• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏再同步治疗患者的长期生存和晚期迟发性心源性猝死。

Very long-term survival and late sudden cardiac death in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients.

机构信息

Cardiology Department, Hospital da Luz Arrabida, V. N. Gaia, Portugal.

Cardiology Department, V. N. Gaia Hospital Center, V. N. Gaia, Portugal.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2019 Jul 1;40(26):2121-2127. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz238.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz238
PMID:31046090
Abstract

AIMS

The very long-term outcome of patients who survive the first few years after receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has not been well described thus far. We aimed to provide long-term outcomes, especially with regard to the occurrence of sudden cardiac death (SCD), in CRT patients without (CRT-P) and with defibrillator (CRT-D).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 1775 patients, with ischaemic or non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy, who were alive 5 years after CRT implantation, were enrolled in this multicentre European observational cohort study. Overall long-term mortality rates and specific causes of death were assessed, with a focus on late SCD. Over a mean follow-up of 30 months (interquartile range 10-42 months) beyond the first 5 years, we observed 473 deaths. The annual age-standardized mortality rates of CRT-D and CRT-P patients were 40.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 35.3-45.5] and 97.2 (95% CI 85.5-109.9) per 1000 patient-years, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality was 0.99 (95% CI 0.79-1.22). Twenty-nine patients in total died of late SCD (14 with CRT-P, 15 with CRT-D), corresponding to 6.1% of all causes of death in both device groups. Specific annual SCD rates were 8.5 and 5.8 per 1000 patient-years in CRT-P and CRT-D patients, respectively, with no significant difference between groups (adjusted HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.45-2.44). Death due to progressive heart failure represented the principal cause of death (42.8% in CRT-P patients and 52.6% among CRT-D recipients), whereas approximately one-third of deaths in both device groups were due to non-cardiovascular death.

CONCLUSION

In this first description of very long-term outcomes among CRT recipients, progressive heart failure death still represented the most frequent cause of death in patients surviving the first 5 years after CRT implant. In contrast, SCD represents a very low proportion of late mortality irrespective of the presence of a defibrillator.

摘要

目的

心脏再同步治疗(CRT)后存活最初数年的患者的长期预后尚未得到很好的描述。我们旨在提供长期结果,特别是关于 CRT 患者(无 CRT-P 和有除颤器 CRT-D)中发生心源性猝死(SCD)的情况。

方法和结果

本项多中心欧洲观察性队列研究共纳入了 1775 名存活超过 CRT 植入后 5 年的缺血性或非缺血性扩张型心肌病患者。评估了总体长期死亡率和特定死因,重点关注晚期 SCD。在超过最初 5 年的平均 30 个月(10-42 个月的四分位间距)随访中,我们观察到 473 例死亡。CRT-D 和 CRT-P 患者的年标准化死亡率分别为 40.4 [95%置信区间(CI)35.3-45.5]和 97.2(95% CI 85.5-109.9)/1000 患者年。全因死亡率的调整后危险比(HR)为 0.99(95% CI 0.79-1.22)。共有 29 例患者总死于晚期 SCD(CRT-P 组 14 例,CRT-D 组 15 例),占两组设备患者所有死因的 6.1%。CRT-P 和 CRT-D 患者的特定年度 SCD 发生率分别为 8.5 和 5.8/1000 患者年,两组之间无显著差异(调整后 HR 1.0,95% CI 0.45-2.44)。进展性心力衰竭导致的死亡是主要死亡原因(CRT-P 患者中为 42.8%,CRT-D 患者中为 52.6%),而两组中约三分之一的死亡归因于非心血管死亡。

结论

在 CRT 受者的首次长期预后描述中,进展性心力衰竭死亡仍然是 CRT 植入后最初 5 年内存活患者最常见的死亡原因。相比之下,无论是否存在除颤器,SCD 都是晚期死亡率的一个非常低的比例。

相似文献

1
Very long-term survival and late sudden cardiac death in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients.心脏再同步治疗患者的长期生存和晚期迟发性心源性猝死。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jul 1;40(26):2121-2127. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz238.
2
Cause-of-death analysis in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without a defibrillator: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis.心脏再同步治疗患者的死因分析:一项系统评价和比例荟萃分析。
Europace. 2018 Mar 1;20(3):481-491. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux094.
3
Risk factors and the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on cardiac and non-cardiac mortality in MADIT-CRT.MADIT-CRT 中的心脏再同步治疗的心脏和非心脏死亡率的风险因素及影响。
Europace. 2015 Dec;17(12):1816-22. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv201. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
4
Time trends in sudden cardiac death risk in heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review.心脏再同步治疗的心力衰竭患者心源性猝死风险的时间趋势:一项系统评价
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jun 1;41(21):1976-1986. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz773.
5
Patients upgraded to cardiac resynchronization therapy due to pacing-induced cardiomyopathy are at low risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias: a long-term cause-of-death analysis.由于起搏诱导性心肌病而升级为心脏再同步治疗的患者发生危及生命的室性心律失常的风险较低:一项长期死因分析。
Europace. 2018 Jan 1;20(1):89-96. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw321.
6
Applicability of a risk score for prediction of the long-term benefit of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.用于预测接受心脏再同步治疗的患者中植入式心脏复律除颤器的长期获益的风险评分的适用性。
Europace. 2016 Aug;18(8):1187-93. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv352. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
7
Sex Differences in Long-Term Outcomes With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Mild Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block.左束支传导阻滞的轻度心力衰竭患者接受心脏再同步治疗的长期预后的性别差异
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jun 29;4(7):e002013. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002013.
8
Causes-of-death analysis of patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy: an analysis of the CeRtiTuDe cohort study.心脏再同步治疗患者的死因分析:CeRtiTuDe队列研究分析
Eur Heart J. 2015 Nov 1;36(41):2767-76. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv455. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
9
Comparative Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Among Patients With Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation: Findings From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry's Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry.心力衰竭合并心房颤动患者心脏再同步治疗的比较效果:来自国家心血管数据注册中心植入式心律转复除颤器注册研究的结果
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Jun;9(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002324.
10
Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with implantable cardioverter defibrillator versus cardiac resynchronization therapy with pacemaker on mortality in heart failure patients: results of a high-volume, single-centre experience.植入式心脏复律除颤器心脏再同步治疗与起搏器心脏再同步治疗对心力衰竭患者死亡率的影响:一项高容量单中心经验的结果
Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Dec;16(12):1323-30. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.185. Epub 2014 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in numbers needed to treat and hospital care expenditures of optimized indications for primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a scenario analysis.一级预防植入式心脏复律除颤器优化适应证的治疗所需人数及住院护理费用的变化:一项情景分析。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Jun 10. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02687-4.
2
Antecedents of academic actual help-seeking behaviour and support services utilisation among distance education students.远程教育学生学术实际求助行为及支持服务利用的前因
Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 18;15:1453321. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1453321. eCollection 2024.
3
Time-trend treatment effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillator on mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
心脏再同步治疗伴或不伴除颤器对死亡率的时间趋势治疗效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Europace. 2023 Oct 5;25(10). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad289.
4
A long-term cost-effectiveness analysis of cardiac resynchronisation therapy with or without defibrillator based on health claims data.基于健康声明数据的心脏再同步治疗(无论是否配备除颤器)的长期成本效益分析
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022 Sep 2;20(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12962-022-00384-x.
5
Survival of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillator: the RESET-CRT project.接受心脏再同步治疗(有或无除颤器)患者的生存情况:RESET-CRT 项目。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Jul 14;43(27):2591-2599. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac053.
6
Mortality among ischemic and nonischemic heart failure patients with a primary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.植入式心律转复除颤器植入术后缺血性和非缺血性心力衰竭患者的死亡率
J Arrhythm. 2021 Oct 29;37(6):1537-1545. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12651. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
Shortening of time-to-peak left ventricular pressure rise (Td) in cardiac resynchronization therapy.左心室压力上升时间峰值缩短(Td)在心脏再同步治疗中的作用。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Dec;8(6):5222-5236. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13601. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
8
Trends in the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy device in advancing age: Analysis of the Japan cardiac device treatment registry database.高龄人群植入式心脏复律除颤器和心脏再同步治疗设备的使用趋势:日本心脏设备治疗登记数据库分析
J Arrhythm. 2020 Jun 8;36(4):737-745. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12377. eCollection 2020 Aug.
9
What Cannot Be Missed: Important Publications on Electrophysiology in 2019.不可错过:2019年电生理学重要出版物
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2020 Jun 3;9(1):4. doi: 10.15420/aer.2020.06.
10
Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy in Patients with Moderate to Severe Heart Failure in Germany: A Cost-Utility Analysis of the Additional Defibrillator.德国中重度心力衰竭患者的心脏再同步治疗:附加除颤器的成本效益分析
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Jan;19(1):57-68. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00571-y.