Di Plinio Simone, Greco Claudia, Arnò Simone, Innamorati Marco, Ebisch Sjoerd J H
Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Institute of Advanced Biomedical Technologies, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Dec 28;15(1):17. doi: 10.3390/bs15010017.
The Sense of Agency (SoA) refers to the subjective experience of controlling one's actions and the external events resulting from those actions. This study aimed to critically evaluate the construct validity, robustness, and clinical utility of the Sense of Agency Scale (SoAS) in an Italian-speaking population, using a data-driven approach to explore potential factor structures. A sample of 992 adults completed the SoAS alongside other validated psychological measures, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of the scale's psychometric properties. An iterative process of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA) was implemented to assess both two-factor and bifactor models. A refined 10-item version of the SoAS was established, comprising two distinct factors: Sense of Positive Agency (SoPA, five items) and Sense of Negative Agency (SoNA, five items). The results favored a two-factor solution supported by satisfying fit indices, factor loadings, and stability. The revised scale demonstrated strong internal consistency, with McDonald's omega values of 0.79 (SoNA) and 0.87 (SoPA). This study extends the literature by providing evidence of the scale's convergent and divergent validity, with significant correlations in the expected directions with constructs such as sense of self, hopelessness, impulsiveness, psychosis-like experiences, and schizotypal traits. These findings support the revised SoAS as a reliable and valid measure for assessing the Sense of Agency and highlight its broader applicability in understanding psychological and psychopathological constructs.
能动性意识(SoA)是指对自身行为以及这些行为所导致的外部事件进行控制的主观体验。本研究旨在运用数据驱动的方法探索潜在的因素结构,从而批判性地评估能动性意识量表(SoAS)在意大利语人群中的结构效度、稳健性和临床效用。992名成年人的样本完成了SoAS量表以及其他经过验证的心理测量,从而能够对该量表的心理测量特性进行全面分析。实施了探索性和验证性因素分析(EFA和CFA)的迭代过程,以评估双因素模型和双因素模型。建立了一个经过改进的10项版本的SoAS量表,包括两个不同的因素:积极能动性意识(SoPA,5项)和消极能动性意识(SoNA,5项)。结果支持一个双因素解决方案,该方案具有令人满意的拟合指数、因素负荷和稳定性。修订后的量表显示出很强的内部一致性,麦当劳欧米伽值分别为0.79(SoNA)和0.87(SoPA)。本研究通过提供该量表的收敛效度和区分效度的证据,扩展了相关文献,该量表与诸如自我意识、绝望感、冲动性、类精神病体验和分裂型特质等构念在预期方向上存在显著相关性。这些发现支持修订后的SoAS作为评估能动性意识的可靠有效测量工具,并突出了其在理解心理和精神病理学构念方面的更广泛适用性。