• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国家庭和生育中心分娩:是时候在不同的医疗模式之间加强合作了。

Home and Birth Center Birth in the United States: Time for Greater Collaboration Across Models of Care.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, and the Department of Anthropology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;133(5):1033-1050. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003215.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003215
PMID:31022111
Abstract

There has been a small, but significant, increase in community births (home and birth-center births) in the United States in recent years. The rate increased by 20% from 2004 to 2008, and another 59% from 2008 to 2012, though the overall rate is still low at less than 2%. Although the United States is not the only country with a large majority of births occurring in the hospital, there are other high-resource countries where home and birth-center birth are far more common and where community midwives (those attending births at home and in birth centers) are far more central to the provision of care. In many such countries, the differences in perinatal outcomes between hospital and community births are small, and there are lower rates of maternal morbidity in the community setting. In the United States, perinatal mortality appears to be higher for community births, though there has yet to be a national study comparing outcomes across settings that controls for planned place of birth. Rates of intervention, including cesarean delivery, are significantly higher in hospital births in the United States. Compared with the United States, countries that have higher rates of community births have better integrated systems with clearer national guidelines governing risk criteria and planned birth location, as well as transfer to higher levels of care. Differences in outcomes, systems, approaches, and client motivations are important to understand, because they are critical to the processes of person-centered care and to risk reduction across all birth settings.

摘要

近年来,美国社区分娩(家庭和生育中心分娩)的数量略有增加,但意义重大。从 2004 年到 2008 年,这一比例增加了 20%,从 2008 年到 2012 年又增加了 59%,尽管总体比例仍低于 2%。虽然美国不是唯一一个大多数分娩都在医院进行的国家,但也有其他高资源国家,在这些国家,家庭和生育中心的分娩更为常见,社区助产士(在家庭和生育中心接生的助产士)在提供护理方面更为核心。在许多这样的国家,医院分娩和社区分娩的围产期结局差异较小,社区环境中的产妇发病率也较低。在美国,社区分娩的围产儿死亡率似乎更高,尽管尚未有全国性研究对不同环境下的结局进行比较,并对计划分娩地点进行控制。在美国,医院分娩的干预率(包括剖腹产)明显更高。与美国相比,社区分娩率较高的国家拥有更完善的系统,更明确的国家指导方针,规定了风险标准和计划分娩地点,以及向更高水平的护理的转移。了解结局、系统、方法和客户动机方面的差异非常重要,因为这些差异是在所有分娩环境中实现以人为本的护理和降低风险过程的关键。

相似文献

1
Home and Birth Center Birth in the United States: Time for Greater Collaboration Across Models of Care.美国家庭和生育中心分娩:是时候在不同的医疗模式之间加强合作了。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;133(5):1033-1050. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003215.
2
Rural community birth: Maternal and neonatal outcomes for planned community births among rural women in the United States, 2004-2009.农村社区分娩:2004 - 2009年美国农村妇女计划在社区分娩的孕产妇和新生儿结局
Birth. 2018 Jun;45(2):120-129. doi: 10.1111/birt.12322. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
3
Birth Outcomes for Planned Home and Licensed Freestanding Birth Center Births in Washington State.华盛顿州计划家庭分娩和持照独立分娩中心分娩的母婴结局。
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov 1;138(5):693-702. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004578.
4
Outcomes of care for 16,924 planned home births in the United States: the Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009.美国16924例计划在家分娩的护理结局:北美助产士联盟统计项目,2004年至2009年
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014 Jan-Feb;59(1):17-27. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12172. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
5
Breech birth at home: outcomes of 60 breech and 109 cephalic planned home and birth center births.在家中臀位分娩:60 例臀位和 109 例头位计划在家中和分娩中心分娩的结局。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2033-5.
6
Apgar score of 0 at 5 minutes and neonatal seizures or serious neurologic dysfunction in relation to birth setting.出生时 Apgar 评分为 0 分,且与分娩环境相关的新生儿癫痫发作或严重神经功能障碍。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;209(4):323.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.025. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
7
Perinatal risks of planned home births in the United States.美国计划在家分娩的围产期风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;212(3):350.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
8
Trends and Characteristics of United States Out-of-Hospital Births 2004-2014: New Information on Risk Status and Access to Care.2004 - 2014年美国院外分娩的趋势与特征:关于风险状况及医疗服务可及性的新信息
Birth. 2016 Jun;43(2):116-24. doi: 10.1111/birt.12228. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
9
Differences in optimality index between planned place of birth in a birth centre and alternative planned places of birth, a nationwide prospective cohort study in The Netherlands: results of the Dutch Birth Centre Study.荷兰全国性前瞻性队列研究:出生中心计划分娩地点与其他计划分娩地点的最优性指数差异:荷兰出生中心研究结果
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 16;7(11):e016958. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016958.
10
Characteristics, interventions, and outcomes of women who used a birthing pool: a prospective observational study.使用分娩池的女性的特征、干预措施和结局:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Birth. 2012 Sep;39(3):192-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2012.00548.x. Epub 2012 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Experience of decision-making for home breech birth: An interpretive description.臀位在家分娩的决策经验:一项诠释性描述
SSM Qual Res Health. 2024 Jun;5:100397. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100397. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
2
Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with breech presentation in planned community (home and birth center) births in the United States: A prospective observational cohort study.美国计划社区(家庭和生育中心)分娩中臀位与母婴结局的关系:一项前瞻性观察性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 22;19(7):e0305587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305587. eCollection 2024.
3
Smooth Transitions: Enhancing Interprofessional Collaboration when Planned Community Births Transfer to Hospital Care.
平稳过渡:计划社区分娩转至医院照护时加强跨专业协作。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2022 Nov;67(6):701-706. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13441. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
4
Loss of Obstetric Services in Rural Appalachia: A Qualitative Study of Community Perceptions.阿巴拉契亚农村地区产科服务的缺失:关于社区认知的定性研究
J Appalach Health. 2021 May 3;3(2):4-17. doi: 10.13023/jah.0302.02. eCollection 2021.
5
Are perinatal quality collaboratives collaborating enough? How including all birth settings can drive needed improvement in the United States maternity care system.围产期质量协作组织的协作是否足够?纳入所有分娩场所如何推动美国孕产妇护理系统实现必要的改进。
Birth. 2022 Mar;49(1):3-10. doi: 10.1111/birt.12600. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
6
Birth Outcomes for Planned Home and Licensed Freestanding Birth Center Births in Washington State.华盛顿州计划家庭分娩和持照独立分娩中心分娩的母婴结局。
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov 1;138(5):693-702. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004578.
7
The Impacts of COVID-19 on US Maternity Care Practices: A Followup Study.新冠疫情对美国孕产妇护理实践的影响:一项随访研究。
Front Sociol. 2021 May 27;6:655401. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.655401. eCollection 2021.
8
Maternity Care Preferences for Future Pregnancies Among United States Childbearers: The Impacts of COVID-19.美国育龄人群对未来怀孕的孕产护理偏好:新冠疫情的影响
Front Sociol. 2021 Feb 18;6:611407. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.611407. eCollection 2021.
9
Home Birth in the Era of COVID-19: Counseling and Preparation for Pregnant Persons Living with HIV.COVID-19时代的家庭分娩:为感染HIV的孕妇提供咨询与准备
Am J Perinatol. 2020 Aug;37(10):1038-1043. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712513. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
10
Low-Risk Planned Out-of-Hospital Births: Characteristics and Perinatal Outcomes in Different Italian Birth Settings.低风险计划的院外分娩:不同意大利分娩环境中的特征和围产儿结局。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 15;17(8):2718. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082718.