• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人群的胃癌患者肿瘤阳性切缘危险因素研究。

Population-Based Study on Risk Factors for Tumor-Positive Resection Margins in Patients with Gastric Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jul;26(7):2222-2233. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07381-0. Epub 2019 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-019-07381-0
PMID:31011900
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6545177/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Radical gastrectomy is the cornerstone of the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer. This study was designed to evaluate factors associated with a tumor-positive resection margin after gastrectomy and to evaluate the influence of hospital volume.

METHODS

In this Dutch cohort study, patients with junctional or gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy between 2011 and 2017 were included. The primary outcome was incomplete tumor removal after the operation defined as the microscopic presence of tumor cells at the resection margin. The association of patient and disease characteristics with incomplete tumor removal was tested with multivariable regression analysis. The association of annual hospital volume with incomplete tumor removal was tested and adjusted for the patient- and disease characteristics.

RESULTS

In total, 2799 patients were included. Incomplete tumor removal was seen in 265 (9.5%) patients. Factors associated with incomplete tumor removal were: tumor located in the entire stomach (odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.38 [1.91-5.96] reference: gastroesophageal junction), cT3, cT4, cTx (1.75 [1.20-2.56], 2.63 [1.47-4.70], 1.60 [1.03-2.48], reference: cT0-2), pN+ (2.73 [1.96-3.80], reference: pN-), and diffuse and unknown histological subtype (3.15 [2.14-4.46] and 2.05 [1.34-3.13], reference: intestinal). Unknown differentiation grade was associated with complete tumor removal (0.50 [0.30-0.83], reference: poor/undifferentiated). Compared with a hospital volume of < 20 resections/year, 20-39, and > 39 resections were associated with lower probability for incomplete tumor removal (OR 0.56 [0.42-0.76] and 0.34 [0.18-0.64]).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor location, cT, pN, histological subtype, and tumor differentiation are associated with incomplete tumor removal. The association of incomplete tumor removal with an annual hospital volume of < 20 resections may underline the need for further centralization of gastric cancer care in the Netherlands.

摘要

背景

根治性胃切除术是局部进展期胃癌治疗的基石。本研究旨在评估胃切除术后肿瘤阳性切缘的相关因素,并评估医院容量的影响。

方法

在这项荷兰队列研究中,纳入了 2011 年至 2017 年间接受根治性胃切除术的交界性或胃癌患者。主要结局为术后不完全肿瘤切除,定义为切缘处有肿瘤细胞的显微镜下存在。采用多变量回归分析检测患者和疾病特征与不完全肿瘤切除的关系。检测并调整了医院年容量与不完全肿瘤切除的相关性。

结果

共纳入 2799 例患者。265 例(9.5%)患者存在不完全肿瘤切除。与不完全肿瘤切除相关的因素包括:肿瘤位于整个胃(比值比(OR)[95%置信区间(CI):3.38[1.91-5.96],参考:胃食管交界处),cT3、cT4、cTx(1.75[1.20-2.56]、2.63[1.47-4.70]、1.60[1.03-2.48],参考:cT0-2)、pN+(2.73[1.96-3.80],参考:pN-)和弥漫性和未知组织学亚型(3.15[2.14-4.46]和 2.05[1.34-3.13],参考:肠型)。未知分化程度与完全肿瘤切除相关(0.50[0.30-0.83],参考:低/未分化)。与医院年手术量<20 例相比,20-39 例和>39 例与不完全肿瘤切除的概率较低相关(OR 0.56[0.42-0.76]和 0.34[0.18-0.64])。

结论

肿瘤位置、cT、pN、组织学亚型和肿瘤分化与不完全肿瘤切除有关。不完全肿瘤切除与<20 例/年的医院年手术量相关,这可能表明荷兰需要进一步集中胃癌治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bf1/6545177/b8a4986a93b9/10434_2019_7381_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bf1/6545177/58e20189b804/10434_2019_7381_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bf1/6545177/b8a4986a93b9/10434_2019_7381_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bf1/6545177/58e20189b804/10434_2019_7381_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bf1/6545177/b8a4986a93b9/10434_2019_7381_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Population-Based Study on Risk Factors for Tumor-Positive Resection Margins in Patients with Gastric Cancer.基于人群的胃癌患者肿瘤阳性切缘危险因素研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jul;26(7):2222-2233. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07381-0. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
2
Risk factor analysis for involvement of resection margins in gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer: an Italian multicenter study.胃及食管胃交界癌切缘受累的危险因素分析:一项意大利多中心研究
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jan;20(1):70-82. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0589-6. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
3
Overall Volume of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Positively Impacts Gastric Cancer Outcomes at Centers with Low Gastrectomy Volume.总体上消化道手术量对胃切除术量低的中心的胃癌结局有积极影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Aug;31(8):5293-5303. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15381-y. Epub 2024 May 22.
4
Prognostic Relevance of the Proximal Resection Margin Distance in Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma.胃腺癌远端胃癌根治术中切缘距离的预后相关性。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(10):6900-6908. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15721-y. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
5
Proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy for proximal third gastric cancer: total gastrectomy is not always necessary.近端胃癌行近端胃切除术与全胃切除术的比较:全胃切除术并非总是必要的。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Aug;401(5):687-97. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1422-3. Epub 2016 May 4.
6
Adenocarcinoma of the gastric antrum: does D2 total gastrectomy with splenectomy improve prognosis compared to D1 subtotal gastrectomy? A long-term survival analysis with emphasis on Lauren classification.胃窦腺癌:与D1次全胃切除术相比,D2全胃切除术加脾切除术能改善预后吗?一项侧重于劳伦分类的长期生存分析。
Surg Oncol. 1995;4(6):323-32. doi: 10.1016/s0960-7404(10)80045-3.
7
[Hospital volume effects in surgical treatment of gastric cancer : Results of a prospective multicenter observational study].[医院容量对胃癌手术治疗的影响:一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究的结果]
Chirurg. 2017 Apr;88(4):328-338. doi: 10.1007/s00104-016-0292-0.
8
Association of surgeon and hospital volume with postoperative mortality after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: data from 71,307 Japanese patients collected from a nationwide web-based data entry system.胃癌全胃切除术后手术医生和医院手术量与术后死亡率的关系:来自全国联网电子数据输入系统的 71307 例日本患者数据。
Gastric Cancer. 2021 Mar;24(2):526-534. doi: 10.1007/s10120-020-01127-8. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
9
Risk factors analysis and stratification for microscopically positive resection margin in gastric cancer patients.胃癌患者显微镜下切缘阳性的危险因素分析与分层
BMC Surg. 2020 May 7;20(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00744-5.
10
Hospital volume following major surgery for gastric cancer determines in-hospital mortality rate and failure to rescue: a nation-wide study based on German billing data (2009-2017).基于德国计费数据的全国性研究(2009-2017 年):胃癌大手术后的医院容量决定住院死亡率和抢救失败率。
Gastric Cancer. 2021 Jul;24(4):959-969. doi: 10.1007/s10120-021-01167-8. Epub 2021 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of gamma knife stereotactic radiotherapy on the hematological system in patients with advanced lung cancer and its therapeutic effect.伽玛刀立体定向放射治疗对晚期肺癌患者血液系统的影响及其治疗效果。
Am J Cancer Res. 2025 Apr 15;15(4):1777-1789. doi: 10.62347/KMWI9314. eCollection 2025.
2
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Trials.局部进展期胃癌的微创与开放远端胃切除术:随机试验的序贯分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 6;16(23):4098. doi: 10.3390/cancers16234098.
3
Effect of Minimally Invasive versus Open Distal Gastrectomy on Long-Term Survival in Patients with Gastric Cancer: Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
International benchmarking in oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery.国际食管癌和胃癌手术基准比较。
BJS Open. 2018 Oct 19;3(1):62-73. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50107. eCollection 2019 Feb.
2
University hospital status and surgeon volume and risk of reoperation following surgery for esophageal cancer.大学医院的地位和外科医生的手术量与食管癌手术后再次手术的风险。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 May;44(5):632-637. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.02.212. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
3
A Population-based Study on Lymph Node Retrieval in Patients with Esophageal Cancer: Results from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit.
微创与开放远端胃癌切除术对胃癌患者长期生存的影响:个体患者数据荟萃分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;32(3):2161-2171. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16677-9. Epub 2024 Dec 15.
4
Risk factors and prognostic analysis of microscopic positive esophageal margins after radical surgery for proximal gastric cancer.根治性手术后近端胃癌显微镜下食管切缘阳性的危险因素及预后分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 26;24(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03527-x.
5
The correlation between the margin of resection and prognosis in esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.食管胃结合部腺癌的切缘与预后的相关性。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct 9;21(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03202-7.
6
Current Trends in Volume and Surgical Outcomes in Gastric Cancer.胃癌手术量及手术结果的当前趋势
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 4;12(7):2708. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072708.
7
Associations of Annual Hospital and Surgeon Volume with Patient Outcomes After Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.年度医院和外科医生手术量与胃切除术患者预后的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;29(13):8276-8297. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12515-y. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
8
Prevention and treatment of a positive proximal margin after gastrectomy for cardia cancer.贲门癌胃切除术后阳性近端切缘的预防和治疗。
Updates Surg. 2023 Feb;75(2):335-341. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01315-4. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
9
Novel multifunctional NIR-II aggregation-induced emission nanoparticles-assisted intraoperative identification and elimination of residual tumor.新型多功能近红外二区聚集诱导发射纳米粒子辅助术中残余肿瘤的识别与消除。
J Nanobiotechnology. 2022 Mar 19;20(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12951-022-01325-9.
10
Clinical Relevance of the Tumor Location-Modified Laurén Classification System for Gastric Cancer in a Western Population.Laurén 分类系统改良版肿瘤部位分类在西方人群胃癌中的临床相关性。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Jun;29(6):3911-3920. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-11252-y. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
一项基于人群的食管癌淋巴结检出量研究:来自荷兰上消化道肿瘤审计的数据。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 May;25(5):1211-1220. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6396-7. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
4
Colonic Interposition After Adult Oesophagectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Conduit Choice and Outcome.成人食管切除术后结肠间置术:导管选择和结果的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Jun;22(6):1104-1111. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3735-8. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
5
Use of endoscopy to determine the resection margin during laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer.使用内窥镜确定腹腔镜胃癌切除术的切除边界。
Br J Surg. 2017 Dec;104(13):1829-1836. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10618. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
6
Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Non-Pretreated Gastric Cancer.辅助放化疗治疗未经预处理的胃癌。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Nov;24(12):3647-3657. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6048-3. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
7
Postoperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy Versus Open Gastrectomy During the Early Introduction of Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy in the Netherlands: A Population-based Cohort Study.荷兰微创胃切除术早期引入期间微创与开放胃切除术的术后结果:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Ann Surg. 2017 Nov;266(5):831-838. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002391.
8
[R1 resection for gastric carcinoma].[胃癌的R1切除术]
Chirurg. 2017 Sep;88(9):756-763. doi: 10.1007/s00104-017-0460-x.
9
Early outcomes from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit.荷兰上消化道肿瘤审计的早期结果。
Br J Surg. 2016 Dec;103(13):1855-1863. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10303. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
10
Risk factor analysis for involvement of resection margins in gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer: an Italian multicenter study.胃及食管胃交界癌切缘受累的危险因素分析:一项意大利多中心研究
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jan;20(1):70-82. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0589-6. Epub 2016 Jan 5.