Suppr超能文献

在临床抗精神病药物干预有效性试验(CATIE)精神分裂症研究中,将全因治疗停药时间作为主要结局指标。

Time to All-cause Treatment Discontinuation as the Primary Outcome in the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) Schizophrenia Study.

作者信息

Davis Sonia M, Stroup T Scott, Koch Gary G, Davis Clarence E, Rosenheck Robert A, Lieberman Jeffrey A

机构信息

Quintiles, Inc.

Columbia University Department of Psychiatry.

出版信息

Stat Biopharm Res. 2011;3(2):253-265. doi: 10.1198/sbr.2011.10013. Epub 2012 Jan 1.

Abstract

Time until all-cause treatment discontinuation was the primary outcome of the CATIE trial. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this outcome, and evaluate its association with clinical correlates through graphical response profiles. We investigate the characteristics of patients who discontinued for patient decision, including a reclassification of patient decision into other reasons. All-cause discontinuation is compared to a related outcome, time until treatment failure. Patients who discontinued had lower quality of life scores than other patients. Patients discontinuing for lack of efficacy had worsened efficacy scores compared with an improvement for other patients. Those who discontinued for patient decision had lower compliance. Blinded reclassification of discontinuation for patient decision identified 5% of cases as lack of efficacy and 21% as intolerable side effects. Reclassified patients participated in the next study phase at a higher rate than those remaining as patient decision (67% vs. 10%). Treatment group differences for time to discontinuation due to patient decision were attenuated after censoring the reclassified patients, but were still suggestive. Treatment comparisons for time to treatment failure were consistent with all cause discontinuation, although somewhat smaller. All-cause discontinuation is recommended as a simple and comprehensive outcome for pharmaceutical Phase II-IV clinical trials.

摘要

全因治疗中断时间是CATIE试验的主要结局。我们讨论了这一结局的优缺点,并通过图形化反应曲线评估其与临床相关因素的关联。我们调查了因患者决定而中断治疗的患者特征,包括将患者决定重新分类为其他原因。将全因中断与一个相关结局——治疗失败时间进行比较。中断治疗的患者生活质量得分低于其他患者。因疗效不佳而中断治疗的患者,其疗效得分恶化,而其他患者则有所改善。因患者决定而中断治疗的患者依从性较低。对因患者决定而中断治疗进行盲法重新分类后发现,5%的病例为疗效不佳,21%为无法耐受的副作用。重新分类的患者进入下一研究阶段的比例高于仍归类为患者决定的患者(67%对10%)。在剔除重新分类的患者后,因患者决定导致的治疗中断时间的治疗组差异有所减弱,但仍具有提示性。治疗失败时间的治疗比较与全因中断一致,尽管幅度略小。全因中断被推荐作为药物II-IV期临床试验的一个简单而全面的结局。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.

本文引用的文献

3
Clinical trials design lessons from the CATIE study.来自CATIE研究的临床试验设计经验教训。
Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;166(11):1222-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08121809. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
5
Regression modeling of semicompeting risks data.半竞争风险数据的回归建模
Biometrics. 2007 Mar;63(1):96-108. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00621.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验