• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2000-2014 年佛罗里达州心肌梗死死亡风险的地理差异和时间变化。

Geographic disparities and temporal changes in risk of death from myocardial infarction in Florida, 2000-2014.

机构信息

Comparative and Experimental Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Tennessee, 2407 River Drive, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.

Department of Geography, The University of Tennessee, 2407 River Drive, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2019 May 3;19(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6850-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-019-6850-x
PMID:31053068
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6499995/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Identifying disparities in myocardial infarction (MI) burden and assessing its temporal changes are critical for guiding resource allocation and policies geared towards reducing/eliminating health disparities. Our objectives were to: (a) investigate the spatial distribution and clusters of MI mortality risk in Florida; and (b) assess temporal changes in geographic disparities in MI mortality risks in Florida from 2000 to 2014.

METHODS

This is a retrospective ecologic study with county as the spatial unit of analysis. We obtained data for MI deaths occurring among Florida residents between 2000 and 2014 from the Florida Department of Health, and calculated county-level age-adjusted MI mortality risks and Spatial Empirical Bayesian smoothed MI mortality risks. We used Kulldorff's circular spatial scan statistics and Tango's flexible spatial scan statistics to identify spatial clusters.

RESULTS

There was an overall decline of 48% in MI mortality risks between 2000 and 2014. However, we found substantial, persistent disparities in MI mortality risks, with high-risk clusters occurring primarily in rural northern counties and low-risk clusters occurring exclusively in urban southern counties. MI mortality risks declined in both low- and high-risk clusters, but the latter showed more dramatic decreases during the first nine years of the study period. Consequently, the risk difference between the high- and low-risk clusters was smaller at the end than at the beginning of the study period. However, the rates of decline levelled off during the last six years of the study, and there are signs that the risks may be on an upward trend in parts of North Florida. Moreover, MI mortality risks for high-risk clusters at the end of the study period were on par with or above those for low-risk clusters at the beginning of the study period. Thus, high-risk clusters lagged behind low-risk clusters by at least 1.5 decades.

CONCLUSION

Myocardial infarction mortality risks have decreased substantially during the last 15 years, but persistent disparities in MI mortality burden still exist across Florida. Efforts to reduce these disparities will need to target prevention programs to counties in the high-risk clusters.

摘要

背景

识别心肌梗死(MI)负担的差异,并评估其时间变化,对于指导资源分配和制定旨在减少/消除健康差异的政策至关重要。我们的目标是:(a)调查佛罗里达州 MI 死亡率风险的空间分布和聚类;(b)评估 2000 年至 2014 年佛罗里达州 MI 死亡率风险的地理差异的时间变化。

方法

这是一项具有县级为空间分析单位的回顾性生态研究。我们从佛罗里达州卫生部获得了 2000 年至 2014 年期间发生在佛罗里达州居民中的 MI 死亡数据,并计算了县级年龄调整后的 MI 死亡率风险和空间经验贝叶斯平滑 MI 死亡率风险。我们使用 Kulldorff 的圆形空间扫描统计和 Tango 的灵活空间扫描统计来识别空间聚类。

结果

2000 年至 2014 年间,MI 死亡率风险总体下降了 48%。然而,我们发现 MI 死亡率风险存在显著且持续的差异,高风险聚类主要发生在北部农村县,低风险聚类仅发生在南部城市县。低风险和高风险聚类的 MI 死亡率风险均有所下降,但后者在研究期的前九年下降更为显著。因此,研究期开始时高风险和低风险聚类之间的风险差异较小,而研究期结束时风险差异较大。然而,在研究的最后六年中,下降速度趋于平稳,并且有迹象表明,佛罗里达州北部部分地区的风险可能呈上升趋势。此外,研究期末高风险聚类的 MI 死亡率风险与研究期初低风险聚类的 MI 死亡率风险相当或更高。因此,高风险聚类至少落后低风险聚类 1.5 个十年。

结论

在过去的 15 年中,MI 死亡率风险大幅下降,但佛罗里达州仍存在 MI 死亡率负担的持续差异。减少这些差异的努力需要将预防计划针对高风险聚类中的县。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f2e/6499995/79f2a14ab568/12889_2019_6850_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f2e/6499995/7cb9038e2e62/12889_2019_6850_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f2e/6499995/5317dd91fc58/12889_2019_6850_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f2e/6499995/f3ec2b2e7a17/12889_2019_6850_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f2e/6499995/9a684cec9bb2/12889_2019_6850_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f2e/6499995/f136a0f46773/12889_2019_6850_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f2e/6499995/79f2a14ab568/12889_2019_6850_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f2e/6499995/7cb9038e2e62/12889_2019_6850_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f2e/6499995/5317dd91fc58/12889_2019_6850_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f2e/6499995/f3ec2b2e7a17/12889_2019_6850_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f2e/6499995/9a684cec9bb2/12889_2019_6850_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f2e/6499995/f136a0f46773/12889_2019_6850_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f2e/6499995/79f2a14ab568/12889_2019_6850_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Geographic disparities and temporal changes in risk of death from myocardial infarction in Florida, 2000-2014.2000-2014 年佛罗里达州心肌梗死死亡风险的地理差异和时间变化。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 3;19(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6850-x.
2
Disparities in Temporal and Geographic Patterns of Myocardial Infarction Hospitalization Risks in Florida.佛罗里达州心肌梗死住院风险的时间和地理模式差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 27;16(23):4734. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234734.
3
Geographic disparities and temporal changes of diabetes-related mortality risks in Florida: a retrospective study.佛罗里达州糖尿病相关死亡率的地理差异和时间变化:一项回顾性研究。
PeerJ. 2024 Jun 27;12:e17408. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17408. eCollection 2024.
4
Neighborhood disparities in stroke and myocardial infarction mortality: a GIS and spatial scan statistics approach.社区间中风和心肌梗死死亡率的差异:GIS 和空间扫描统计方法。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Aug 12;11:644. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-644.
5
Geographic disparities in COVID-19 testing and outcomes in Florida.佛罗里达州 COVID-19 检测和结果的地域差异。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 11;23(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14450-9.
6
Geographic disparities and temporal changes of diabetes prevalence and diabetes self-management education program participation in Florida.佛罗里达州糖尿病患病率及糖尿病自我管理教育项目参与的地域差异和时间变化。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 16;16(7):e0254579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254579. eCollection 2021.
7
Investigation of geographic disparities of diabetes-related hospitalizations in Florida using flexible spatial scan statistics: An ecological study.利用灵活空间扫描统计调查佛罗里达州糖尿病住院相关的地理差异:一项生态研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 4;19(6):e0298182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298182. eCollection 2024.
8
An exploratory investigation of geographic disparities of stroke prevalence in Florida using circular and flexible spatial scan statistics.利用圆形和灵活的空间扫描统计方法探索佛罗里达州中风患病率的地理差异。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 30;14(8):e0218708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218708. eCollection 2019.
9
Sociodemographic Determinants of Acute Myocardial Infarction Hospitalization Risks in Florida.佛罗里达州急性心肌梗死住院风险的社会人口学决定因素。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jun 2;9(11):e012712. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012712. Epub 2020 May 19.
10
Geographic disparities and temporal changes of COVID-19 hospitalization risks in North Dakota.北达科他州 COVID-19 住院风险的地理差异和时间变化。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 16;11:1062177. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1062177. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Spatial Scan Statistics and Geographic Information Systems to Detect Monthly Human Mobility Clusters and Analyze Cluster Area Characteristics.利用空间扫描统计和地理信息系统检测月度人类流动聚集区并分析聚集区特征。
JMA J. 2024 Jul 16;7(3):319-327. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2023-0208. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
2
Determinants of disparities of diabetes-related hospitalization rates in Florida: a retrospective ecological study using a multiscale geographically weighted regression approach.佛罗里达州糖尿病相关住院率差异的决定因素:使用多尺度地理加权回归方法的回顾性生态研究。
Int J Health Geogr. 2024 Jan 6;23(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12942-023-00360-5.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Trends and Patterns of Geographic Variation in Cardiovascular Mortality Among US Counties, 1980-2014.1980 - 2014年美国各县心血管疾病死亡率的地理差异趋势与模式
JAMA. 2017 May 16;317(19):1976-1992. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.4150.
2
Health-Related Behaviors by Urban-Rural County Classification - United States, 2013.按城乡县分类划分的与健康相关行为 - 美国,2013年
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Feb 3;66(5):1-8. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6605a1.
3
Decline in Cardiovascular Mortality: Possible Causes and Implications.心血管疾病死亡率的下降:可能的原因及影响
Geographic disparities in COVID-19 testing and outcomes in Florida.
佛罗里达州 COVID-19 检测和结果的地域差异。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 11;23(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14450-9.
4
Trends and Inequalities in the Incidence of Acute Myocardial Infarction among Beijing Townships, 2007-2018.2007-2018 年北京市乡镇居民急性心肌梗死发病率的变化趋势及不平等分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 23;18(23):12276. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312276.
5
Geographic disparities and socio-demographic predictors of pertussis risk in Florida.佛罗里达州百日咳风险的地理差异和社会人口统计学预测因素
PeerJ. 2021 Aug 31;9:e11902. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11902. eCollection 2021.
6
Spatial and temporal analysis of myocardial infarction incidence in Zanjan province, Iran.伊朗赞詹省心肌梗死发病率的时空分析。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 14;21(1):1667. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11695-8.
7
Health service inequalities during the COVID-19 pandemic among elderly people living in large urban and non-urban areas in Florida, USA.美国佛罗里达州大城市和非城市地区老年人在新冠疫情期间的医疗服务不平等情况。
SAGE Open Med. 2020 Nov 24;8:2050312120974168. doi: 10.1177/2050312120974168. eCollection 2020.
8
Sociodemographic Determinants of Acute Myocardial Infarction Hospitalization Risks in Florida.佛罗里达州急性心肌梗死住院风险的社会人口学决定因素。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jun 2;9(11):e012712. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012712. Epub 2020 May 19.
9
Disparities in Temporal and Geographic Patterns of Myocardial Infarction Hospitalization Risks in Florida.佛罗里达州心肌梗死住院风险的时间和地理模式差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 27;16(23):4734. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234734.
Circ Res. 2017 Jan 20;120(2):366-380. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309115.
4
Recent Trends in Cardiovascular Mortality in the United States and Public Health Goals.美国心血管死亡率的最新趋势和公共卫生目标。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Aug 1;1(5):594-9. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.1326.
5
Changes in the Geographic Patterns of Heart Disease Mortality in the United States: 1973 to 2010.1973年至2010年美国心脏病死亡率的地理模式变化
Circulation. 2016 Mar 22;133(12):1171-80. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018663.
6
Does Place of Residence or Time of Year Affect the Risk of Stroke Hospitalization and Death? A Descriptive Spatial and Temporal Epidemiologic Study.居住地点或年份时间会影响中风住院和死亡风险吗?一项描述性时空流行病学研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 22;11(1):e0145224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145224. eCollection 2016.
7
Temporal Trends in Mortality in the United States, 1969-2013.美国 1969-2013 年死亡率的时间趋势。
JAMA. 2015 Oct 27;314(16):1731-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12319.
8
Social Determinants of Risk and Outcomes for Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.心血管疾病风险与预后的社会决定因素:美国心脏协会科学声明
Circulation. 2015 Sep 1;132(9):873-98. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000228. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
9
Role of community health outreach program "living for health" in improving access to federally qualified health centers in Miami-dade county, Florida: a cross-sectional study.社区健康外展项目“为健康而活”在改善佛罗里达州迈阿密-戴德县联邦合格健康中心就医机会方面的作用:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr 28;15:181. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0826-z.
10
Neighborhood geographic disparities in heart attack and stroke mortality: comparison of global and local modeling approaches.心脏病发作和中风死亡率的邻里地理差异:全球和局部建模方法的比较
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2014 Oct;11:109-23. doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Oct 22.