Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Center on Autobiographical Memory Research, School of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 11, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Psychol Res. 2020 Oct;84(7):1829-1845. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01189-z. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
Numerous studies on episodic future thinking have demonstrated that individuals perceive their future as more positive and idyllic than their past. It has been suggested that this positivity bias might serve a self-enhancement function. Yet, conflicting findings and lack of systematic studies on the generalizability of the phenomenon leave this interpretation uncertain. We provide the first systematic examination of the positivity bias across different domains and tasks of future thinking. First, we use the same tasks in two different domains of future thinking, representing an episodic (events) and a semantic dimension (self-images), respectively. Second, we use two different measures of positivity bias (i.e., frequency of positive versus negative instances and their distance from present). Third, we contrast each measure in each domain for events/self-images related to self versus an acquaintance. Experiments 1 and 2 showed a strong, general tendency for the generation of positive future events/self-images, but most pronounced for self, relative to an acquaintance. Experiments 3 and 4 demonstrated that positive future events/self-images were dated closer to present, whereas negative ones were pushed further into the future, but only for self and not for an acquaintance. Our results support the idea that the positivity bias in future thinking serves a self-enhancement function and that this bias likely represents a similar underlying motivational mechanism across different domains of future thinking, whether episodic or semantic. The findings add to our understanding of the motivational functions served by different forms of future thoughts in relation to the self.
大量关于情景性未来思维的研究表明,人们认为未来比过去更加积极和理想化。有人认为这种积极偏见可能具有自我增强的功能。然而,由于对这一现象的普遍性的研究结果相互矛盾,缺乏系统的研究,因此这种解释并不确定。我们首次对未来思维的不同领域和任务中的积极偏见进行了系统的考察。首先,我们在未来思维的两个不同领域中使用了相同的任务,分别代表情景性(事件)和语义性维度(自我意象)。其次,我们使用了两种不同的积极偏见测量方法(即积极与消极实例的频率及其与现在的距离)。第三,我们在自我和熟人的自我/熟人相关的事件/自我意象的两个领域中,对每个测量方法进行了对比。实验 1 和 2 表明,相对于熟人,自我产生的积极未来事件/自我意象具有强烈而普遍的倾向。实验 3 和 4 表明,积极的未来事件/自我意象距离现在更近,而消极的未来事件/自我意象则更倾向于被推到未来,但仅针对自我,而不是熟人。我们的研究结果支持了这样一种观点,即未来思维中的积极偏见具有自我增强的功能,而且这种偏见可能代表了不同领域的未来思维(情景性或语义性)中类似的潜在动机机制。这些发现增加了我们对与自我相关的不同形式的未来思维所服务的动机功能的理解。