Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Shock. 2019 Aug;52(2):152-159. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001368.
Fever is common in mechanically ventilated patients and may be uniquely detrimental in those with lung injury because of its injurious effects on pulmonary vascular permeability and alveolar epithelium. We evaluated the association of fever and antipyretic medication with mortality in mechanically ventilated emergency department (ED) patients.
This is a retrospective cohort study of 1,264 patients requiring mechanical ventilation initiated in the ED with subsequent admission to an intensive care unit. Maximum body temperature was recorded for the first 24 h after ED admission and categorized into four categories: <37°C, 37°C to 38.2°C, 38.3°C to 39.4°C, and ≥39.5°C. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. We conducted a planned subgroup analysis of patients with sepsis at the time of intubation. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) were used to assess the relationship between temperature, antipyretics, and mortality.
Multivariable Cox proportional HRs demonstrated that a maximum temperature ≥39.5°C was associated with increased mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.59 [95% confidence interval, CI, 1.05-2.39]). In the subgroup of patients with sepsis, a maximum temperature of 38.3°C to 39.4°C was associated with survival (aHR 0.61 [95% CI, 0.39-0.99]). There was no difference in 28-day mortality between patients who did and did not receive antipyretic medication in either the overall cohort or the septic subgroup.
High fever (≥39.5°C) was associated with increased risk for mortality in mechanically ventilated patients. However, in patients with sepsis, moderate fever (38.3°C-39.4°C) was protective. Antipyretic medication was not associated with changes in outcome. This suggests that fever may have different implications in septic versus nonseptic mechanically ventilated patients.
发热在机械通气患者中很常见,由于其对肺血管通透性和肺泡上皮的损伤作用,在肺损伤患者中可能具有独特的危害性。我们评估了发热和退热药物与机械通气急诊科(ED)患者死亡率的关系。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 1264 名在 ED 接受机械通气并随后转入 ICU 的患者。记录 ED 入院后 24 小时内的最高体温,并分为四个类别:<37°C、37°C 至 38.2°C、38.3°C 至 39.4°C 和≥39.5°C。主要结局为 28 天死亡率。我们对插管时患有败血症的患者进行了计划的亚组分析。多变量 Cox 比例风险比(HR)用于评估体温、退热药物与死亡率之间的关系。
多变量 Cox 比例 HR 显示,最高体温≥39.5°C 与死亡率增加相关(调整后的危险比[aHR] 1.59 [95%置信区间,CI,1.05-2.39])。在败血症亚组中,最高体温 38.3°C 至 39.4°C 与存活相关(aHR 0.61 [95%CI,0.39-0.99])。在整个队列或败血症亚组中,接受与未接受退热药物的患者在 28 天死亡率方面没有差异。
高热(≥39.5°C)与机械通气患者的死亡风险增加相关。然而,在败血症患者中,中度发热(38.3°C-39.4°C)具有保护作用。退热药物与结局无变化相关。这表明发热在败血症与非败血症机械通气患者中的意义可能不同。