Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Institute of Advanced Biomedical Technologies (ITAB), G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Department of Human Sciences, Università Europea di Roma, Rome, Italy.
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 29;14(4):e0216164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216164. eCollection 2019.
Empathy is a key notion in the study of sociality. A phenomenological perspective on empathy as intersubjective understanding offers a common ground for multiple dimensions. Corresponding to the dichotomy between perceptual and cognitive levels, two constructs can be distinguished: vicariously experiencing and intuitively understanding others' emotions. We developed and validated a new questionnaire for the assessment of individual differences in empathy. In a first study (N = 921), we created a questionnaire measuring empathy consisting of a pool of 75 items. Exploratory factor analysis suggested to retain two factors ("Intuitive Understanding" and "Vicarious Experience"), whereas a 30-item version of the questionnaire had satisfactory psychometric properties. In a second study (N = 504), we administered the 30-items questionnaire and several concurrent/divergent measures. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that a two-factor structure best represented its latent factor structure. The results show that our questionnaire could be considered a reliable and valid measure of empathy with internal consistencies of 0.93 and 0.95 for Vicarious Experience and Intuitive Intuitive Understanding, respectively. Whereas our questionnaire mostly showed the expected convergence with existing scales of empathy, the correlations also suggest that it adds valuable new information to the assessment of empathy. The two-factor structure suggests that the perceptual (vicarious) experience and the basic (non-effortful) cognitive awareness of others' emotions can be assessed as distinct constructs. This bidimensional structure that distinguishes between the perceptual experience and the basic cognitive awareness of others' emotional states connects theoretical, empirical, and clinical data from psychology and neuroscience.
同理心是社会性研究中的一个关键概念。从主体间理解的现象学角度来看待同理心,可以为多个维度提供一个共同基础。对应于知觉和认知水平之间的二分法,可以区分出两种结构:替代性体验和直觉理解他人的情绪。我们开发并验证了一种新的用于评估同理心个体差异的问卷。在第一项研究(N=921)中,我们创建了一个包含 75 个项目的同理心问卷。探索性因素分析表明保留两个因素(“直觉理解”和“替代性体验”),而问卷的 30 项版本具有令人满意的心理测量学特性。在第二项研究(N=504)中,我们施测了 30 项问卷和几个同时性/发散性的测量。验证性因素分析表明,两因素结构最能代表其潜在的结构。结果表明,我们的问卷可以被认为是一种可靠和有效的同理心测量工具,其替代性体验和直觉理解的内部一致性分别为 0.93 和 0.95。虽然我们的问卷与现有的同理心量表大多表现出预期的一致性,但相关性也表明它为同理心的评估提供了有价值的新信息。两因素结构表明,他人情绪的知觉(替代性)体验和基本(非努力)认知意识可以被评估为不同的结构。这种区分他人情绪的知觉体验和基本认知意识的二维结构连接了来自心理学和神经科学的理论、实证和临床数据。