• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Risk factors analysis and stratification for microscopically positive resection margin in gastric cancer patients.胃癌患者显微镜下切缘阳性的危险因素分析与分层
BMC Surg. 2020 May 7;20(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00744-5.
2
Risk factor analysis for involvement of resection margins in gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer: an Italian multicenter study.胃及食管胃交界癌切缘受累的危险因素分析:一项意大利多中心研究
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jan;20(1):70-82. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0589-6. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
3
Risk factor analysis for duodenal margin positivity following gastrectomy for resectable gastric cancer.胃切除术后可切除胃癌十二指肠缘阳性的危险因素分析。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2023 Oct;19(5):e300-e304. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13910. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
4
Utility of the proximal margin frozen section for resection of gastric adenocarcinoma: a 7-Institution Study of the US Gastric Cancer Collaborative.近端切缘冰冻切片在胃腺癌切除术中的应用:美国胃癌协作组的7机构研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Dec;21(13):4202-10. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3834-z. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
5
Total length of positive resection margins can predict remnant gastric cancer following endoscopic submucosal dissection.阳性切缘总长度可预测内镜黏膜下剥离术后残胃癌。
Pathol Res Pract. 2020 Nov;216(11):153183. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2020.153183. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
6
Diagnostic Accuracy and Usefulness of Intraoperative Margin Assessment by Frozen Section in Gastric Cancer.术中冰冻切片评估胃癌切缘的诊断准确性和实用性。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(6):1787-1794. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07302-1. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
7
Clinical usefulness of extending the proximal margin in total gastrectomies for gastric adenocarcinoma.扩大近端切缘在胃腺癌全胃切除术中的临床应用价值
Rev Gastroenterol Mex (Engl Ed). 2019 Apr-Jun;84(2):136-142. doi: 10.1016/j.rgmx.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 May 9.
8
Prognostic effect of microscopically negative but close resection margin in gastric cancer.胃癌中显微镜下阴性但切缘接近的预后影响。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep;50(9):108517. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108517. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
9
Prognostic Impact of Frozen Section Investigation and Extent of Proximal Safety Margin in Gastric Cancer Resection.胃癌切除术中冰冻切片检查和近端安全切缘范围的预后影响。
Ann Surg. 2020 Nov;272(5):871-878. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004266.
10
Population-Based Study on Risk Factors for Tumor-Positive Resection Margins in Patients with Gastric Cancer.基于人群的胃癌患者肿瘤阳性切缘危险因素研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jul;26(7):2222-2233. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07381-0. Epub 2019 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Maintenance of resection margins in gastrectomy for cancer: simple in procedure, influential in survival-current status and literature review on optimal lengths and positive margins.胃癌胃切除术中切缘的维持:手术操作简单,对生存有影响——最佳长度和切缘阳性的现状及文献综述
Surg Today. 2025 Jun 7. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-03068-0.
2
Comprehensive analysis of risk factors associated with submucosal invasion in patients with early-stage gastric cancer.早期胃癌患者黏膜下浸润相关危险因素的综合分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec 21;30(47):5007-5017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i47.5007.
3
Risk factors and prognostic analysis of microscopic positive esophageal margins after radical surgery for proximal gastric cancer.根治性手术后近端胃癌显微镜下食管切缘阳性的危险因素及预后分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 26;24(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03527-x.
4
Selecting Targets for Molecular Imaging of Gastric Cancer: An Immunohistochemical Evaluation.胃癌分子成像靶点的选择:免疫组织化学评估
Mol Diagn Ther. 2025 Mar;29(2):213-227. doi: 10.1007/s40291-024-00755-5. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
5
Adequate gross resection margin length ensuring pathologically complete resection in gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.胃癌胃切除术中确保病理完全切除的足够切缘长度:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2023 Dec 5;8(2):202-213. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12761. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Comparative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy and Open Gastrectomy for Scirrhous Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.腹腔镜胃癌根治术与开腹胃癌根治术治疗硬癌型胃癌的比较结果:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
Ann Surg Open. 2021 Apr 27;2(2):e063. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000063. eCollection 2021 Jun.
7
Changes in Oncological Surgical Principles Driven by Advances in Preoperative Treatments.术前治疗进展推动肿瘤外科手术原则的变化。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2023 Aug 8;19:667-674. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S415860. eCollection 2023.
8
Clinical Impact of Positive Surgical Margins in Gastric Adenocarcinoma in the Era of Preoperative Therapy.术前治疗时代胃腺癌中阳性手术切缘的临床影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Aug;30(8):4936-4945. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13495-3. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
9
Prevention and treatment of a positive proximal margin after gastrectomy for cardia cancer.贲门癌胃切除术后阳性近端切缘的预防和治疗。
Updates Surg. 2023 Feb;75(2):335-341. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01315-4. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
10
Is proximal gastrectomy indicated for locally advanced cancer in the upper third of the stomach?近端胃切除术适用于胃上三分之一处的局部进展期癌症吗?
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021 Jul 16;5(6):767-775. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12486. eCollection 2021 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
A prospective multi-institutional validity study to evaluate the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of pathological stage III gastric cancer (JCOG1302A).一项评估临床诊断病理 III 期胃癌(JCOG1302A)准确性的前瞻性多机构验证研究。
Gastric Cancer. 2018 Jan;21(1):68-73. doi: 10.1007/s10120-017-0701-1. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
2
Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4).《日本胃癌治疗指南2014(第4版)》
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jan;20(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0622-4. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
3
Risk factor analysis for involvement of resection margins in gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer: an Italian multicenter study.胃及食管胃交界癌切缘受累的危险因素分析:一项意大利多中心研究
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jan;20(1):70-82. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0589-6. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
4
The importance of surgical margins in gastric cancer.手术切缘在胃癌中的重要性。
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;113(3):277-82. doi: 10.1002/jso.24110. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
5
Is Linitis Plastica a Contraindication for Surgical Resection: A Multi-Institution Study of the U.S. Gastric Cancer Collaborative.皮革胃是手术切除的禁忌症吗:美国胃癌协作组的多机构研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Apr;23(4):1203-11. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4947-8. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
6
Diagnostic accuracy and utility of intraoperative microscopic margin analysis of gastric and esophageal adenocarcinoma.胃和食管腺癌术中显微镜下切缘分析的诊断准确性及应用价值
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Aug;21(8):2580-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3669-7. Epub 2014 May 8.
7
Prognostic value of surgical margin status in gastric cancer patients.胃癌患者手术切缘状态的预后价值
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Sep;85(9):678-84. doi: 10.1111/ans.12515. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
8
Systematic review of the predictors of positive margins in gastric cancer surgery and the effect on survival.胃癌手术中切缘阳性预测因素的系统评价及其对生存的影响。
Gastric Cancer. 2012 Sep;15 Suppl 1:S116-24. doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0112-7. Epub 2011 Dec 3.
9
Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition.日本胃癌分类:第3版英文版
Gastric Cancer. 2011 Jun;14(2):101-12. doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0041-5.
10
Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3).《日本胃癌治疗指南2010(第3版)》
Gastric Cancer. 2011 Jun;14(2):113-23. doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0042-4.

胃癌患者显微镜下切缘阳性的危险因素分析与分层

Risk factors analysis and stratification for microscopically positive resection margin in gastric cancer patients.

作者信息

Kumazu Yuta, Hayashi Tsutomu, Yoshikawa Takaki, Yamada Takanobu, Hara Kentaro, Shimoda Yota, Nakazono Masato, Nagasawa Shinsuke, Shiozawa Manabu, Morinaga Soichiro, Rino Yasushi, Masuda Munetaka, Ogata Takashi, Oshima Takashi

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 241-8515, Asahiku Nakao 2-3-2, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.

Devision of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuoku Tsukiji 5-1-1, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2020 May 7;20(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00744-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-020-00744-5
PMID:32380979
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7204060/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cancer cells are often found postoperatively at surgical resection margins (RM) in patients with gastric cancer because of submucosal infiltration or hesitation to secure adequate RM. This study was designed to evaluate risk factors for microscopic positive RM and to clarify which patients should undergo intraoperative frozen section diagnosis (IFSD).

METHODS

Patients who underwent R0/1 gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma between 2000 and 2018 in a single cancer center in Japan were studied. We divided the patients into a positive RM group and negative RM group according to the results of definitive histopathological examinations. We performed multivariate analysis to analyze risk factors for positive RM by and used the identified risk factors to risk stratify the patients.

RESULTS

A total of 2757 patients were studied, including 49 (1.8%) in the positive RM group. The risk factors significantly associated with positive RM were remnant gastric cancer (odds ratio [OR] 4.7), esophageal invasion (OR 6.3), tumor size ≥80 mm (OR 3.9), and a histopathological diagnosis of undifferentiated type (OR 3.6), macroscopic type 4 (OR 3.7), or pT4 disease (OR 4.6). On risk stratification analysis, the incidence of positive RM was 0.1% without any risk factors, increasing to 0.4% with one risk factor, 3.1% with two risk factors, 5.3% with three risk factors, 21.3% with four risk factors, and 85.7% with five risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of macroscopically positive RM increased in patients who have risk factors. IFSD should be performed in patients who have four or more risk factors.

摘要

背景

由于黏膜下浸润或难以确保足够的手术切缘,胃癌患者术后常在手术切缘发现癌细胞。本研究旨在评估显微镜下切缘阳性的危险因素,并明确哪些患者应接受术中冰冻切片诊断(IFSD)。

方法

对2000年至2018年在日本一家癌症中心接受R0/1胃切除术治疗胃腺癌的患者进行研究。根据最终组织病理学检查结果将患者分为切缘阳性组和切缘阴性组。我们进行多因素分析以分析切缘阳性的危险因素,并使用确定的危险因素对患者进行风险分层。

结果

共研究了2757例患者,其中切缘阳性组49例(1.8%)。与切缘阳性显著相关的危险因素为残胃癌(比值比[OR]4.7)、食管侵犯(OR 6.3)、肿瘤大小≥80mm(OR 3.9)、组织病理学诊断为未分化型(OR 3.6)、大体类型4(OR 3.7)或pT4期疾病(OR 4.6)。在风险分层分析中,无任何危险因素时切缘阳性的发生率为0.1%,有一个危险因素时增至0.4%,有两个危险因素时为3.1%,有三个危险因素时为5.3%,有四个危险因素时为21.3%,有五个危险因素时为85.7%。

结论

有危险因素的患者肉眼可见切缘阳性的风险增加。有四个或更多危险因素的患者应进行术中冰冻切片诊断。