Furnham A F
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986;293(6562):1607-10. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6562.1607.
A total of 449 preclinical and postclinical students from three London University medical schools completed one of nine versions of a 50 item questionnaire seeking their attitudes to nine specialties: anaesthetics, general practice, gynaecology, hospital medicine, paediatrics, pathology, psychiatry, radiology, and surgery. There were three main findings. Firstly, though item by item analysis yielded interesting and predictable differences, such as the negative attitudes to psychiatry, the students' attitudes and beliefs were multidimensional: whereas any specialty might be seen as highly positive on one dimension--for example, effectiveness--it might be seen as highly negative on another--for example, relationships with patients. Secondly, the nine specialties seemed to be discriminative on two dimensions--soft versus hard; general versus specific--such that psychiatry was seen as soft and specific, general practice soft and general, and surgery hard but neither general nor specific. Thirdly, these attitudes tended to differ between preclinical and clinical students, but only modestly, in that some extreme (positive and negative) attitudes were modified by experience.
来自伦敦三所大学医学院的449名临床前和临床后学生完成了一份50项问卷的九个版本之一,该问卷旨在了解他们对九个专业的态度:麻醉学、全科医学、妇科、医院医学、儿科学、病理学、精神病学、放射学和外科学。有三个主要发现。首先,尽管逐项分析产生了有趣且可预测的差异,比如对精神病学的负面态度,但学生的态度和信念是多维度的:任何一个专业在一个维度上可能被视为非常积极——例如有效性——而在另一个维度上可能被视为非常消极——例如与患者的关系。其次,这九个专业在两个维度上似乎具有区别性——软与硬;一般与具体——以至于精神病学被视为软且具体,全科医学软且一般,而外科学硬但既不一般也不具体。第三,这些态度在临床前和临床学生之间往往存在差异,但差异不大,因为一些极端(积极和消极)态度会因经验而有所改变。