• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the efficacy and acceptability to patients of a physiotherapist working in a health centre.对在健康中心工作的物理治疗师的疗效及患者接受度的评估。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Jan 3;294(6563):24-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6563.24.
2
Management of joint and soft tissue injuries in three general practices: value of on-site physiotherapy.三家普通诊所中关节及软组织损伤的管理:现场物理治疗的价值
Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Feb;43(367):61-4.
3
An evaluation of prompt access to physiotherapy in the management of low back pain in primary care.初级保健中腰痛管理中物理治疗快速获取情况的评估。
Fam Pract. 2004 Aug;21(4):372-80. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh406.
4
Economic evaluation of a general practitioner with special interests led dermatology service in primary care.在初级医疗保健中,由具有特殊兴趣的全科医生主导的皮肤科服务的经济评估。
BMJ. 2005 Dec 17;331(7530):1444-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38676.446910.7C. Epub 2005 Dec 8.
5
Making physiotherapy more accessible: open access for general practitioners to a physiotherapy department.让物理治疗更易获得:为全科医生提供物理治疗科的开放访问权限。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Apr 17;284(6323):1173-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6323.1173.
6
Cost-utility analysis of physiotherapy treatment compared with physiotherapy advice in low back pain.腰痛患者物理治疗与物理治疗建议的成本效用分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 May 20;31(12):1381-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000218486.13659.d5.
7
Cost effectiveness of physiotherapy, manual therapy, and general practitioner care for neck pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial.物理治疗、手法治疗及全科医生护理对颈部疼痛的成本效益:一项随机对照试验中的经济学评估
BMJ. 2003 Apr 26;326(7395):911. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7395.911.
8
Open access to orthopaedic appliances for general practitioners.向全科医生开放使用骨科器械。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Feb 21;294(6570):485-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6570.485.
9
Orthopaedic outpatient referral guidelines: experience in an English health district.骨科门诊转诊指南:英国某健康区的经验
Int J Qual Health Care. 1994 Mar;6(1):73-6. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/6.1.73.
10
Improving general practitioner access to physiotherapy: a review of the economic evidence.改善全科医生获得物理治疗服务的途径:经济证据综述。
Health Serv Manage Res. 1997 Nov;10(4):225-30. doi: 10.1177/095148489701000403.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing Access to Physical Therapy Services for People Experiencing Poverty and Homelessness: The Lighthouse Pilot Project.改善贫困和无家可归者获得物理治疗服务的机会:灯塔试点项目。
Physiother Can. 2019 Spring;71(2):176-186. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2017-85.pc.
2
Neck pain with radiculopathy.伴有神经根病的颈部疼痛。
BMJ Clin Evid. 2015 Dec 23;2015:1103.
3
The effect of patient, provider and financing regulations on the intensity of ambulatory physical therapy episodes: a multilevel analysis based on routinely available data.患者、提供者及融资监管对门诊物理治疗疗程强度的影响:基于常规可得数据的多层次分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Feb 7;15:52. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0686-6.
4
Models of integrating physical therapists into family health teams in ontario, Canada: challenges and opportunities.加拿大安大略省将物理治疗师纳入家庭健康团队的模式:挑战与机遇
Physiother Can. 2011 Summer;63(3):265-75. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2010-01. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
5
Taking responsibility for the early assessment and treatment of patients with musculoskeletal pain: a review and critical analysis.承担肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的早期评估和治疗责任:综述和批判性分析。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2012 Feb 29;14(1):205. doi: 10.1186/ar3743.
6
Neck pain.颈部疼痛。
BMJ Clin Evid. 2008 Aug 4;2008:1103.
7
Patient satisfaction with private physiotherapy for musculoskeletal pain.患者对肌肉骨骼疼痛的私人物理治疗的满意度。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Apr 15;9:50. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-50.
8
Should general practitioners refer patients directly to physical therapists?全科医生应该直接将患者转诊给物理治疗师吗?
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 May;47(418):314-8.
9
Diagnostic ultrasound: a primary care-led service?诊断性超声检查:一项由初级医疗主导的服务?
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 May;47(418):293-6.
10
Comparison between primary care physiotherapy education/advice clinics and traditional hospital based physiotherapy treatment: a randomized trial.初级保健物理治疗教育/咨询诊所与传统医院物理治疗之间的比较:一项随机试验。
Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Mar;46(404):165-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Open access by general practitioners to hospital physiotherapy departments.全科医生可使用医院理疗科服务。
Practitioner. 1982 Apr;226(1366):609-10.
2
Physiotherapy in a rural practice.农村医疗实践中的物理治疗
Practitioner. 1982 Mar;226(1365):557-8.
3
Controlled trial of an open-access physiotherapy service.一项开放式物理治疗服务的对照试验。
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984 Jul;34(264):371-6.
4
Making physiotherapy more accessible: open access for general practitioners to a physiotherapy department.让物理治疗更易获得:为全科医生提供物理治疗科的开放访问权限。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Apr 17;284(6323):1173-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6323.1173.
5
General practice orthopaedic outpatient referrals in North Staffordshire.北斯塔福德郡的全科骨科门诊转诊
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Nov 12;287(6403):1439-41. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6403.1439.

对在健康中心工作的物理治疗师的疗效及患者接受度的评估。

Evaluation of the efficacy and acceptability to patients of a physiotherapist working in a health centre.

作者信息

Hackett G I, Hudson M F, Wylie J B, Jackson A D, Small K M, Harrison P, O'Brien J, Harrison P

出版信息

Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Jan 3;294(6563):24-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6563.24.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.294.6563.24
PMID:3101786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1245044/
Abstract

The records of the first 805 patients who had been referred by general practitioners at this health centre to the attached physiotherapist were examined in November 1985, three years after the physiotherapy department was opened. Seventy per cent (549) of the patients had been treated within one week, treatment having started on the same day for 8.5% (67) of the patients. This compares with a mean of six weeks for direct access to a district general hospital that is eight miles away and between six and 13 months for the three nearest orthopaedic consultants who are 13 miles away. The most common conditions treated were knee injuries (16.5%), followed by cervical (15.5%) and shoulder (13.8%) injuries. Surprisingly, only 9% were back injuries. The non-attendance rate was 2.2% and only 7% of patients failed to complete treatment. Nearly all the patients were able to attend the clinic, only 4% requiring home treatment. By March 1986, 90 treatments a week were being carried out at a cost of 6.11 pounds per patient. Compared with official hospital figures, this represents a savings of 21,500 pounds a year for a practice of 12,000 patients.

摘要

1985年11月,在理疗科开业三年后,对该健康中心全科医生转诊至附属理疗师处的前805名患者的记录进行了检查。70%(549名)的患者在一周内得到了治疗,8.5%(67名)的患者在同一天开始治疗。相比之下,直接前往八英里外的地区综合医院平均需要六周时间,而前往13英里外的三位最近的骨科顾问处则需要六至13个月。治疗的最常见病症是膝盖损伤(16.5%),其次是颈部(15.5%)和肩部(13.8%)损伤。令人惊讶的是,只有9%是背部损伤。未就诊率为2.2%,只有7%的患者未完成治疗。几乎所有患者都能到诊所就诊,只有4%的患者需要在家治疗。到1986年3月,每周进行90次治疗,每位患者的费用为6.11英镑。与官方医院数据相比,对于一个有12000名患者的医疗机构来说,这意味着每年节省21500英镑。