Suppr超能文献

胃癌患者显微镜下切缘阳性的危险因素分析与分层

Risk factors analysis and stratification for microscopically positive resection margin in gastric cancer patients.

作者信息

Kumazu Yuta, Hayashi Tsutomu, Yoshikawa Takaki, Yamada Takanobu, Hara Kentaro, Shimoda Yota, Nakazono Masato, Nagasawa Shinsuke, Shiozawa Manabu, Morinaga Soichiro, Rino Yasushi, Masuda Munetaka, Ogata Takashi, Oshima Takashi

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 241-8515, Asahiku Nakao 2-3-2, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.

Devision of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuoku Tsukiji 5-1-1, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2020 May 7;20(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00744-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cancer cells are often found postoperatively at surgical resection margins (RM) in patients with gastric cancer because of submucosal infiltration or hesitation to secure adequate RM. This study was designed to evaluate risk factors for microscopic positive RM and to clarify which patients should undergo intraoperative frozen section diagnosis (IFSD).

METHODS

Patients who underwent R0/1 gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma between 2000 and 2018 in a single cancer center in Japan were studied. We divided the patients into a positive RM group and negative RM group according to the results of definitive histopathological examinations. We performed multivariate analysis to analyze risk factors for positive RM by and used the identified risk factors to risk stratify the patients.

RESULTS

A total of 2757 patients were studied, including 49 (1.8%) in the positive RM group. The risk factors significantly associated with positive RM were remnant gastric cancer (odds ratio [OR] 4.7), esophageal invasion (OR 6.3), tumor size ≥80 mm (OR 3.9), and a histopathological diagnosis of undifferentiated type (OR 3.6), macroscopic type 4 (OR 3.7), or pT4 disease (OR 4.6). On risk stratification analysis, the incidence of positive RM was 0.1% without any risk factors, increasing to 0.4% with one risk factor, 3.1% with two risk factors, 5.3% with three risk factors, 21.3% with four risk factors, and 85.7% with five risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of macroscopically positive RM increased in patients who have risk factors. IFSD should be performed in patients who have four or more risk factors.

摘要

背景

由于黏膜下浸润或难以确保足够的手术切缘,胃癌患者术后常在手术切缘发现癌细胞。本研究旨在评估显微镜下切缘阳性的危险因素,并明确哪些患者应接受术中冰冻切片诊断(IFSD)。

方法

对2000年至2018年在日本一家癌症中心接受R0/1胃切除术治疗胃腺癌的患者进行研究。根据最终组织病理学检查结果将患者分为切缘阳性组和切缘阴性组。我们进行多因素分析以分析切缘阳性的危险因素,并使用确定的危险因素对患者进行风险分层。

结果

共研究了2757例患者,其中切缘阳性组49例(1.8%)。与切缘阳性显著相关的危险因素为残胃癌(比值比[OR]4.7)、食管侵犯(OR 6.3)、肿瘤大小≥80mm(OR 3.9)、组织病理学诊断为未分化型(OR 3.6)、大体类型4(OR 3.7)或pT4期疾病(OR 4.6)。在风险分层分析中,无任何危险因素时切缘阳性的发生率为0.1%,有一个危险因素时增至0.4%,有两个危险因素时为3.1%,有三个危险因素时为5.3%,有四个危险因素时为21.3%,有五个危险因素时为85.7%。

结论

有危险因素的患者肉眼可见切缘阳性的风险增加。有四个或更多危险因素的患者应进行术中冰冻切片诊断。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4).《日本胃癌治疗指南2014(第4版)》
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jan;20(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0622-4. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
4
The importance of surgical margins in gastric cancer.手术切缘在胃癌中的重要性。
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;113(3):277-82. doi: 10.1002/jso.24110. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
7
9
Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition.日本胃癌分类:第3版英文版
Gastric Cancer. 2011 Jun;14(2):101-12. doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0041-5.
10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验