• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理健康触发工具:心理健康环境专用触发工具的开发和测试。

The Mental Health Trigger Tool: Development and Testing of a Specialized Trigger Tool for Mental Health Settings.

机构信息

From the Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.

出版信息

J Patient Saf. 2021 Jun 1;17(4):e360-e366. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000606.

DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000000606
PMID:31009409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8132892/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Tools generally used in measuring patient safety incidents in general healthcare settings are not considered suitable for mental health settings. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a specialized trigger tool for mental health settings that could detect both traditionally defined adverse events (AEs) and other mental health-related patient safety incidents (MHPSIs).

METHODS

We first defined and categorized AEs and MHPSIs based on existing literature and then developed a trigger list, initially consisting of 50 items, which was subsequently reduced to 25 items after a pilot study. We then explored the properties of this final 25-item trigger tool, the Mental Health Trigger Tool (MHTT), through a retrospective review of 515 patient records with a two-stage review process similar to Global Trigger Tool methodology. We used findings of an alternative method of review which consisted of page-to-page reviews of patient records in the analysis of properties of MHTT.

RESULTS

Using the MHTT, at least one AE was identified in 98 patient records (19%) and at least one MHPSI was identified in 58 patient records (11%). The MHTT had a sensitivity of 98.6% and its specificity was 100%. The probability of finding an AE/MHPSI when any trigger was detected in a patient record with MHTT was 33.8% and that of individual triggers ranged from 0% to 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

The MHTT may offer an effective, practical, and easy-to-use method in identifying and measuring safety incidents in mental health settings.

摘要

目的

一般用于衡量一般医疗保健环境中患者安全事件的工具被认为不适合精神卫生环境。本研究旨在开发和评估一种专门用于精神卫生环境的触发工具,该工具既能检测传统定义的不良事件(AE),又能检测其他与精神健康相关的患者安全事件(MHPSI)。

方法

我们首先根据现有文献定义和分类 AE 和 MHPSI,然后开发了一个触发清单,最初包含 50 个项目,在试点研究后减少到 25 个项目。然后,我们通过对 515 份患者记录的回顾性审查,探索了最终的 25 项触发工具,即心理健康触发工具(MHTT)的特性,该审查过程类似于全球触发工具方法,分为两个阶段。我们使用了一种替代审查方法的结果,该方法包括对患者记录逐页审查,以分析 MHTT 的特性。

结果

使用 MHTT,在 98 份患者记录(19%)中至少发现了一个 AE,在 58 份患者记录(11%)中至少发现了一个 MHPSI。MHTT 的灵敏度为 98.6%,特异性为 100%。当使用 MHTT 在患者记录中检测到任何触发时,发现 AE/MHPSI 的概率为 33.8%,而单个触发的概率从 0%到 100%不等。

结论

MHTT 可能为识别和衡量精神卫生环境中的安全事件提供一种有效、实用且易于使用的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4575/8132892/350f2d59c395/pts-17-e360-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4575/8132892/350f2d59c395/pts-17-e360-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4575/8132892/350f2d59c395/pts-17-e360-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Mental Health Trigger Tool: Development and Testing of a Specialized Trigger Tool for Mental Health Settings.心理健康触发工具:心理健康环境专用触发工具的开发和测试。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Jun 1;17(4):e360-e366. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000606.
2
The Emergency Department Trigger Tool: Validation and Testing to Optimize Yield.急诊科触发工具:验证和测试以优化效果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;27(12):1279-1290. doi: 10.1111/acem.14101. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
3
Validation of triggers and development of a pediatric trigger tool to identify adverse events.验证触发因素并开发用于识别不良事件的儿科触发工具。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 21;14:655. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0655-5.
4
Development of a trigger tool to identify harmful incidents, no harm incidents, and near misses in prehospital emergency care.开发一种触发工具,以识别院前急救中有害事件、无伤害事件和接近伤害事件。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Apr 29;32(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01209-x.
5
Development of a trigger tool to identify adverse events and no-harm incidents that affect patients admitted to home healthcare.开发一种触发工具,以识别影响到接受家庭医疗保健患者的不良事件和无伤害事件。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Jul;27(7):502-511. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006755. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
6
An adverse event trigger tool in dentistry: a new methodology for measuring harm in the dental office.牙科不良事件触发工具:一种测量牙科诊所伤害的新方法。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Jul;144(7):808-14. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0191.
7
Development of a trigger tool to identify adverse events and harm in Emergency Medical Services.开发一种触发工具以识别紧急医疗服务中的不良事件和伤害。
Emerg Med J. 2017 Jun;34(6):391-397. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-205746. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
8
Comparison of traditional trigger tool to data warehouse based screening for identifying hospital adverse events.传统触发工具与数据仓库筛查在识别医院不良事件中的比较。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Feb;22(2):130-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001102. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
9
Adverse events identified by the global trigger tool at a university hospital: A retrospective medical record review.全球触发工具在一所大学医院识别的不良事件:回顾性病历审查。
J Evid Based Med. 2019 May;12(2):91-97. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12329. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
10
Measuring adverse events in pediatric inpatients with the Global Trigger Tool.使用全球触发工具测量儿科住院患者的不良事件。
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2017 Aug 1;115(4):357-363. doi: 10.5546/aap.2017.eng.357.

引用本文的文献

1
Active surveillance of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension based on the global trigger tool.基于全球触发工具对住院肺动脉高压患者药物不良事件进行主动监测。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Aug 14;16:1533634. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1533634. eCollection 2025.
2
Development and validation of trigger tools in primary care: A scoping review.初级保健中触发工具的开发与验证:一项范围综述
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 2;20(1):e0308906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308906. eCollection 2025.
3
Active monitoring of antifungal adverse events in hospitalized patients based on Global Trigger Tool method.
基于全球触发工具法对住院患者抗真菌不良事件进行主动监测。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jun 28;15:1322587. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1322587. eCollection 2024.
4
Validation of a Reduced Set of High-Performance Triggers for Identifying Patient Safety Incidents with Harm in Primary Care: TriggerPrim Project.用于识别初级保健中存在伤害的患者安全事件的高性能触发因素的简化集的验证:TriggerPrim 项目。
J Patient Saf. 2023 Dec 1;19(8):508-516. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001161. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
5
Management practice and discharge outcome of patients with psychiatric disorder admitted to psychiatry wards of selected specialized settings in Ethiopia.在选定的埃塞俄比亚专业机构的精神科病房中,精神障碍患者的管理实践和出院结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 May 17;23(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04860-3.
6
Patient Safety and Mental Health-A Growing Quality Gap in Canada.患者安全与精神健康:加拿大日益扩大的质量差距。
Can J Psychiatry. 2022 Apr;67(4):246-249. doi: 10.1177/07067437211036596. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
7
Adverse events in psychiatry: a national cohort study in Sweden with a unique psychiatric trigger tool.精神病学中的不良事件:瑞典一项具有独特精神科触发工具的全国队列研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 4;20(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-2447-2.