• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床研究的规划与实施:全过程

Planning and Conducting Clinical Research: The Whole Process.

作者信息

Chew Boon-How

机构信息

Family Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, MYS.

出版信息

Cureus. 2019 Feb 20;11(2):e4112. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4112.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.4112
PMID:31058006
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6476607/
Abstract

The goal of this review was to present the essential steps in the entire process of clinical research. Research should begin with an educated idea arising from a clinical practice issue. A research topic rooted in a clinical problem provides the motivation for the completion of the research and relevancy for affecting medical practice changes and improvements. The research idea is further informed through a systematic literature review, clarified into a conceptual framework, and defined into an answerable research question. Engagement with clinical experts, experienced researchers, relevant stakeholders of the research topic, and even patients can enhance the research question's relevance, feasibility, and efficiency. Clinical research can be completed in two major steps: study designing and study reporting. Three study designs should be planned in sequence and iterated until properly refined: theoretical design, data collection design, and statistical analysis design. The design of data collection could be further categorized into three facets: experimental or non-experimental, sampling or census, and time features of the variables to be studied. The ultimate aims of research reporting are to present findings succinctly and timely. Concise, explicit, and complete reporting are the guiding principles in clinical studies reporting.

摘要

本综述的目的是介绍临床研究全过程的基本步骤。研究应始于源于临床实践问题的一个有根据的想法。一个植根于临床问题的研究主题为完成研究提供了动力,并与影响医学实践的变化和改进具有相关性。通过系统的文献综述进一步完善研究想法,将其提炼成一个概念框架,并界定为一个可回答的研究问题。与临床专家、经验丰富的研究人员、研究主题的相关利益攸关方甚至患者进行交流,可提高研究问题的相关性、可行性和效率。临床研究可分两个主要步骤完成:研究设计和研究报告。应依次规划并反复进行三种研究设计,直至完善:理论设计、数据收集设计和统计分析设计。数据收集设计可进一步细分为三个方面:实验性或非实验性、抽样或普查以及待研究变量的时间特征。研究报告的最终目的是简洁、及时地呈现研究结果。简洁、明确和完整的报告是临床研究报告的指导原则。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7cc/6476607/735d31943448/cureus-0011-00000004112-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7cc/6476607/9da0d08de4f2/cureus-0011-00000004112-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7cc/6476607/d7453d2a2f69/cureus-0011-00000004112-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7cc/6476607/dca898b1c6e9/cureus-0011-00000004112-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7cc/6476607/735d31943448/cureus-0011-00000004112-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7cc/6476607/9da0d08de4f2/cureus-0011-00000004112-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7cc/6476607/d7453d2a2f69/cureus-0011-00000004112-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7cc/6476607/dca898b1c6e9/cureus-0011-00000004112-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7cc/6476607/735d31943448/cureus-0011-00000004112-i04.jpg

相似文献

1
Planning and Conducting Clinical Research: The Whole Process.临床研究的规划与实施:全过程
Cureus. 2019 Feb 20;11(2):e4112. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4112.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The Refinement of Topics for Systematic Reviews: Lessons and Recommendations From the Effective Health Care Program系统评价主题的细化:有效医疗保健项目的经验教训与建议
5
[Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].[氯化乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验标准技术规范(2023年)]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 12;47(2):101-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20231019-00247.
6
7
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
8
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
9
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
10
Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).大分子拥挤现象:化学与物理邂逅生物学(瑞士阿斯科纳,2012年6月10日至14日)
Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic technologies for neuroblastoma.神经母细胞瘤的诊断技术
Lab Chip. 2025 Jul 14. doi: 10.1039/d4lc00005f.
2
SQUARE-IT: a proposed approach to square the identified research problem in the literature with the objectives, the appropriate clinical research question, and the research hypothesis.SQUARE-IT:一种将文献中已确定的研究问题与研究目标、恰当的临床研究问题及研究假设进行匹配的提议方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Jan 27;25(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02468-7.
3
Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: A Comprehensive Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Generating Research Questions Appropriate for Qualitative Studies in Health Professions Education.生成适用于健康职业教育定性研究的研究问题。
Acad Med. 2016 Dec;91(12):e16. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001438.
2
Generating Good Research Questions in Health Professions Education.在健康职业教育中提出优秀的研究问题。
Acad Med. 2016 Dec;91(12):e8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001413.
3
Analysis of matched case-control studies.匹配病例对照研究分析
临床试验与临床研究:全面综述
Cureus. 2023 Feb 16;15(2):e35077. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35077. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
Methodology for clinical research.临床研究方法。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2022 Oct 17;63(2 Suppl 3):E267-E278. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.2S3.2769. eCollection 2022 Jun.
5
Red blood cells morphology and morphometry in adult, senior, and geriatricians dogs by optical and scanning electron microscopy.成年、老年和高龄犬红细胞的形态学及形态测量学研究:光学显微镜和扫描电子显微镜观察
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Nov 10;9:998438. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.998438. eCollection 2022.
6
Effect of age, sex, and body size on the blood biochemistry and physiological constants of dogs from 4 wk. to > 52 wk. of age.从 4 周到 >52 周龄犬的年龄、性别和体型对血液生化和生理常数的影响。
BMC Vet Res. 2021 Aug 6;17(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02976-w.
BMJ. 2016 Feb 25;352:i969. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i969.
4
How systematic reviews cause research waste.系统评价如何导致研究浪费。
Lancet. 2015 Oct 17;386(10003):1536. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00489-4.
5
Benchmarking Controlled Trial--a novel concept covering all observational effectiveness studies.基准对照试验——一个涵盖所有观察性有效性研究的新概念。
Ann Med. 2015 Jun;47(4):332-40. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2015.1027255. Epub 2015 May 12.
6
How to make more published research true.如何让更多已发表的研究成果真实可靠。
PLoS Med. 2014 Oct 21;11(10):e1001747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001747. eCollection 2014 Oct.
7
How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set.如何在设定研究重点时增加价值和减少浪费。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):156-65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62229-1. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
8
A pragmatic view on pragmatic trials.关于实用性试验的务实观点。
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2011;13(2):217-24. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2011.13.2/npatsopoulos.
9
Matching, an appealing method to avoid confounding?匹配,一种避免混杂的有吸引力的方法?
Nephron Clin Pract. 2011;118(4):c315-8. doi: 10.1159/000323136. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
10
Why match? Investigating matched case-control study designs with causal effect estimation.为何进行匹配?探讨用于因果效应估计的匹配病例对照研究设计。
Int J Biostat. 2009 Jan 6;5(1):Article 1. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1127.