient and the professional, e.g. shared decision-making in goal-setting, monitoring and feedback based on outcomes, (b) internal quality improvement, and (c) external transparency in patients with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) in primary care physical therapy.
We used a consensus-driven modified RAND-UCLA Delphi method in seven steps with panellists (patients, representatives of patient and physiotherapy associations, researchers, policy makers, health insurers): (1) literature search, (2) first online survey, (3) patient interviews, (4) an experts meeting, (5) a consensus meeting, (6) second online survey, and (7) final approval of an advisory board. Steps 1-4 resulted in potential outcome measures. In the consensus meeting after discussion panellists voted for inclusion per measure. In the second online survey the final standard set was rated on relevance and feasibility on a 9-point Likert scale; when the median score was ≥ 7, the standard set was accepted and finally approved.
Thirteen draft outcome measures were rated and discussed, and finally, six outcome measures were accepted. The standard set includes the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, Patient-Specific Functional Scale, Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Global Perceived Effect (GPE-DV), and the STarT Back Screening Tool (SBT).
This study presents a standard set of outcome measures for patients with NSLBP in primary care physiotherapy accepted for relevance and feasibility by stakeholders. The standard set is currently used in daily practice and tested on validity and reliability in a pilot study. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
制定一套临床标准的结局测量指标,这些指标在利益相关者中被认为具有相关性和可行性,并且对于(a)患者与专业人员之间的互动有用,例如在目标设定、基于结果的监测和反馈方面的共同决策,(b)内部质量改进,以及(c)非特异性下腰痛(NSLBP)患者在初级保健物理治疗中的外部透明度。
我们使用了一种共识驱动的改良 RAND-UCLA Delphi 方法,分七个步骤进行,参与者包括(患者、患者和物理治疗协会的代表、研究人员、政策制定者、健康保险公司):(1)文献检索,(2)第一次在线调查,(3)患者访谈,(4)专家会议,(5)共识会议,(6)第二次在线调查,以及(7)顾问委员会的最终批准。步骤 1-4 产生了潜在的结局测量指标。在共识会议上,讨论后参与者对每个指标进行了投票表决。在第二次在线调查中,最终的标准集在相关性和可行性方面的评分是 9 分制;当中位数评分≥7 时,标准集被接受,并最终得到批准。
对 13 项草案结局测量指标进行了评价和讨论,最终有 6 项指标被接受。该标准集包括魁北克腰痛残疾量表、Oswestry 残疾指数、患者特定功能量表、数字疼痛评分量表、总体感知效果(GPE-DV)和 STarT 腰痛筛查工具(SBT)。
本研究提出了一套适用于初级保健物理治疗中 NSLBP 患者的标准结局测量指标,在利益相关者中被认为具有相关性和可行性。该标准集目前在日常实践中使用,并在一项试点研究中对其有效性和可靠性进行了测试。这些幻灯片可以在电子补充材料中检索到。