• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

qSOFA 和 SOFA 评分对社区获得性和医疗保健相关性肺炎的疗效和准确性作为预后工具。

Efficacy and accuracy of qSOFA and SOFA scores as prognostic tools for community-acquired and healthcare-associated pneumonia.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Aichi, Japan; Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Aichi, Japan.

Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Infect Dis. 2019 Jul;84:89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.04.020. Epub 2019 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2019.04.020
PMID:31028877
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Japanese Respiratory Society recently updated its prognostic guidelines for pneumonia, recommending that pneumonia severity be evaluated using the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and quick SOFA (qSOFA) scoring systems in a therapeutic strategy flowchart. However, the efficacy and accuracy of these tools are still unknown.

METHODS

All patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) who were admitted to the study institution between 2014 and 2017 were enrolled in this study. Pneumonia severity on admission was evaluated by A-DROP, CURB-65, PSI, I-ROAD, qSOFA, and SOFA scoring systems. Prognostic factors for 30-day mortality were also analyzed.

RESULTS

This study included 406 patients, 257 male (63%) and 149 female (37%). The median age was 79 years (range 19-103 years). The 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates were both 5%. With respect to the diagnostic value of the predictive assessments for 30-day mortality, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) value for the SOFA score was 0.769 for CAP patients and 0.774 for HCAP patients. Further, the AUROC values for the SOFA score in CAP and HCAP patients with a qSOFA score ≥2 were 0.829 and 0.784, respectively, for 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

qSOFA and SOFA scores were able to correctly evaluate the severity of CAP and HCAP.

摘要

背景

日本呼吸学会最近更新了其肺炎预后指南,建议在治疗策略流程图中使用序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和快速 SOFA(qSOFA)评分系统评估肺炎严重程度。然而,这些工具的疗效和准确性仍不清楚。

方法

本研究纳入了 2014 年至 2017 年期间在研究机构住院的所有社区获得性肺炎(CAP)和医疗保健相关性肺炎(HCAP)患者。入院时肺炎严重程度采用 A-DROP、CURB-65、PSI、I-ROAD、qSOFA 和 SOFA 评分系统进行评估。还分析了 30 天死亡率的预后因素。

结果

本研究共纳入 406 例患者,其中男 257 例(63%),女 149 例(37%)。中位年龄为 79 岁(19-103 岁)。30 天和住院死亡率均为 5%。关于预测评估对 30 天死亡率的诊断价值,SOFA 评分的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUROC)值为 CAP 患者 0.769 和 HCAP 患者 0.774。此外,qSOFA 评分≥2 的 CAP 和 HCAP 患者的 SOFA 评分 AUROC 值分别为 0.829 和 0.784,用于预测 30 天死亡率。

结论

qSOFA 和 SOFA 评分能够正确评估 CAP 和 HCAP 的严重程度。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and accuracy of qSOFA and SOFA scores as prognostic tools for community-acquired and healthcare-associated pneumonia.qSOFA 和 SOFA 评分对社区获得性和医疗保健相关性肺炎的疗效和准确性作为预后工具。
Int J Infect Dis. 2019 Jul;84:89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.04.020. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
2
Efficacy of the quick sequential organ failure assessment for predicting clinical outcomes among community-acquired pneumonia patients presenting in the emergency department.快速序贯器官衰竭评估在预测急诊科就诊的社区获得性肺炎患者临床结局中的疗效。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 29;20(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05044-0.
3
Could qSOFA and SOFA score be correctly estimating the severity of healthcare-associated pneumonia?qSOFA和SOFA评分能否正确评估医疗相关肺炎的严重程度?
J Infect Chemother. 2018 Mar;24(3):228-231. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
4
New Sepsis Definition (Sepsis-3) and Community-acquired Pneumonia Mortality. A Validation and Clinical Decision-Making Study.新的脓毒症定义 (Sepsis-3) 与社区获得性肺炎死亡率。一项验证和临床决策研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Nov 15;196(10):1287-1297. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201611-2262OC.
5
Stratified and prognostic value of admission lactate and severity scores in patients with community-acquired pneumonia in emergency department: A single-center retrospective cohort study.急诊科社区获得性肺炎患者入院时乳酸水平及严重程度评分的分层与预后价值:一项单中心回顾性队列研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Oct;98(41):e17479. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017479.
6
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
7
Risk stratification and prediction value of procalcitonin and clinical severity scores for community-acquired pneumonia in ED.降钙素原和临床严重程度评分对急诊科社区获得性肺炎的风险分层和预测价值。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;36(12):2155-2160. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.03.050. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
8
Early identification of severe community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective observational study.早期识别严重社区获得性肺炎:一项回顾性观察研究。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2019 Jun 5;6(1):e000438. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000438. eCollection 2019.
9
Performances of prognostic scoring systems in patients with healthcare-associated pneumonia.预测评分系统在医疗相关性肺炎患者中的表现。
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Mar;56(5):625-32. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis970. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
10
Utility of the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in Japanese patients with nursing- and healthcare-associated pneumonia.快速序贯器官衰竭评估在日本护理和医疗保健相关性肺炎患者中的应用。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2019 Mar;19(3):177-183. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13581. Epub 2018 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of astaxanthin as an adjunctive therapy in community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial.虾青素作为社区获得性肺炎辅助治疗的抗炎和抗氧化作用:一项随机对照试验。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Aug 7;16:1621308. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1621308. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluating the predictive performance of PIRO score against six clinical prediction scores for COVID-19 outcomes in the emergency department.评估急诊科中PIRO评分对COVID-19结局的六种临床预测评分的预测性能。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 29;15(1):27657. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13131-y.
3
The use of machine learning based models to predict the severity of community acquired pneumonia in hospitalised patients: A systematic review.
使用基于机器学习的模型预测住院患者社区获得性肺炎的严重程度:一项系统评价。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2025 Feb 3;26(2):237-248. doi: 10.1177/17511437251315319. eCollection 2025 May.
4
A 15-Year Observational Cohort of Acute Empyema at a Single-Center in Japan.日本单中心急性脓胸的15年观察队列研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Dec 11;13(12):1205. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13121205.
5
Comparative Effectiveness of CURB-65 and qSOFA Scores in Predicting Pneumonia Outcomes: A Systematic Review.CURB-65和qSOFA评分在预测肺炎预后中的比较有效性:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Oct 13;16(10):e71394. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71394. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
Impact of antibiotic changes on hospital stay and treatment duration in community-acquired pneumonia.抗生素变化对社区获得性肺炎住院时间和治疗持续时间的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 30;14(1):22669. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73304-z.
7
Modified R-GLIM Score Is a Good Prognostic Tool to Predict a Long-Term Prognosis in Poor Conditioned Elderly Patients with Aspiration Pneumonia, a Pilot Study.改良R-GLIM评分是预测状况不佳的老年吸入性肺炎患者长期预后的良好预后工具:一项初步研究
Geriatrics (Basel). 2024 Sep 12;9(5):118. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics9050118.
8
Antibiotic therapy for bacterial pneumonia.细菌性肺炎的抗生素治疗。
J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2024 Jul 30;10(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40780-024-00367-5.
9
Utility of pneumonia severity assessment tools for mortality prediction in healthcare-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.用于医疗相关性肺炎死亡率预测的肺炎严重程度评估工具的实用性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 5;14(1):12964. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63618-3.
10
Time‑dependent ROC curve analysis to determine the predictive capacity of seven clinical scales for mortality in patients with COVID‑19: Study of a hospital cohort with very high mortality.采用时间依赖性ROC曲线分析来确定七种临床量表对COVID-19患者死亡率的预测能力:一项高死亡率医院队列研究。
Biomed Rep. 2024 May 9;20(6):100. doi: 10.3892/br.2024.1788. eCollection 2024 Jun.