• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Are perinatal quality collaboratives collaborating enough? How including all birth settings can drive needed improvement in the United States maternity care system.围产期质量协作组织的协作是否足够？纳入所有分娩场所如何推动美国孕产妇护理系统实现必要的改进。
Birth. 2022 Mar;49(1):3-10. doi: 10.1111/birt.12600. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
2
How State Perinatal Quality Collaboratives Can Improve Rural Maternity Care.州围产期质量协作组织如何改善农村孕产妇护理。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Dec 1;65(4):848-855. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000748. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
3
The Hard Work of Improving Outcomes for Mothers and Babies: Obstetric and Perinatal Quality Improvement Initiatives Make a Difference at the Hospital, State, and National Levels.改善母婴结局的艰苦工作：产科和围产期质量改进举措在医院、州和国家层面发挥作用。
Clin Perinatol. 2017 Sep;44(3):511-528. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2017.05.007.
4
The National Network of State Perinatal Quality Collaboratives: A Growing Movement to Improve Maternal and Infant Health.国家围产期质量合作组织网络：一个不断壮大的改善母婴健康的运动。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Mar;27(3):221-226. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.6941.
5
[Satisfaction with perinatal care in Vysočina region in the period between October 2013 and September 2014].[2013年10月至2014年9月期间维索基纳地区围产期护理满意度]
Ceska Gynekol. 2015 Dec;80(6):426-35.
6
The Myth of Women's Choices in U.S. Maternity Care, Part 2.美国孕产妇护理中女性选择的神话，第二部分。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2018 Sep;47(5):589-590. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2018.08.001.
7
2020 vision for a high-quality, high-value maternity care system.高质量、高价值的产妇护理体系的 2020 愿景。
Womens Health Issues. 2010 Jan-Feb;20(1 Suppl):S7-17. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2009.11.006.
8
Creating a collaborative culture in maternity care.创建产科护理协作文化。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2010 May-Jun;55(3):250-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2010.01.004.
9
Letter from North America: rapidly evolving national maternity care landscape in the United States.来自北美的信：美国国家孕产妇护理格局的快速演变
Birth. 2012 Sep;39(3):263-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2012.00556.x.
10
Medical defence organisations and quality improvement in maternity care.
BJOG. 2019 Nov;126(12):1445. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15900. Epub 2019 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Smooth Transitions: Enhancing Interprofessional Collaboration when Planned Community Births Transfer to Hospital Care.平稳过渡：计划社区分娩转至医院照护时加强跨专业协作。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2022 Nov;67(6):701-706. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13441. Epub 2022 Nov 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Birth Outcomes for Planned Home and Licensed Freestanding Birth Center Births in Washington State.华盛顿州计划家庭分娩和持照独立分娩中心分娩的母婴结局。
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov 1;138(5):693-702. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004578.
2
Neonatal outcomes of births in freestanding birth centers and hospitals in the United States, 2016-2019.2016-2019 年美国独立分娩中心和医院分娩的新生儿结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jan;226(1):116.e1-116.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.093. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
3
The role of midwifery and other international insights for maternity care in the United States: An analysis of four countries.产科学和其他国际经验对美国产科护理的作用：四个国家的分析。
Birth. 2020 Dec;47(4):332-345. doi: 10.1111/birt.12504. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
4
Maternal outcomes and birth interventions among women who begin labour intending to give birth at home compared to women of low obstetrical risk who intend to give birth in hospital: A systematic review and meta-analyses.与打算在医院分娩的低产科风险女性相比，打算在家分娩的女性的孕产妇结局和分娩干预措施：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Apr 5;21:100319. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100319. eCollection 2020 Apr.
5
Improving the Experience of Care: Results of the American Association of Birth Centers Strong Start Client Experience of Care Registry Pilot Program, 2015-2016.改善护理体验：美国分娩中心协会“稳健起步”客户护理体验登记试点项目（2015 - 2016年）的结果
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2020 Jan/Mar;34(1):27-37. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000454.
6
Perinatal or neonatal mortality among women who intend at the onset of labour to give birth at home compared to women of low obstetrical risk who intend to give birth in hospital: A systematic review and meta-analyses.与打算在医院分娩的低产科风险女性相比，打算在家分娩的女性围产期或新生儿死亡率：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2019 Jul 25;14:59-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.07.005. eCollection 2019 Sep.
7
Comparison of Midwifery and Obstetric Care in Low-Risk Hospital Births.低危医院分娩中助产护理与产科护理的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Nov;134(5):1056-1065. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003521.
8
The Giving Voice to Mothers study: inequity and mistreatment during pregnancy and childbirth in the United States.《母亲发声研究》：美国妊娠和分娩期间的不平等与虐待现象。
Reprod Health. 2019 Jun 11;16(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0729-2.
9
Strong Start in birth centers: Socio-demographic characteristics, care processes, and outcomes for mothers and newborns.生育中心的良好开端：母亲和新生儿的社会人口学特征、护理过程和结局。
Birth. 2019 Jun;46(2):234-243. doi: 10.1111/birt.12433.
10
Home and Birth Center Birth in the United States: Time for Greater Collaboration Across Models of Care.美国家庭和生育中心分娩：是时候在不同的医疗模式之间加强合作了。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;133(5):1033-1050. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003215.

Are perinatal quality collaboratives collaborating enough? How including all birth settings can drive needed improvement in the United States maternity care system.

作者信息

Levine Audrey, Souter Vivienne, Sakala Carol

机构信息

Smooth Transitions, Foundation for Health Care Quality, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Obstetrical Care Outcomes Assessment Program, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Birth. 2022 Mar;49(1):3-10. doi: 10.1111/birt.12600. Epub 2021 Oct 26.

DOI:10.1111/birt.12600
PMID:34698401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9298427/
Abstract
摘要