Rodríguez Laura
The University of Manchester, UK.
World Dev. 2016 Jul;83:111-134. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.02.005.
This paper uses UNICEF's Multiple Indicators Cluster Surveys cross-country data to shed light on unequal investments in the wellbeing of children (boys and girls) within the household. The paper proposes a new methodology to measure the extent of gender intrahousehold inequality and its contribution to overall levels of inequality using an L-Theil index decomposition. The individual and joint distribution of inequality in four key indicators of child wellbeing is analyzed: stunting, birth registration, school attendance, and time spent on work and chores (working hours) in the search for evidence of gender bias. Evidence from various separate county studies had shown that the direction of the gender bias is not universal. Such conclusion holds when using a consistent methodology and comparable cross-country datasets; this paper shows that disparities inside households do not follow the same bias toward one or the other gender in all countries and the direction of the bias is not the same across indicators of wellbeing. While progress in improving child wellbeing has occurred in many countries, inequalities remain. Intrahousehold inequalities might still be considered a priority in an agenda focused on closing these progress gaps.
本文使用联合国儿童基金会多指标类集调查的跨国数据,以揭示家庭内部对儿童(男孩和女孩)福祉的不平等投资情况。本文提出了一种新方法,利用洛伦兹 - 泰尔指数分解来衡量家庭内部性别不平等的程度及其对总体不平等水平的贡献。分析了儿童福祉四个关键指标不平等的个体分布和联合分布:发育迟缓、出生登记、入学率以及用于工作和家务的时间(工作时长),以寻找性别偏见的证据。来自各国单独研究的证据表明,性别偏见的方向并非普遍一致。当使用一致的方法和可比较的跨国数据集时,这一结论依然成立;本文表明,并非所有国家的家庭内部差异都对某一性别存在相同的偏见,而且在不同的福祉指标中,偏见的方向也不尽相同。虽然许多国家在改善儿童福祉方面取得了进展,但不平等现象依然存在。在致力于缩小这些进展差距的议程中,家庭内部不平等问题可能仍应被视为优先事项。