• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诊断X射线管辐射强度输出的非均匀分布研究

An Investigation on the Non-uniform Distribution of Radiation Intensity Output of Diagnostic X-ray Tubes.

作者信息

Chan Charles Tai Po, Fung Karl Ka Lok

机构信息

Department of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.

Department of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.

出版信息

J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2014 Sep;45(3):223-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2014.04.006. Epub 2014 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmir.2014.04.006
PMID:31051973
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed at investigating the air kerma distribution of the radiation output in two and three dimensions of three general radiographic units by physical measurements.

METHODS

A 6-cm ionization chamber was placed at 5-cm intervals of 225 locations in a 70 × 70 cm x-ray beam field. The chamber was placed at a level of 30 cm above the x-ray table to measure the air kerma intensity of the x-ray output across the whole area. Three different brands of radiographic units with different anode target angles and at different tube aging stages were studied. The same exposure parameters were used for each location, and measurements were made for three different tube potentials at 60, 85, and 110 kilovoltage peaks (kV[p]).

RESULTS

At the tube potential of 85 kV(p), the relative maximum percentage differences on the average air kerma measured along the central anode-cathode axis (x-axis) of the x-ray tube were found to be 31.5%, 15.5%, and 43.1% more at the cathode ends than those at the anode ends of the three radiographic units. Results of a paired samples t test (confidence intervals at 95%, two-tailed) on three of the four fixed pair-wise sampling points along the x-axis were found to be statistically significant in their relative percentage differences in air kerma intensity with respect to the central point (labeled as 35 cm) with a P value ≤.03. However, those measured at four fixed pair-wise points at 90° across the anode-cathode direction were all found to be statistically nonsignificant (P ≥ .29). Similar trends were observed for the other two tube potentials tested. From the three-dimensional displays of radiation output intensity, a similar unique pyramidal shape pattern with a skewed peak toward the cathode end was observed for all three diagnostic x-ray tubes tested.

CONCLUSIONS

The anode heel effect was found to be enhanced in the x-ray tube with a smaller anode target angle, more aging, and higher tube potentials. Three-dimensional air kerma distribution maps of the three x-ray units tested were found to be similar in pattern, and this was displayed in detail regarding the extent of the anode heel effect.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过物理测量来调查三种普通X射线摄影设备在二维和三维空间中辐射输出的空气比释动能分布情况。

方法

将一个6厘米的电离室放置在70×70厘米X射线束场中225个位置处,间隔5厘米。电离室放置在X射线检查台上方30厘米的高度,以测量整个区域内X射线输出的空气比释动能强度。研究了三种不同品牌、具有不同阳极靶角且处于不同管老化阶段的X射线摄影设备。每个位置使用相同的曝光参数,并在60、85和110千伏峰值(kV[p])的三种不同管电压下进行测量。

结果

在85 kV(p)的管电压下,发现沿X射线管中心阳极 - 阴极轴(x轴)测量的平均空气比释动能,在三种X射线摄影设备的阴极端比阳极端分别高出31.5%、15.5%和43.1%。在沿x轴的四个固定成对采样点中的三个点上进行的配对样本t检验(95%置信区间,双侧)结果显示,相对于中心点(标记为35厘米),其空气比释动能强度的相对百分比差异具有统计学意义,P值≤0.03。然而,在与阳极 - 阴极方向成90°的四个固定成对点处测量的结果均无统计学意义(P≥0.29)。在测试的其他两种管电压下也观察到了类似趋势。从辐射输出强度的三维显示中可以看出,对于所有测试的三种诊断X射线管,都观察到了类似的独特金字塔形状模式,其峰值向阴极端倾斜。

结论

发现阳极靶角较小、老化程度较高和管电压较高的X射线管中,阳极足跟效应增强。测试的三种X射线设备的三维空气比释动能分布图在模式上相似,并且详细显示了阳极足跟效应的程度。

相似文献

1
An Investigation on the Non-uniform Distribution of Radiation Intensity Output of Diagnostic X-ray Tubes.诊断X射线管辐射强度输出的非均匀分布研究
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2014 Sep;45(3):223-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2014.04.006. Epub 2014 Sep 13.
2
"Anode heel effect" on patient dose in lumbar spine radiography.腰椎摄影中“阳极足跟效应”对患者剂量的影响。
Br J Radiol. 2000 May;73(869):531-6. doi: 10.1259/bjr.73.869.10884750.
3
Proposing Intelligent Approach to Predicting Air Kerma within Radiation Beams of Medical X-ray Imaging Systems.提出预测医用X射线成像系统辐射束内空气比释动能的智能方法。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 4;13(2):190. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13020190.
4
An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.对两种数字射线照相系统的自动曝光控制方案的研究。
Phys Med Biol. 2009 Aug 7;54(15):4645-70. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/15/002. Epub 2009 Jul 10.
5
Review of Kerma-Area Product and total energy incident on patients in radiography, mammography and CT.射线照相、乳腺摄影和CT中比释动能面积乘积及患者所受入射总能量的综述。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015 Feb;163(2):251-60. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncu157. Epub 2014 May 12.
6
Geometrical model for calculating the effect of surface morphology on total x-ray output of medical x-ray tubes.用于计算表面形态对医用X射线管总X射线输出影响的几何模型。
Med Phys. 2021 Apr;48(4):1546-1556. doi: 10.1002/mp.14649. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
7
Air Kerma Calculation in Diagnostic Medical Imaging Devices Using Group Method of Data Handling Network.使用数据处理网络分组法的诊断医学成像设备中的空气比释动能计算
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 14;13(8):1418. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13081418.
8
Quantifying the effect of anode surface roughness on diagnostic x-ray spectra using Monte Carlo simulation.利用蒙特卡罗模拟定量研究阳极表面粗糙度对诊断 X 射线光谱的影响。
Med Phys. 2010 Feb;37(2):742-52. doi: 10.1118/1.3284212.
9
X-ray spectroscopy applied to radiation shielding calculation in mammography.用于乳腺摄影辐射屏蔽计算的X射线光谱学
Med Phys. 2008 Aug;35(8):3539-45. doi: 10.1118/1.2953566.
10
Improved air kerma determination in the radiation field of the X-ray tube used in medical imaging systems, considering the type and thickness of the filter.考虑到滤波器的类型和厚度,改进医疗成像系统中 X 射线管辐射场中的空气比释动能的测定。
Appl Radiat Isot. 2024 Dec;214:111481. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2024.111481. Epub 2024 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Dose Variations Using an X-Ray Cabinet to Establish Dose-Response Curves for Biological Dosimetry Assays.使用 X 射线机柜建立剂量反应曲线进行生物剂量测定的剂量变化。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 17;10:903509. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.903509. eCollection 2022.