Department of General Practice.
School of Pharmacy.
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 May;69(682):e345-e355. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X702413.
Medication errors frequently occur as patients transition between hospital and the community, and may result in patient harm. Novel methods are required to address this issue.
To assess the feasibility of introducing an electronic patient-held active record of medication status device (PHARMS) at the primary-secondary care interface at the time of hospital discharge.
A mixed-methods study (non-randomised controlled intervention, and a process evaluation of qualitative interviews and non-participant observation) among patients >60 years in an urban hospital and general practices in Cork, Ireland.
The number and clinical significance of errors were compared between discharge prescriptions of the intervention (issued with a PHARMS device) and control (usual care, handwritten discharge prescription) groups. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients, junior doctors, GPs, and IT professionals, in addition to direct observation of the implementation process.
In all, 102 patients were included in the final analysis (intervention = 41, control = 61). Total error number was lower in the intervention group (median 1, interquartile range [IQR] 0-3) than in the control group (median 8, IQR (4-13.5, <0.001), with the clinical significance score in the intervention group also being lower than the control group (median 2, IQR 0-4 versus median 11, IQR 5-20, <0.001). The PHARMS device was found to be technically implementable using existing information technology infrastructure, and acceptable to all key stakeholders.
The results suggest that using PHARMS devices within existing systems in general practice and hospitals is feasible and acceptable to both patients and doctors, and may reduce medication error.
患者在医院和社区之间转换时经常会发生用药错误,可能导致患者受到伤害。需要采用新的方法来解决这个问题。
评估在医院出院时,在初级保健和二级保健之间引入电子患者携带的药物状态记录器(PHARMS)的可行性。
在爱尔兰科克市的一家城市医院和普通诊所中,对>60 岁的患者进行了一项混合方法研究(非随机对照干预和定性访谈和非参与观察的过程评估)。
比较干预组(使用 PHARMS 设备开具的出院处方)和对照组(常规护理,手写出院处方)出院处方之间的错误数量和临床意义。除了直接观察实施过程外,还对患者、初级医生、全科医生和 IT 专业人员进行了半结构化访谈。
共有 102 名患者纳入最终分析(干预组 41 例,对照组 61 例)。干预组的总错误数量(中位数 1,四分位距 [IQR] 0-3)低于对照组(中位数 8,IQR 4-13.5,<0.001),且干预组的临床意义评分也低于对照组(中位数 2,IQR 0-4 与中位数 11,IQR 5-20,<0.001)。研究发现,PHARMS 设备在使用现有信息技术基础设施方面具有技术可行性,并且得到了所有关键利益相关者的认可。
结果表明,在普通诊所和医院的现有系统中使用 PHARMS 设备是可行且可接受的,并且可能会减少用药错误。