EHESP Rennes, Université Sorbonne Paris Cité, France; Unité des Virus Emergents (UVE: Aix-Marseille Univ - IRD 190 - Inserm 1207 - IHU Méditerranée Infection), Marseille, France.
EHESP Rennes, Université Sorbonne Paris Cité, France; Unité des Virus Emergents (UVE: Aix-Marseille Univ - IRD 190 - Inserm 1207 - IHU Méditerranée Infection), Marseille, France.
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jun;230:184-193. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
Although greater attention has been recently given to the ecological determinants of health behaviours, we still do not know much about the behavioural changes induced by the spread of infectiousdiseases.
In this study, we took advantage of a large epidemic of chikungunya, an emerging mosquito-borne disease, in French Guiana to examine the dynamic interaction between risk-related perceptions and behaviours that occurs in response to a disease outbreak. In particular, we tested empirically the assumption that both risk perceptions and health behaviours were elastic with respect to prevalence of chikungunya.
A representative sample of French Guianan (N=434) was interviewed in January 2015 just after the peak of the epidemic, and again 2 months later. Participants were asked about their perceptions of the threat, as well as their engagement in a range of protective behaviours promoted by the regional health authorities to control the spread of the disease.
The surveys showed that (1) the frequency of some health behaviours - those related to visible control methods - significantly increased with the subjective and objective prevalence of the disease, (2) perceived risk of infection for oneself tended to decrease considerably over time, and (3) the risk reappraisal hypothesis failed to account for this paradoxical trend in the people's response to the risk of contracting the disease.
These findings suggest that people may fail to adjust their risk perceptions, and to a lesser extent their health protective behaviours, to the course of an epidemic. Notably, the prevalence elasticity of preventive action found in previous studies of behavioural response to infectious diseases differed substantially according to the type of intervention (personal versus environmental methods). This paradoxical trend may be attributed to risk habituation effects, which seem to vary significantly according to the social visibility of thepreventive actions.
尽管最近人们更加关注健康行为的生态决定因素,但我们仍然不太了解传染病传播所引起的行为变化。
在本研究中,我们利用法属圭亚那大规模暴发基孔肯雅热(一种新出现的蚊媒疾病)的机会,研究了在疾病暴发时风险相关认知和行为之间发生的动态相互作用。具体而言,我们通过实证检验了以下假设,即风险认知和健康行为都对基孔肯雅热的流行具有弹性。
2015 年 1 月,即在疫情高峰期过后不久,对法属圭亚那的一个代表性样本(N=434)进行了访谈,并在 2 个月后再次进行了访谈。受访者被问及他们对威胁的看法,以及他们参与了一系列由地区卫生当局为控制疾病传播而推广的保护行为。
调查显示,(1)一些健康行为(与可见控制方法有关)的频率随着疾病的主观和客观流行而显著增加,(2)对自身感染风险的感知随着时间的推移而大大降低,(3)风险再评估假说无法解释人们对感染疾病风险的这种矛盾趋势。
这些发现表明,人们可能无法根据疫情的发展调整其风险认知,在较小程度上也无法调整其健康保护行为。值得注意的是,之前对传染病流行期间行为反应的研究中发现的预防行动的流行弹性,根据干预措施的类型(个人方法与环境方法)而有很大差异。这种矛盾的趋势可能归因于风险习惯化效应,而这些效应似乎因预防措施的社会可见性而异。