Lancaster Christian Academy, Smyrna, TN, 37167, USA.
Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
Mod Pathol. 2019 Oct;32(10):1421-1433. doi: 10.1038/s41379-019-0278-9. Epub 2019 May 3.
Adequacy of surgical resection margins for soft tissue sarcomas are poorly defined because of the various classifications and definitions used in prior studies of heterogeneous patient cohorts and inconsistent margin sampling protocols. Surgical resection margins of 166 primary, high-grade, pleomorphic sarcomas of the extremity or trunk were classified according to American Joint Committee on Cancer R and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society categories, as well as by metric distance and tissue composition. None of the cases were treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Multivariable competing risk regression models were evaluated and optimal surgical resection margins for each classification system were defined. Minimum safe tumor clearance was 5 mm without use of adjuvant radiotherapy and 1 mm with adjuvant radiotherapy. Predictive accuracy of margin classification systems was compared by area under receiver-operating characteristic curves generated from logistic regression of 2½-year local recurrence-free survival and other standard tests of diagnostic accuracy. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society and margin distance classifications performed similarly, both of which showed higher sensitivity and negative predictive value compared to the American Joint Committee on Cancer R classification. The prognostic power of close or positive margins in prediction models significantly increased when six or more slides were submitted for assessment of surgical resection margins. Surgical resection margins for soft tissue sarcoma should be reported using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society classification or metric distance to the closest resection margin. Musculoskeletal Tumor Society wide/radical margins or tumor clearances of 5 mm (without adjuvant radiotherapy) or 1 mm (with adjuvant radiotherapy) appear to define the minimum safe surgical resection margins necessary to decrease the likelihood of local recurrence of high-grade pleomorphic sarcomas of the extremity or trunk.
软组织肉瘤的手术切缘是否充分定义不明确,这是因为在先前研究异质患者队列和不一致的切缘取样方案时使用了各种分类和定义。根据美国癌症联合委员会 R 分类和肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会分类,以及根据度量距离和组织成分,对 166 例肢体或躯干的原发性高级别多形性肉瘤的手术切缘进行了分类。这些病例均未接受新辅助治疗。评估了多变量竞争风险回归模型,并为每个分类系统定义了最佳手术切缘。在不使用辅助放疗的情况下,最小安全肿瘤清除距离为 5mm,使用辅助放疗时为 1mm。通过对 2.5 年局部无复发生存率的逻辑回归和其他标准诊断准确性测试生成的接收器工作特征曲线下面积,比较了切缘分类系统的预测准确性。肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会和切缘距离分类的表现相似,与美国癌症联合委员会 R 分类相比,这两种分类的敏感性和阴性预测值都更高。在预测模型中,当提交 6 个或更多切片评估手术切缘时,接近或阳性切缘的预后能力显著增加。软组织肉瘤的手术切缘应使用肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会分类或与最近切缘的度量距离来报告。肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会广泛/根治性切缘或 5mm(无辅助放疗)或 1mm(有辅助放疗)的肿瘤清除似乎定义了降低肢体或躯干高级别多形性肉瘤局部复发可能性所需的最小安全手术切缘。