Craemer Katherine A, Sampene Emmanuel, Safdar Nasia, Antony Kathleen M, Wautlet Cynthia K
Department of Integrated Biology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
AJP Rep. 2019 Jan;9(1):e92-e120. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683377. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
To evaluate nutrition-only, exercise-only, and nutrition-plus-exercise interventions for optimizing gestational weight gain (GWG) based on the 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines. PubMed, Google Scholar, and 2015 Cochrane Review were searched. Analysis of variance was used to determine if significant GWG differences exist between strategies, with additional subanalyses on overweight (OV) or obese women based on 2009 IOM guidelines. Of 66 identified studies, 31 contributed data ( = 8,558). Compared with routine prenatal care, nutrition-only interventions were significantly associated with reduced GWG and are most likely to produce weight gain within IOM recommendations ( = 0.013). Exercise-only ( = 0.069) and nutrition-plus-exercise ( = 0.056) interventions trended toward GWG within IOM guidelines, but did not reach statistical significance. Supervised ( = 0.61) and unsupervised ( = 0.494) exercise programs had similar effectiveness. Subanalyses on OV or obese women produced similar results to studies that did not differentiate results based on body mass index: nutrition only ( = 0.011), exercise only ( = 0.308), and nutrition plus exercise ( = 0.129). Preventing excessive GWG is crucial, especially for OV or obese women. In the current study, nutrition-based intervention is the health system strategy that showed significant impact on preventing excessive GWG compared with routine prenatal care. Among women who are OV or have obesity, nutrition-only interventions hold the most promise compared with routine prenatal care.
根据2009年医学研究所(IOM)指南,评估仅营养干预、仅运动干预以及营养加运动干预对优化孕期体重增加(GWG)的效果。检索了PubMed、谷歌学术和2015年Cochrane系统评价。采用方差分析确定不同策略之间GWG是否存在显著差异,并根据2009年IOM指南对超重或肥胖女性进行额外的亚组分析。在66项已识别的研究中,31项提供了数据(n = 8558)。与常规产前护理相比,仅营养干预与GWG降低显著相关,并且最有可能使体重增加符合IOM建议(P = 0.013)。仅运动干预(P = 0.069)和营养加运动干预(P = 0.056)的GWG有符合IOM指南的趋势,但未达到统计学显著性。有监督的运动计划(P = 0.61)和无监督的运动计划(P = 0.494)效果相似。对超重或肥胖女性的亚组分析结果与未根据体重指数区分结果的研究相似:仅营养干预(P = 0.011)、仅运动干预(P = 0.308)和营养加运动干预(P = 0.129)。预防GWG过度至关重要,尤其是对于超重或肥胖女性。在本研究中,与常规产前护理相比,基于营养的干预是对预防GWG过度显示出显著影响的卫生系统策略。在超重或肥胖女性中,与常规产前护理相比,仅营养干预最有前景。