• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科罗拉多州 2004 年至 2013 年间最后一次活产的女性的青少年产后间隔期。

Adolescent Interpregnancy Interval in Colorado Among Women With a Last Live Birth Between 2004 and 2013.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado.

Tri-County Health Department, Greenwood Village, Colorado.

出版信息

J Adolesc Health. 2019 Aug;65(2):289-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.02.007
PMID:31028007
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7291708/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of the article was to determine risk factors associated with interpregnancy interval (IPI) and how IPI is associated with subsequent pregnancy outcomes.

METHODS

We performed bivariate and multivariable analyses of the Colorado Birth Certificate Registry data from women with a last live birth from 2004 to 2013, among Coloradan women aged 19 years and younger.

RESULTS

Our multivariate analysis found that older adolescents aged 17-19 years had a reduced likelihood of an IPI >18 months (odds ratio [OR] .8; confidence interval [CI] .7-.9). Self-identifying as Hispanic increased the likelihood of an IPI <18 months, whereas delivering during or after 2009 or having Medicaid insurance significantly increased the odds that an adolescent would have an IPI >18 months (OR 1.5 [CI: 1.4-1.6]; OR 1.2 [CI: 1.1-1.2]; OR 1.5 [CI: 1.4-1.6], respectively). We found that an IPI >18 months was associated with the following dependent variables in unique logistic regressions adjusted for age, ethnicity, year of last live birth, and insurance status: reduced risk of neonatal complications (OR .9 [CI: .8-.9]), reduced risk of overweight/obesity (OR .9 [CI: .8-.9]), and an increased likelihood of normal birthweight (OR 1.2 [CI: 1.1-1.4]), term birth (OR 1.3 [CI: 1.1-1.4]), and attending 14 or more prenatal visits (OR 1.3 [CI: 1.2-1.4].

CONCLUSIONS

Having an IPI >18 months in adolescent Coloradan women is associated with an increased likelihood of prenatal care attendance, term birth, and normal birthweight and with a reduced likelihood of neonatal complications.

摘要

目的

本文旨在确定与妊娠间隔(interpregnancy interval,IPI)相关的风险因素,以及 IPI 如何与后续妊娠结局相关联。

方法

我们对 2004 年至 2013 年间科罗拉多州出生证明登记处数据中最后一次活产的 19 岁及以下科罗拉多州女性进行了单变量和多变量分析。

结果

我们的多变量分析发现,17-19 岁的青少年妊娠间隔大于 18 个月的可能性较低(比值比 [OR].8;95%置信区间 [CI].7-.9)。自我认同为西班牙裔增加了妊娠间隔小于 18 个月的可能性,而在 2009 年或之后分娩或拥有医疗补助保险则显著增加了青少年妊娠间隔大于 18 个月的几率(OR 1.5 [CI: 1.4-1.6];OR 1.2 [CI: 1.1-1.2];OR 1.5 [CI: 1.4-1.6])。我们发现,在调整年龄、种族、最后一次活产年份和保险状况后,妊娠间隔大于 18 个月与以下独立逻辑回归中的因变量相关:新生儿并发症风险降低(OR.9 [CI:.8-.9])、超重/肥胖风险降低(OR.9 [CI:.8-.9])、正常出生体重的可能性增加(OR 1.2 [CI: 1.1-1.4])、足月产(OR 1.3 [CI: 1.1-1.4])和接受 14 次或更多产前检查(OR 1.3 [CI: 1.2-1.4])。

结论

在科罗拉多州青少年女性中,妊娠间隔大于 18 个月与增加产前护理就诊、足月产和正常出生体重的可能性相关,与新生儿并发症的可能性降低相关。

相似文献

1
Adolescent Interpregnancy Interval in Colorado Among Women With a Last Live Birth Between 2004 and 2013.科罗拉多州 2004 年至 2013 年间最后一次活产的女性的青少年产后间隔期。
J Adolesc Health. 2019 Aug;65(2):289-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
2
Association of Expanded Prenatal Care Coverage for Immigrant Women With Postpartum Contraception and Short Interpregnancy Interval Births.移民妇女扩大产前保健覆盖范围与产后避孕和短间隔生育的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2118912. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.18912.
3
Interpregnancy interval after live birth or pregnancy termination and estimated risk of preterm birth: a retrospective cohort study.活产或终止妊娠后的妊娠间隔与早产的估计风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
BJOG. 2016 Nov;123(12):2009-2017. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14165. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
4
Effect of interpregnancy interval on adverse pregnancy outcomes in northern Tanzania: a registry-based retrospective cohort study.妊娠间隔对坦桑尼亚北部不良妊娠结局的影响:一项基于登记处的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jun 7;16(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0929-5.
5
The effect of a very short interpregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes following a previous pregnancy loss.极短的再次妊娠间隔对既往有过妊娠丢失后的妊娠结局的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;212(3):375.e1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.09.020. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
6
Interpregnancy Interval After Healthy Live Birth and Subsequent Spontaneous Abortion.健康活产后的妊娠间隔与随后的自然流产。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2417397. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.17397.
7
Coverage of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception has improved birth intervals for at-risk populations.立即产后长效可逆避孕措施的覆盖范围改善了高危人群的生育间隔。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4S):S886.e1-S886.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1282. Epub 2019 Dec 14.
8
Interpregnancy Interval and Childbirth Outcomes in California, 2007-2009.2007 - 2009年加利福尼亚州的妊娠间隔与分娩结局
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Nov;20(Suppl 1):43-51. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2180-0.
9
Effect of Interpregnancy Interval on Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Southern China: A Retrospective Cohort Study, 2000-2015.妊娠间隔对中国南方围产期不良结局的影响:一项2000 - 2015年的回顾性队列研究
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;32(2):131-140. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12432. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
10
Interpregnancy Interval After Clinical Pregnancy Loss and Outcomes of the Next Frozen Embryo Transfer.临床妊娠丢失后再次妊娠间隔时间与下一次冻融胚胎移植结局的关系
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2340709. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.40709.

引用本文的文献

1
Birth-Related Outcomes for Second Children Following Home Visiting Program Enrollment for New Parents of First Children.首个孩子的新父母参加家访项目后第二个孩子的出生相关结局
Matern Child Health J. 2022 Apr;26(4):941-952. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03365-3. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
2
Postpartum Contraceptive Use Among Denver-Based Adolescents and Young Adults: Association with Subsequent Repeat Delivery.丹佛地区青少年和年轻成年人产后避孕措施的使用情况:与后续再次分娩的关联
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2020 Aug;33(4):393-397.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2020.03.012. Epub 2020 Apr 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Brief Interpregnancy Interval: Are 75% of Adolescent Mothers Unaware of the Prematurity Risk?孕间期过短:75%的青少年母亲是否未意识到早产风险?
Am J Public Health. 2018 Feb;108(S1):S11-S12. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304129.
2
Adverse Birth Outcomes in Colorado: Assessing the Impact of a Statewide Initiative to Prevent Unintended Pregnancy.科罗拉多州的不良出生结局:评估一项全州范围内预防意外怀孕倡议的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Sep;105(9):e60-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302711. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
3
Influence of interpregnancy interval on neonatal morbidity.孕期间隔对新生儿发病率的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;212(3):386.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.017. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
4
Game change in Colorado: widespread use of long-acting reversible contraceptives and rapid decline in births among young, low-income women.科罗拉多州的重大变革:长效可逆避孕药的广泛使用以及年轻低收入女性生育率的迅速下降。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014 Sep;46(3):125-32. doi: 10.1363/46e1714. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
5
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 121: Long-acting reversible contraception: Implants and intrauterine devices.美国妇产科医师学会实践公告第121号:长效可逆避孕法:皮下埋植剂和宫内节育器
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;118(1):184-196. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318227f05e.
6
Effect of interpregnancy interval on adverse perinatal outcomes--a national study.妊娠间隔对不良围产结局的影响——一项全国性研究。
Contraception. 2009 Dec;80(6):512-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.06.006. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
7
Effects of birth spacing on maternal health: a systematic review.生育间隔对孕产妇健康的影响:一项系统综述
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Apr;196(4):297-308. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.055.
8
Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis.生育间隔与围产期不良结局风险:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2006 Apr 19;295(15):1809-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.15.1809.
9
Predictors of repeat pregnancy in a program for pregnant teens.青少年怀孕项目中再次怀孕的预测因素。
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2003 Apr;16(2):77-81. doi: 10.1016/s1083-3188(03)00011-1.
10
Changing paternity and time since last pregnancy; the impact on pre-eclampsia risk. A study of 547 238 women with and without previous pre-eclampsia.父亲身份的改变及距上次怀孕的时间;对先兆子痫风险的影响。一项针对547238名有或无先兆子痫病史女性的研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2001 Dec;30(6):1317-22. doi: 10.1093/ije/30.6.1317.