• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

费用分担对门诊医疗中抗生素使用的影响:一项基于人群的随机对照试验的结果

The effect of cost sharing on the use of antibiotics in ambulatory care: results from a population-based randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Foxman B, Valdez R B, Lohr K N, Goldberg G A, Newhouse J P, Brook R H

出版信息

J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):429-37. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90176-7.

DOI:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90176-7
PMID:3104386
Abstract

Little is known about how generosity of insurance and population characteristics affect quantity or appropriateness of antibiotic use. Using insurance claims for antibiotics from 5765 non-elderly people who lived in six sites in the United States and were randomly assigned to insurance plans varying by level of cost-sharing, we describe how antibiotic use varies by insurance plan, diagnosis and health status, geographic area, and demographic characteristics. People with free medical care used 85% more antibiotics than those required to pay some portion of their medical bills (controlling for all other variables). Antibiotic use was significantly more common among women, the very young, patients with poorer health, and persons with higher income. Use of antibiotics for viral, viral-bacterial, and bacterial conditions did not differ between free and cost-sharing insurance plans, given antibiotics were the treatment of choice. Cost sharing reduced inappropriate and appropriate antibiotic use to a similar degree.

摘要

关于保险的慷慨程度和人口特征如何影响抗生素使用的数量或合理性,我们所知甚少。利用来自美国六个地点的5765名非老年人的抗生素保险理赔数据,这些人被随机分配到不同费用分摊水平的保险计划中,我们描述了抗生素的使用如何因保险计划、诊断和健康状况、地理区域以及人口特征而有所不同。享受免费医疗的人群使用的抗生素比那些需要支付部分医疗费用的人群多85%(控制所有其他变量)。抗生素的使用在女性、幼儿、健康状况较差的患者以及收入较高的人群中明显更为普遍。对于病毒、病毒 - 细菌和细菌感染情况,无论保险计划是免费还是需要分摊费用,只要抗生素是首选治疗方法,其使用情况并无差异。费用分摊在相似程度上减少了不适当和适当的抗生素使用。

相似文献

1
The effect of cost sharing on the use of antibiotics in ambulatory care: results from a population-based randomized controlled trial.费用分担对门诊医疗中抗生素使用的影响:一项基于人群的随机对照试验的结果
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):429-37. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90176-7.
2
The impact of cost sharing on emergency department use.费用分担对急诊科使用的影响。
N Engl J Med. 1985 Aug 22;313(8):484-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198508223130806.
3
Some interim results from a controlled trial of cost sharing in health insurance.一项医疗保险费用分担对照试验的一些中期结果。
N Engl J Med. 1981 Dec 17;305(25):1501-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198112173052504.
4
The demand for prescription drugs as a function of cost-sharing.作为成本分摊函数的处方药需求。
Soc Sci Med. 1985;21(10):1063-9. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90161-3.
5
Inappropriate use of hospitals in a randomized trial of health insurance plans.医疗保险计划随机试验中医院的不当使用情况。
N Engl J Med. 1986 Nov 13;315(20):1259-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198611133152005.
6
Use of medical care in the Rand Health Insurance Experiment. Diagnosis- and service-specific analyses in a randomized controlled trial.兰德健康保险实验中的医疗服务使用情况。一项随机对照试验中的诊断及特定服务分析。
Med Care. 1986 Sep;24(9 Suppl):S1-87.
7
Effects of cost sharing on physiological health, health practices, and worry.费用分担对生理健康、健康行为及焦虑情绪的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1987 Aug;22(3):279-306.
8
How cost sharing affects the use of ambulatory mental health services.费用分摊如何影响门诊心理健康服务的使用。
JAMA. 1986 Oct 10;256(14):1930-4.
9
Does free care improve adults' health? Results from a randomized controlled trial.免费医疗能改善成年人的健康状况吗?一项随机对照试验的结果。
N Engl J Med. 1983 Dec 8;309(23):1426-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198312083092305.
10
The demand for episodes of treatment in the Health Insurance Experiment.健康保险实验中治疗阶段的需求。
J Health Econ. 1988 Dec;7(4):337-67. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(88)90020-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Reduced user fees for antibiotics under age 5 in Hungary: Effect on antibiotic use and imbalances in the implementation.匈牙利降低 5 岁以下儿童抗生素费用:对抗生素使用和实施不平衡的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 28;14(6):e0219085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219085. eCollection 2019.
2
Ambulatory Antibiotic Stewardship through a Human Factors Engineering Approach: A Systematic Review.通过人因工程学方法实现门诊抗生素管理:一项系统综述
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 May-Jun;31(3):417-430. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170225.
3
A retrospective audit of antibiotic prescriptions in primary health-care facilities in Eastern Region, Ghana.
加纳东部地区初级卫生保健机构抗生素处方的回顾性审计。
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Mar;31(2):250-8. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv048. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
4
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of cap and co-payment on rational use of medicines.药品政策:封顶价和共付额对合理用药的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 8;2015(5):CD007017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007017.pub2.
5
How patient cost-sharing trends affect adherence and outcomes: a literature review.患者费用分担趋势如何影响依从性和治疗结果:一项文献综述。
P T. 2012 Jan;37(1):45-55.
6
Ambulatory antibiotic use and prescription drug coverage in older adults.老年人门诊抗生素使用及处方药覆盖情况
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Aug 9;170(15):1308-14. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.235.
7
What impact do prescription drug charges have on efficiency and equity? Evidence from high-income countries.处方药费用对效率和公平有何影响?来自高收入国家的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2008 May 2;7:12. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-7-12.
8
Prescription drug cost sharing: associations with medication and medical utilization and spending and health.处方药费用分担:与药物使用、医疗利用、支出及健康的关联
JAMA. 2007 Jul 4;298(1):61-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.1.61.
9
Charging the patient to save the system? Like bailing water with a sieve.向患者收费以拯救医疗系统?这就像用筛子舀水一样。
CMAJ. 2004 Jun 8;170(12):1812-3. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1040699.
10
The effect of managed care on prescription drug costs and benefits.管理式医疗对处方药成本和效益的影响。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Feb;15(2):129-40. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199915020-00002.