Konkle Barbara A, Skinner Mark, Iorio Alfonso
Bloodworks Northwest Seattle Washington.
Department of Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington.
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2019 Mar 12;3(2):184-192. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12195. eCollection 2019 Apr.
Treatment for hemophilia has advanced dramatically over the past 5 decades. Success of prophylactic therapy in preventing bleeding and decreasing associated complications has established a new standard of care. However, with the advent of gene therapy and treatments that effectively mimic sustained coagulation factor replacement, outcome measures that worked well for assessing factor replacement therapies in past clinical trials need to be reassessed. In addition, while therapies have advanced, so has the science of outcome assessment, including recognition of the importance of patient important and patient reported outcomes. This manuscript reviews strengths and limitations of outcome measures used in hemophilia from both a provider and patient perspective.
在过去的50年里,血友病的治疗取得了巨大进展。预防性治疗在预防出血和减少相关并发症方面的成功确立了新的护理标准。然而,随着基因治疗和有效模拟持续凝血因子替代治疗的出现,过去临床试验中用于评估因子替代疗法的有效结果指标需要重新评估。此外,虽然治疗方法有所进步,但结果评估科学也在进步,包括认识到患者重要结局和患者报告结局的重要性。本文从医疗服务提供者和患者的角度综述了血友病治疗中使用的结局指标的优缺点。