• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用谷歌可穿戴设备远程管理腹腔镜手术基础技能测试(FLS)的可行性。

Feasibility of remote administration of the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) skills test using Google wearable device.

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Division of General Surgery, University Health Network (UHN), Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):443-449. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06788-w. Epub 2019 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-019-06788-w
PMID:31037339
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) program is a simulation-based training program designed to teach and assess the basic skills necessary for laparoscopic surgery. Preliminary work has demonstrated the feasibility of using Skype™ as a telesimulation modality in reliably scoring the exam for remote centers. Google Glass (GG) (Mountain View, California) is referred to as a wearable computer containing a heads-up display and front-facing camera allowing point-of-view video transmission. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of GG in scoring the technical skills component of the FLS exam.

METHODS

Twenty-eight participants were asked to complete the peg transfer and intracorporeal knot tasks of FLS using both GG and Skype™ setups. GG employed a third-party HIPAA-compliant video software (Pristine; Austin, TX) for video transmission. Participants were alternated between setups and evaluated by onsite and remote proctors. Times and errors were recorded by both proctors. Interrater reliability of their FLS scores was compared using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs). GG experience was evaluated based on participant survey responses using a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Interrater reliability for GG demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between onsite (OP) and remote (RP) proctors with ICCs of 0.985 (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.969-0.993) and 0.997 (95% CI 0.993-0.998), respectively, for peg and suture tasks. Skype™ demonstrated ICCs of 1.0 (95% CI 1.0-1.0). Average Likert scale responses found GG to be distracting (2.71), obstructive of the view (2.79), and a limitation to task execution (2.75). Overall, there was no statistical difference in scores between GG and Skype™ setups for either the peg (t = 1.446, p = 0.154) or suture task (t = - 0.710, p = 0.480), only 1 participant found the use of GG superior to Skype™.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that although GG are feasible in remote assessment of FLS with strong interrater reliability (ICC > 0.95), Skype™ was the preferred modality.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜手术基础(FLS)课程是一个基于模拟的培训项目,旨在教授和评估腹腔镜手术所需的基本技能。初步研究已经证明,使用 Skype™作为远程中心考试的远程模拟模式是可行的。Google Glass(GG)(加利福尼亚州山景城)被称为一种可穿戴计算机,包含抬头显示器和前置摄像头,允许传输视角视频。本研究的目的是评估 GG 在评分 FLS 考试技术技能部分的可行性。

方法

要求 28 名参与者使用 GG 和 Skype™设置完成 peg 转移和腔内打结任务。GG 使用第三方符合 HIPAA 标准的视频软件(Austin,TX 的 Pristine)进行视频传输。参与者在设置之间交替,并由现场和远程监考人员进行评估。两位监考人员记录时间和错误。使用组内相关系数(ICC)比较他们 FLS 评分的评分者间可靠性。根据参与者的 5 分李克特量表调查回复评估 GG 经验。

结果

GG 的评分者间可靠性显示,现场(OP)和远程(RP)监考人员之间具有统计学显著相关性,peg 和缝线任务的 ICC 分别为 0.985(95%置信区间 [CI],0.969-0.993)和 0.997(95% CI 0.993-0.998)。Skype™的 ICC 为 1.0(95% CI 1.0-1.0)。平均李克特量表回复发现 GG 分散注意力(2.71)、妨碍视野(2.79)、限制任务执行(2.75)。总体而言,对于 peg(t=1.446,p=0.154)或缝线任务(t=-0.710,p=0.480),GG 和 Skype™设置之间的评分没有统计学差异,只有 1 名参与者认为 GG 优于 Skype™。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,尽管 GG 在 FLS 的远程评估中具有很强的评分者间可靠性(ICC>0.95)是可行的,但 Skype™是首选模式。

相似文献

1
Feasibility of remote administration of the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) skills test using Google wearable device.使用谷歌可穿戴设备远程管理腹腔镜手术基础技能测试(FLS)的可行性。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):443-449. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06788-w. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
2
Feasibility of remote administration of the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) skills test.腹腔镜手术基础(FLS)技能测试远程管理的可行性。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):4033-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3048-7. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
3
Ongoing evaluation of video-based assessment of proctors' scoring of the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery manual skills examination.基于视频的监考人员对腹腔镜手术基本技能操作考试评分的持续评估。
J Surg Educ. 2015 May-Jun;72(3):471-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.10.017.
4
Virtual fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) boot-camp using telesimulation: an educational solution during the COVID-19 pandemic.使用远程模拟技术的腹腔镜手术(FLS)虚拟基础训练营:COVID-19 大流行期间的教育解决方案。
Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):3926-3933. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09995-8. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
5
Remote FLS testing in the real world: ready for "prime time".现实世界中的远程荧光寿命光谱测试:准备好进入“黄金时段”。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):2697-702. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4595-x. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
6
Robotic skills can be aided by laparoscopic training.机器人技能可以通过腹腔镜培训得到辅助。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jun;32(6):2683-2688. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5963-5. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
7
Validity evidence for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program as an assessment tool: a systematic review.腹腔镜手术基础(FLS)项目作为一种评估工具的效度证据:一项系统综述。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):512-520. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4233-7. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
8
Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) manual skills assessment: surgeon vs nonsurgeon raters.腹腔镜手术基础(FLS)手动技能评估:外科医生与非外科医生评估者。
J Surg Educ. 2012 Sep-Oct;69(5):588-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
9
Telesimulation: an effective method for teaching the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery in resource-restricted countries.远程模拟:资源有限国家中教授腹腔镜手术基础的有效方法。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Feb;24(2):417-22. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0572-6. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
10
Cost Comparison of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Training Completed With Standard Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Equipment versus Low-Cost Equipment.使用标准腹腔镜手术设备与低成本设备完成腹腔镜手术基础培训的成本比较。
J Surg Educ. 2017 May-Jun;74(3):459-465. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.11.013. Epub 2016 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Mixed Reality Platforms in Telehealth Delivery: Scoping Review.远程医疗服务中的混合现实平台:范围综述
JMIR Biomed Eng. 2023 Mar 24;8:e42709. doi: 10.2196/42709.
2
An analysis of the effectiveness of reflective learning through watching videos recorded with smart glasses-With multiple views (student, patient, and overall) in radiography education.运用智能眼镜录制的具有多重视角(学生、患者和全面视角)的视频进行放射学教育中反思性学习效果的分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 2;19(1):e0296417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296417. eCollection 2024.
3
Virtual fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) boot-camp using telesimulation: an educational solution during the COVID-19 pandemic.

本文引用的文献

1
Technical feasibility and safety of image-guided parieto-occipital ventricular catheter placement with the assistance of a wearable head-up display.在可穿戴式抬头显示器辅助下进行顶枕部脑室导管定位的技术可行性和安全性。
Int J Med Robot. 2017 Dec;13(4). doi: 10.1002/rcs.1836. Epub 2017 May 19.
2
Feasibility Study of Utilization of Action Camera, GoPro Hero 4, Google Glass, and Panasonic HX-A100 in Spine Surgery.运动相机GoPro Hero 4、谷歌眼镜和松下HX - A100在脊柱手术中应用的可行性研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Feb 15;42(4):275-280. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001719.
3
Augmented and virtual reality in surgery-the digital surgical environment: applications, limitations and legal pitfalls.
使用远程模拟技术的腹腔镜手术(FLS)虚拟基础训练营:COVID-19 大流行期间的教育解决方案。
Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):3926-3933. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09995-8. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
4
Use of Extended Reality in Medical Education: An Integrative Review.扩展现实技术在医学教育中的应用:一项综合综述。
Med Sci Educ. 2022 Dec 19;33(1):275-286. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01698-4. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Auditorium of the future: e learning platform.未来讲堂:电子学习平台。
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Mar;13(3):2038-2043. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.69.
手术中的增强现实与虚拟现实——数字手术环境:应用、局限性及法律陷阱
Ann Transl Med. 2016 Dec;4(23):454. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.12.23.
4
The Use of Smart Glasses for Surgical Video Streaming.智能眼镜在手术视频流传输中的应用。
Surg Innov. 2017 Apr;24(2):151-154. doi: 10.1177/1553350616685431. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
5
Evaluation of Google Glass Technical Limitations on Their Integration in Medical Systems.谷歌眼镜在医疗系统集成中的技术局限性评估。
Sensors (Basel). 2016 Dec 15;16(12):2142. doi: 10.3390/s16122142.
6
Feasibility and safety of augmented reality-assisted urological surgery using smartglass.使用智能眼镜进行增强现实辅助泌尿外科手术的可行性和安全性。
World J Urol. 2017 Jun;35(6):967-972. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1956-6. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
7
Accuracy of remote chest X-ray interpretation using Google Glass technology.使用谷歌眼镜技术进行远程胸部X光解读的准确性。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Sep 15;219:38-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.070. Epub 2016 May 25.
8
Surgical Vision: Google Glass and Surgery.手术视野:谷歌眼镜与手术
Surg Innov. 2016 Aug;23(4):422-6. doi: 10.1177/1553350616646477. Epub 2016 May 3.
9
Inheriting the Learner's View: A Google Glass-Based Wearable Computing Platform for Improving Surgical Trainee Performance.继承学习者视角:一个基于谷歌眼镜的可穿戴计算平台,用于提高外科实习医生的表现。
J Surg Educ. 2016 Jul-Aug;73(4):682-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
10
Patient monitoring with Google Glass: a pilot study of a novel monitoring technology.使用谷歌眼镜进行患者监测:一项新型监测技术的试点研究。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2016 May;26(5):539-46. doi: 10.1111/pan.12879. Epub 2016 Mar 19.