• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2007 - 2009年加利福尼亚州的妊娠间隔与分娩结局

Interpregnancy Interval and Childbirth Outcomes in California, 2007-2009.

作者信息

Cofer Flojaune Griffin, Fridman Moshe, Lawton Elizabeth, Korst Lisa M, Nicholas Lisa, Gregory Kimberly D

机构信息

Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Division, California Department of Public Health, 1615 Capitol Avenue, MS 8306, P.O. Box 997420, Sacramento, CA, 95899-7420, USA.

AMF Consulting, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Matern Child Health J. 2016 Nov;20(Suppl 1):43-51. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2180-0.

DOI:10.1007/s10995-016-2180-0
PMID:27565663
Abstract

Objectives The goals of interconception care are to optimize women's health and encourage adequate spacing between pregnancies. Our study calculated trends in interpregnancy interval (IPI) patterns and measured the association of differing intervals with birth outcomes in California. Methods Women with "non-first birth" deliveries in California hospitals from 2007 to 2009 were identified in a linked birth certificate and patient discharge dataset and divided into three IPI birth categories: <6, 6-17, and 18-50 months. Trends over the study period were tested using the Cochran-Armitage two-sided linear trend test. Chi square tests were used to test the association between IPI and patient characteristics and selected singleton adverse birth outcomes. Results Of 645,529 deliveries identified as non-first births, 5.6 % had an IPI <6 months, 33.1 % had an IPI of 6-17 months, and 61.3 % had an IPI of 18-50 months. The prevalence of IPI <6 months declined over the 3-year period (5.8 % in 2007 to 5.3 % in 2009, trend p value <0.0001).Women with an IPI <6 months had a significantly higher prevalence of early preterm birth (<34 weeks), low birthweight (<2500 g), neonatal complications, neonatal death and severe maternal complications than women with a 6-17 month or 18-50 month IPI (p < 0.005). Comparing those with a 6-17 month vs 18-50 month IPI, there were increased early preterm births and decreased maternal complications, complicated delivery, and stillbirth/intrauterine fetal deaths among those with a shorter IPI. Conclusions for Practice In California, women with an IPI <6 months were at increased risk for several birth outcomes, including composite morbidity measures.

摘要

目标 孕前保健的目标是优化女性健康状况并鼓励妊娠之间有足够的间隔时间。我们的研究计算了妊娠间隔期(IPI)模式的趋势,并测定了加利福尼亚州不同间隔时间与分娩结局之间的关联。方法 在一份关联的出生证明和患者出院数据集里,识别出2007年至2009年在加利福尼亚州医院进行“非头胎”分娩的女性,并将其分为三个IPI分娩类别:<6个月、6 - 17个月和18 - 50个月。使用 Cochr an - Armitage双侧线性趋势检验来检验研究期间的趋势。卡方检验用于检验IPI与患者特征以及选定的单胎不良分娩结局之间的关联。结果 在645,529例被确定为非头胎的分娩中,5.6%的IPI<6个月,33.1%的IPI为6 - 17个月,61.3%的IPI为18 - 50个月。在这3年期间,IPI<6个月的患病率有所下降(从2007年的5.8%降至2009年的5.3%,趋势p值<0.0001)。与IPI为6 - 17个月或18 - 50个月的女性相比,IPI<6个月的女性早期早产(<34周)、低出生体重(<2500克)、新生儿并发症、新生儿死亡和严重孕产妇并发症的患病率显著更高(p<0.005)。比较IPI为6 - 17个月与18 - 50个月的女性,IPI较短的女性中早期早产增加,而孕产妇并发症、复杂分娩以及死产/宫内胎儿死亡减少。实践结论 在加利福尼亚州,IPI<6个月的女性出现多种分娩结局的风险增加,包括综合发病率指标。

相似文献

1
Interpregnancy Interval and Childbirth Outcomes in California, 2007-2009.2007 - 2009年加利福尼亚州的妊娠间隔与分娩结局
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Nov;20(Suppl 1):43-51. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2180-0.
2
Interpregnancy interval after live birth or pregnancy termination and estimated risk of preterm birth: a retrospective cohort study.活产或终止妊娠后的妊娠间隔与早产的估计风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
BJOG. 2016 Nov;123(12):2009-2017. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14165. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
3
Short interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes in women of advanced age: a population-based study.短间隔妊娠与高龄产妇不良生育结局:基于人群的研究。
Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Sep;28(9):605-611. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
4
Effect of interpregnancy interval on adverse pregnancy outcomes in northern Tanzania: a registry-based retrospective cohort study.妊娠间隔对坦桑尼亚北部不良妊娠结局的影响:一项基于登记处的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jun 7;16(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0929-5.
5
Interpregnancy intervals and the risk for infant mortality: a case control study of Arizona infants 2003-2007.妊娠间隔与婴儿死亡率的关系:亚利桑那州 2003-2007 年婴儿病例对照研究。
Matern Child Health J. 2013 May;17(4):646-53. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1041-8.
6
Influence of interpregnancy interval on birth timing.孕期间隔对分娩时机的影响。
BJOG. 2014 Dec;121(13):1633-40. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12891. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
7
Effect of Interpregnancy Interval on Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Southern China: A Retrospective Cohort Study, 2000-2015.妊娠间隔对中国南方围产期不良结局的影响:一项2000 - 2015年的回顾性队列研究
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;32(2):131-140. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12432. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
8
Factors associated with short interpregnancy interval among women treated with in vitro fertilization.与接受体外受精治疗的女性短间隔妊娠相关的因素。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Sep;35(9):1595-1602. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1261-y. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
9
Association between interpregnancy interval and adverse perinatal outcomes among subsequent twin pregnancies: a nationwide population-based study.两次妊娠间隔时间与后续双胞胎妊娠不良围生结局的关系:一项全国性基于人群的研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Sep;6(9):101439. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101439. Epub 2024 Jul 28.
10
Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Perinatal Outcomes: A Record-Linkage Study Using the Manitoba Population Research Data Repository.妊娠间隔与不良围产期结局:一项使用曼尼托巴人口研究数据存储库的记录链接研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017 Jun;39(6):420-433. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The association between interpregnancy intervals and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.孕期间隔与早产之间的关联:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 28;25(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07259-y.
2
Association between interpregnancy interval and adverse perinatal outcomes according to maternal age in the context of China's two-child policy.在中国二孩政策背景下,妊娠间隔与不同孕产妇年龄的不良围产期结局之间的关联。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jan 27;25(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07136-8.
3
Interpregnancy interval, air pollution, and the risk of low birth weight: a retrospective study in China.

本文引用的文献

1
Short Interpregnancy Intervals: An Evidence-Based Guide for Clinicians.短间隔妊娠:临床医生的循证指南。
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2015 Jul;70(7):458-64. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000195.
2
The relationship between mode of delivery and sexual health outcomes after childbirth.分娩方式与产后性健康结局的关系。
J Sex Med. 2015 May;12(5):1212-20. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12883. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
3
Advocating for immediate postpartum LARC: increasing access, improving outcomes, and decreasing cost.提倡产后即时长效可逆避孕法:增加可及性、改善结局并降低成本。
妊娠间隔、空气污染与低出生体重风险:中国的一项回顾性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 17;24(1):2529. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19711-3.
4
Short Interpregnancy Intervals Among Women Experiencing Homelessness in Colorado.科罗拉多州无家可归妇女的短孕期间隔。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2350242. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.50242.
5
Birth spacing and risk of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.生育间隔与不良妊娠和出生结局风险:系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Dec;102(12):1618-1633. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14648. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
6
Interpregnancy Interval After Stillbirth and Adverse Perinatal Outcomes.两次妊娠的间隔时间与不良围生结局。
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jun 1;141(6):1203-1205. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005188. Epub 2023 May 3.
7
Interactions between long interpregnancy interval and advanced maternal age on neonatal outcomes.孕间期延长与高龄产妇对新生儿结局的相互作用。
World J Pediatr. 2023 Dec;19(12):1155-1161. doi: 10.1007/s12519-023-00728-4. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
8
Parental Perceptions of Counseling Regarding Interpregnancy Interval after Stillbirth or Neonatal Death.父母对胎儿或新生儿死亡后再次妊娠间隔时间咨询的看法。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e1599-e1605. doi: 10.1055/a-2053-8189. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
9
The effects of birth spacing on early childhood development in high-income nations: A systematic review.出生间隔对高收入国家幼儿发育的影响:一项系统综述。
Front Pediatr. 2022 Nov 25;10:851700. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.851700. eCollection 2022.
10
Association of Interpregnancy Interval With Adverse Birth Outcomes.妊娠间隔与不良分娩结局的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2216658. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.16658.
Contraception. 2014 Nov;90(5):468-71. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
4
Monitoring childbirth morbidity using hospital discharge data: further development and application of a composite measure.利用医院出院数据监测分娩发病率:综合指标的进一步制定与应用。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;211(3):268.e1-268.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
5
Trends in maternal morbidity before and during pregnancy in California.加利福尼亚州妊娠前后产妇发病率的变化趋势。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S49-57. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301583. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
6
Reproductive performance in the next pregnancy for nulliparous women with history of first trimester spontaneous abortion.有早期自发性流产史的初产妇下次妊娠的生殖性能。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Oct;288(4):939-44. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2809-9. Epub 2013 Apr 7.
7
Effects of birth spacing on maternal, perinatal, infant, and child health: a systematic review of causal mechanisms.出生间隔对母婴、围产儿、婴儿和儿童健康的影响:因果机制的系统评价。
Stud Fam Plann. 2012 Jun;43(2):93-114. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2012.00308.x.
8
Interpregnancy interval and obstetrical complications.妊娠间隔与产科并发症。
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2012 Sep;67(9):584-96. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e31826b2c3e.
9
Attitudes toward birth spacing among low-income, postpartum women: a qualitative analysis.低收入产后妇女对生育间隔的态度:定性分析。
Matern Child Health J. 2012 Oct;16(7):1440-6. doi: 10.1007/s10995-011-0911-9.
10
The impact of birth spacing on subsequent feto-infant outcomes among community enrollees of a federal healthy start project.生育间隔对联邦健康起点项目社区参与者后续胎儿-婴儿结局的影响。
J Community Health. 2012 Feb;37(1):137-42. doi: 10.1007/s10900-011-9427-x.