Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.
Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
J Int AIDS Soc. 2019 Apr;22(4):e25276. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25276.
Geographic and transportation barriers are associated with poorer HIV-related health outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa, but data on the impact of these barriers on prevention interventions are limited. We estimated the association between distance to clinic and other transportation-related barriers on pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake and initial clinic visit attendance in a rural community in southwestern Uganda enrolled in the ongoing SEARCH study (NCT01864603).
Community-wide HIV testing was conducted and offered to adult (≥15 years) participants in Ruhoko. Participants were eligible for PrEP based on an empiric risk score, having an HIV-discordant partner, or self-referral at either the community health campaign or during home-based testing from March to April 2017. We collected data from PrEP-eligible households on GPS-measured distance to clinic, walking time to clinic and road difficulty. A sample of participants was also asked to identify their primary barriers to PrEP use with a semi-quantitative questionnaire. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between transportation barriers and (1) PrEP uptake among PrEP-eligible individuals and (2) four-week clinic visit attendance among PrEP initiators.
Of the 701 PrEP-eligible participants, 272 (39%) started PrEP within four weeks; of these, 45 (17%) were retained at four weeks. Participants with a distance to clinic of ≥2 km were less likely to start PrEP (aOR 0.34; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.79, p = 0.012) and less likely to be retained on PrEP once initiated (aOR 0.29; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.84; p = 0.024). Participants who were deemed eligible during home-based testing and did not have the option of same-day PrEP start were also substantially less likely to initiate PrEP (aOR 0.16, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.37, p < 0.001). Of participants asked to name barriers to PrEP use (N = 98), the most frequently cited were "needing to take PrEP every day" (N = 18) and "low/no risk of getting HIV" (N = 18). Transportation-related barriers, including "clinic is too far away" (N = 6) and "travel away from home" (N = 4) were also reported.
Distance to clinic is a significant predictor of PrEP uptake and four-week follow-up visit attendance in a community in rural Uganda. Interventions that address geographic and transportation barriers may improve PrEP uptake and retention in sub-Saharan Africa.
在撒哈拉以南非洲,地理和交通障碍与较差的艾滋病毒相关健康结果有关,但有关这些障碍对预防干预措施影响的数据有限。我们评估了距离诊所的距离和其他交通相关障碍对在乌干达西南部农村社区参加正在进行的 SEARCH 研究(NCT01864603)的成年人(≥15 岁)参与者中暴露前预防(PrEP)的接受情况和首次就诊的影响。
对 Ruhoko 社区进行了社区范围的艾滋病毒检测,并向成年人提供了检测。根据经验风险评分、与艾滋病毒不一致的伴侣或社区卫生运动或家庭检测期间的自我推荐,有资格接受 PrEP 的参与者有资格接受 PrEP。2017 年 3 月至 4 月。我们从 PrEP 合格家庭收集了有关诊所距离、前往诊所的步行时间和道路难度的 GPS 测量数据。还要求一小部分参与者使用半定量问卷识别他们使用 PrEP 的主要障碍。我们使用多变量逻辑回归评估交通障碍与(1)PrEP 合格个体中 PrEP 的接受情况和(2)PrEP 启动者的四周就诊率之间的关联。
在 701 名 PrEP 合格的参与者中,有 272 名(39%)在四周内开始接受 PrEP;其中 45 名(17%)在四周时得到保留。距离诊所≥2 公里的参与者不太可能开始接受 PrEP(优势比 0.34;95%置信区间 0.15 至 0.79,p=0.012),并且一旦开始接受 PrEP,不太可能保留(优势比 0.29;95%置信区间 0.10 至 0.84;p=0.024)。在家中接受检测且没有当天开始 PrEP 选择的参与者也不太可能开始 PrEP(优势比 0.16,95%置信区间 0.07 至 0.37,p<0.001)。在被要求说出 PrEP 使用障碍的参与者中(N=98),最常提到的是“需要每天服用 PrEP”(N=18)和“感染 HIV 的风险低/无”(N=18)。还报告了与交通相关的障碍,包括“诊所太远”(N=6)和“离家旅行”(N=4)。
在乌干达农村的一个社区中,距离诊所的距离是 PrEP 接受情况和四周随访就诊率的重要预测因素。解决地理和交通障碍的干预措施可能会提高撒哈拉以南非洲 PrEP 的接受率和保留率。