Ehnbom Elin C, Raban Magdalena Z, Walter Scott R, Richardson Katrina, Westbrook Johanna I
The University of New South Wales UNSW Sydney NSW 2052 Australia.
Australian Institute of Health Innovation The University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW.
Health Inf Manag. 2014;43(3):4-12. doi: 10.1177/183335831404300301.
Complete, accurate and timely hospital discharge summaries are important for continuity of care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an electronic discharge summary system in improving the medication information provided compared to the information in paper discharge summaries. We conducted a retrospective audit of 199 paper and 200 electronic discharge summaries from a 350-bed teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia. The completeness of medication information, and whether medication changes during the admission were explained, were assessed. Further, the likelihood of any incomplete information having an impact on continuity of care was assessed. There were 1352 and 1771 medication orders assessed in paper and electronic discharge summaries, respectively. Of these, 90.9% and 93.4% were complete in paper and electronic discharge summaries, respectively. The dose (OR 25.24, 95%CI: 3.41-186.9) and route (OR 8.65, 95%CI: 3.46-21.59) fields of medication orders, were more likely to be complete in electronic as compared with paper discharge summaries. There was no difference for drug frequency (OR 1.09, 95%CI: 0.77-1.55). There was no significant improvement in the proportion of incomplete medication orders rated as unclear and likely to impede continuity of care in paper compared with electronic discharge summaries (7.3% vs. 6.5%). Of changes to medication regimen, only medication additions were more likely to be explained in the electronic (n=253, 37.2%) compared to paper (n=104, 14.3%) discharge summaries (OR 3.14; 95%CI: 2.20-4.18). In summary, electronic discharge summaries offer some improvements over paper discharge summaries in terms of the quality of medication information documented. However, explanations of changes to medication regimens remained low, despite this being crucial information. Future efforts should focus on including the rationale for changes to medication regimens in discharge summaries.
完整、准确且及时的医院出院小结对于医疗服务的连续性至关重要。本研究的目的是评估电子出院小结系统相较于纸质出院小结在提供用药信息方面的有效性。我们对澳大利亚悉尼一家拥有350张床位的教学医院的199份纸质出院小结和200份电子出院小结进行了回顾性审核。评估了用药信息的完整性以及是否对住院期间的用药变化做出了解释。此外,还评估了任何不完整信息对医疗服务连续性产生影响的可能性。纸质和电子出院小结中分别评估了1352项和1771项用药医嘱。其中,纸质和电子出院小结中用药医嘱的完整性分别为90.9%和93.4%。与纸质出院小结相比,电子出院小结中用药医嘱的剂量(比值比25.24,95%置信区间:3.41 - 186.9)和给药途径(比值比8.65,95%置信区间:3.46 - 21.59)字段更有可能完整。用药频率方面无差异(比值比1.09,95%置信区间:0.77 - 1.55)。与电子出院小结相比,纸质出院小结中被评为不明确且可能妨碍医疗服务连续性的不完整用药医嘱比例没有显著改善(7.3%对6.5%)。在用药方案的变化方面,与纸质出院小结(n = 104,14.3%)相比,电子出院小结(n = 253,37.2%)中仅用药添加情况更有可能得到解释(比值比3.14;95%置信区间:2.20 - 4.18)。总之,就记录的用药信息质量而言,电子出院小结比纸质出院小结有一些改进。然而,尽管这是关键信息,但用药方案变化的解释率仍然很低。未来的努力应集中在将用药方案变化的理由纳入出院小结中。