Suppr超能文献

二维共情测量:共情体验量表。

A bidimensional measure of empathy: Empathic Experience Scale.

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Institute of Advanced Biomedical Technologies (ITAB), G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.

Department of Human Sciences, Università Europea di Roma, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Apr 29;14(4):e0216164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216164. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Empathy is a key notion in the study of sociality. A phenomenological perspective on empathy as intersubjective understanding offers a common ground for multiple dimensions. Corresponding to the dichotomy between perceptual and cognitive levels, two constructs can be distinguished: vicariously experiencing and intuitively understanding others' emotions. We developed and validated a new questionnaire for the assessment of individual differences in empathy. In a first study (N = 921), we created a questionnaire measuring empathy consisting of a pool of 75 items. Exploratory factor analysis suggested to retain two factors ("Intuitive Understanding" and "Vicarious Experience"), whereas a 30-item version of the questionnaire had satisfactory psychometric properties. In a second study (N = 504), we administered the 30-items questionnaire and several concurrent/divergent measures. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that a two-factor structure best represented its latent factor structure. The results show that our questionnaire could be considered a reliable and valid measure of empathy with internal consistencies of 0.93 and 0.95 for Vicarious Experience and Intuitive Intuitive Understanding, respectively. Whereas our questionnaire mostly showed the expected convergence with existing scales of empathy, the correlations also suggest that it adds valuable new information to the assessment of empathy. The two-factor structure suggests that the perceptual (vicarious) experience and the basic (non-effortful) cognitive awareness of others' emotions can be assessed as distinct constructs. This bidimensional structure that distinguishes between the perceptual experience and the basic cognitive awareness of others' emotional states connects theoretical, empirical, and clinical data from psychology and neuroscience.

摘要

同理心是社会性研究中的一个关键概念。从主体间理解的现象学角度来看待同理心,可以为多个维度提供一个共同基础。对应于知觉和认知水平之间的二分法,可以区分出两种结构:替代性体验和直觉理解他人的情绪。我们开发并验证了一种新的用于评估同理心个体差异的问卷。在第一项研究(N=921)中,我们创建了一个包含 75 个项目的同理心问卷。探索性因素分析表明保留两个因素(“直觉理解”和“替代性体验”),而问卷的 30 项版本具有令人满意的心理测量学特性。在第二项研究(N=504)中,我们施测了 30 项问卷和几个同时性/发散性的测量。验证性因素分析表明,两因素结构最能代表其潜在的结构。结果表明,我们的问卷可以被认为是一种可靠和有效的同理心测量工具,其替代性体验和直觉理解的内部一致性分别为 0.93 和 0.95。虽然我们的问卷与现有的同理心量表大多表现出预期的一致性,但相关性也表明它为同理心的评估提供了有价值的新信息。两因素结构表明,他人情绪的知觉(替代性)体验和基本(非努力)认知意识可以被评估为不同的结构。这种区分他人情绪的知觉体验和基本认知意识的二维结构连接了来自心理学和神经科学的理论、实证和临床数据。

相似文献

1
A bidimensional measure of empathy: Empathic Experience Scale.
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 29;14(4):e0216164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216164. eCollection 2019.
2
Affective, sensory and empathic sharing of another's pain: The Empathy for Pain Scale.
Eur J Pain. 2015 Jul;19(6):807-16. doi: 10.1002/ejp.607. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
3
Psychometric properties of the questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy in a Portuguese sample.
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 1;13(6):e0197755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197755. eCollection 2018.
6
Psychometric properties of the Greek version of the Toronto Composite Empathy Scale in Greek dental students.
Eur J Dent Educ. 2013 Nov;17(4):208-17. doi: 10.1111/eje.12037. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
7
The Perth Empathy Scale: Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version and Its Mental Health Correlates.
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023 Nov 10;13(11):2615-2629. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13110182.
8
The Psychometric Assessment of Empathy: Development and Validation of the Perth Empathy Scale.
Assessment. 2023 Jun;30(4):1140-1156. doi: 10.1177/10731911221086987. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
10
The development and psychometric validation of a Chinese empathy motivation scale.
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Jul;28(13-14):2599-2612. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14846. Epub 2019 Apr 2.

本文引用的文献

2
Beholders' sensorimotor engagement enhances aesthetic rating of pictorial facial expressions of pain.
Psychol Res. 2020 Mar;84(2):370-379. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1067-7. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
3
Does Emotional Intelligence Fluctuate within Clinical Depressive Condition?
Psychiatry Investig. 2017 Sep;14(5):532-538. doi: 10.4306/pi.2017.14.5.532. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
4
Are we really measuring empathy? Proposal for a new measurement framework.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Dec;83:132-139. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
5
The Structure of Social Cognition: In(ter)dependence of Sociocognitive Processes.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2017 Jan 3;68:243-267. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044046. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
6
The Association among Difficulties in Emotion Regulation, Hostility, and Empathy in a Sample of Young Italian Adults.
Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 18;7:1068. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01068. eCollection 2016.
7
Not knowing what I feel: Emotional empathy in autism spectrum disorders.
Autism. 2017 May;21(4):450-457. doi: 10.1177/1362361316648520. Epub 2016 May 30.
8
Understanding criminal behavior: Empathic impairment in criminal offenders.
Soc Neurosci. 2017 Aug;12(4):379-385. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1179670. Epub 2016 May 9.
9
Models, Mechanisms and Moderators Dissociating Empathy and Theory of Mind.
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2017;30:193-206. doi: 10.1007/7854_2015_412.
10
Our empathic brain and suicidal individuals.
Crisis. 2015;36(4):227-30. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000327.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验