St-Amour Lorie, Jarry Jonathan, Wittich Walter
School of Optometry, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
CRIR/Centre de réadaptation MAB-Mackay du CIUSSS du Centre-Ouest-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Optom Vis Sci. 2019 May;96(5):345-353. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001374.
The successful uptake, integration, and use of vision rehabilitation devices with speech output depend to a large part on their audibility. However, individuals with combined vision and hearing impairments are at a disadvantage when using devices that do not consider multiple impairments.
Sensory rehabilitation for individuals with combined vision and hearing impairment often relies on the use of assistive technology devices that use speech outputs (e.g., talking clock), but in individuals with dual impairment, their use is likely compromised by a concurrent hearing loss. The goal of this study was to evaluate the audibility of these devices in a population of individuals with acquired dual sensory impairment.
We measured the ability to correctly repeat speech output presented by three assistive technology devices (talking watch, calculator, scanner) and confidence levels in response accuracy in 24 participants with visual impairment only and in 22 individuals with dual sensory loss. Stimuli were presented at three volumes that were repeated one or four times. Participants were placed at a fixed distance of 74 cm from the sound source.
The pattern of results was similar across the different devices, whereby an interaction of volume and repetition indicated that participants' accuracy to repeat a phrase and their confidence in their response improved with increasing volume, but more so at higher numbers of repetition (P < .05; ω, from 0.005 to 0.298). Participants with dual sensory loss generally had lower accuracy and confidence.
Scores and confidence levels being very low across devices and users suggest that even participants with normal hearing for their age experienced a certain level of difficulty understanding speech output, confirming the need for better assistive technology device design.
视觉康复设备与语音输出的成功采用、整合和使用在很大程度上取决于其可听度。然而,患有视力和听力双重障碍的个体在使用未考虑多种障碍的设备时处于劣势。
针对患有视力和听力双重障碍的个体进行的感官康复通常依赖于使用具有语音输出功能的辅助技术设备(如语音时钟),但对于患有双重障碍的个体,其使用可能会因同时存在的听力损失而受到影响。本研究的目的是评估这些设备在获得性双重感官障碍人群中的可听度。
我们测量了24名仅患有视力障碍的参与者和22名患有双重感官损失的个体正确重复三种辅助技术设备(语音手表、计算器、扫描仪)呈现的语音输出的能力以及对回答准确性的信心水平。刺激以三种音量呈现,每种音量重复一次或四次。参与者被放置在距离声源74厘米的固定距离处。
不同设备的结果模式相似,音量和重复次数的交互作用表明,参与者重复短语的准确性及其对回答的信心随着音量的增加而提高,但在重复次数较多时提高得更多(P <.05;ω,从0.005到0.298)。患有双重感官损失的参与者的准确性和信心通常较低。
不同设备和用户的得分及信心水平都很低,这表明即使是听力正常的同龄人在理解语音输出时也经历了一定程度的困难,这证实了需要更好地设计辅助技术设备。