Suppr超能文献

基于证据的保护政策的主要障碍及可能的解决方案。

The major barriers to evidence-informed conservation policy and possible solutions.

作者信息

Rose David C, Sutherland William J, Amano Tatsuya, González-Varo Juan P, Robertson Rebecca J, Simmons Benno I, Wauchope Hannah S, Kovacs Eszter, Durán América Paz, Vadrot Alice B M, Wu Weiling, Dias Maria P, Di Fonzo Martina M I, Ivory Sarah, Norris Lucia, Nunes Matheus Henrique, Nyumba Tobias Ochieng, Steiner Noa, Vickery Juliet, Mukherjee Nibedita

机构信息

Department of Geography University of Cambridge Downing Place Cambridge CB2 3EN United Kingdom.

School of Environmental Sciences University of East Anglia Norwich Research Park Norwich NR4 7TJ United Kingdom.

出版信息

Conserv Lett. 2018 Sep-Oct;11(5):e12564. doi: 10.1111/conl.12564. Epub 2018 May 8.

Abstract

Conservation policy decisions can suffer from a lack of evidence, hindering effective decision-making. In nature conservation, studies investigating why policy is often not evidence-informed have tended to focus on Western democracies, with relatively small samples. To understand global variation and challenges better, we established a global survey aimed at identifying top barriers and solutions to the use of conservation science in policy. This obtained the views of 758 people in policy, practice, and research positions from 68 countries across six languages. Here we show that, contrary to popular belief, there is agreement between groups about how to incorporate conservation science into policy, and there is thus room for optimism. Barriers related to the low priority of conservation were considered to be important, while mainstreaming conservation was proposed as a key solution. Therefore, priorities should focus on convincing the public of the importance of conservation as an issue, which will then influence policy-makers to adopt pro-environmental long-term policies.

摘要

保护政策的决策可能因缺乏证据而受到影响,从而阻碍有效决策。在自然保护领域,那些探究政策为何往往缺乏科学依据的研究倾向于聚焦西方民主国家,样本相对较小。为了更好地理解全球范围内的差异和挑战,我们开展了一项全球调查,旨在确定将保护科学应用于政策过程中的主要障碍和解决方案。这项调查收集了来自68个国家、涵盖政策制定、实际工作和研究岗位的758人的观点,涉及六种语言。我们在此表明,与普遍看法相反,不同群体之间在如何将保护科学纳入政策方面存在共识,因此仍有乐观的空间。与保护工作优先级较低相关的障碍被认为很重要,而将保护工作主流化被提议作为关键解决方案。因此,工作重点应放在让公众相信保护问题的重要性上,这进而会影响政策制定者采取有利于环境的长期政策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20c0/6473637/59aa1f7ee422/CONL-11-na-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验