Thauvin C, Eliopoulos G M, Willey S, Wennersten C, Moellering R C
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Feb;31(2):139-43. doi: 10.1128/AAC.31.2.139.
Intermittent administration of ampicillin alone has resulted in high failure rates in previously described animal models of enterococcal endocarditis. We developed a rat model of enterococcal endocarditis which permits comparison of continuous intravenous infusion of ampicillin with intramuscular therapy. Continuous low-dose ampicillin infusion (450 mg/kg [body weight] per day) was compared with the same dose given intramuscularly in three divided doses and with high-dose infusion (4.5 g/kg per day) of the drug. For the infecting strain of Streptococcus faecalis, the MIC and MBC were 1 microgram/ml. Mean ampicillin levels in serum were 53.9 +/- 4.8 (peak) and less than 1 (trough), 8.7 +/- 1.4, and 244 +/- 29 micrograms/ml for intramuscular, low-dose, and high-dose regimens, respectively. Ampicillin infusion therapy significantly increased the survival rate and sterilization of blood cultures. Continuous infusions were superior to intermittent therapy in eradicating bacteremia. After 5 days of treatment, low-dose ampicillin infusion was more effective than intermittent therapy in sterilizing cardiac vegetations (P less than 0.01). Continuous-infusion therapy at either dose was significantly more effective than intramuscular injection in reducing bacterial titers in cardiac vegetations (5.4 +/- 1.0 log10 CFU/g [low dose], 4.8 +/- 0.3 log10 CFU/g [high dose], and 7.7 +/- 0.3 log10 CFU/g [intramuscular]). However, no statistically significant advantage was found for high-dose compared with low-dose ampicillin infusion in lowering bacterial titers in vegetations (P greater than 0.3).
在先前描述的肠球菌性心内膜炎动物模型中,单独间歇性给予氨苄西林导致了较高的失败率。我们建立了一种肠球菌性心内膜炎大鼠模型,该模型可用于比较氨苄西林持续静脉输注与肌肉注射治疗的效果。将氨苄西林持续低剂量输注(每天450mg/kg[体重])与相同剂量分三次肌肉注射以及高剂量输注(每天4.5g/kg)进行比较。对于粪肠球菌感染菌株,其最低抑菌浓度(MIC)和最低杀菌浓度(MBC)均为1μg/ml。肌肉注射、低剂量和高剂量给药方案的血清氨苄西林平均水平分别为53.9±4.8(峰值)和低于1(谷值)、8.7±1.4以及244±29μg/ml。氨苄西林输注治疗显著提高了生存率并使血培养结果转为无菌。在根除菌血症方面,持续输注优于间歇性治疗。治疗5天后,低剂量氨苄西林输注在使心脏赘生物无菌方面比间歇性治疗更有效(P<0.01)。两种剂量的持续输注治疗在降低心脏赘生物中的细菌滴度方面均显著优于肌肉注射(5.4±1.0log10CFU/g[低剂量],4.8±0.3log10CFU/g[高剂量],以及7.7±0.3log10CFU/g[肌肉注射])。然而,在降低赘生物中细菌滴度方面,高剂量氨苄西林输注与低剂量相比未发现统计学上的显著优势(P>0.3)。