J Refract Surg. 2019 May 1;35(5):274-279. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190404-01.
To examine the effect of manifest refraction spherical equivalent error on visual acuity at various distances in eyes that received a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL).
Sixty eyes of 30 patients who underwent bilateral implantation of a trifocal IOL (Alcon PanOptix TFNT00; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX) were enrolled. Corrected visual acuity from far to near distances was measured using an all-distance vision tester after simulating the spherical equivalent error by adding spherical lenses with refractive powers of +1.00, +0.50, 0.00, -0.50, and -1.00 diopters (D); addition of a plus lens simulates myopia, whereas addition of a minus lens simulates hyperopia.
Mean visual acuity at all distances differed significantly among the spherical lens added groups (P ≤ .0374). Mean distance visual acuity at infinity, 5, and 3 m was significantly worse in all lens added groups (+1.00, +0.50, -0.50, and -1.00 D) than in the no lens group (P < .0001). Mean intermediate visual acuity at 1 and 0.7 m did not differ significantly between each of the lens added groups and the no lens group. Mean near visual acuity at 0.3 m was significantly better in the +1.00 and +0.50 D groups and significantly worse in the -0.50 and -1.00 D groups than in the no lens group (P ≤ .0044).
A manifest spherical equivalent error of slight myopia significantly improved near visual acuity but worsened distance visual acuity, whereas that of slight hyperopia worsened both distance and near visual acuity in eyes with trifocal IOLs, suggesting that slight myopia is a better target refraction than slight hyperopia, although emmetropia is the optimum target. [J Refract Surg. 2019;35(5):274-279.].
研究在植入三焦点人工晶状体(IOL)的眼中,明视折射等效球镜误差对不同距离视力的影响。
纳入 30 例(60 只眼)患者,这些患者均接受了双侧三焦点 IOL(Alcon PanOptix TFNT00;Alcon Laboratories,Inc.,德克萨斯州沃思堡)植入术。通过添加屈光度为+1.00、+0.50、0.00、-0.50 和-1.00 屈光度的球面透镜来模拟等效球镜误差,使用全距离视力测试仪测量从远到近的矫正视力;添加正透镜模拟近视,而添加负透镜模拟远视。
添加球面透镜的各组之间各距离的平均视力均有显著差异(P≤0.0374)。在所有添加透镜组(+1.00、+0.50、-0.50 和-1.00 D)中,无限远、5 米和 3 米的平均距离视力明显差于无透镜组(P<0.0001)。在添加透镜的各组和无透镜组之间,1 米和 0.7 米的平均中间视力没有显著差异。在+1.00 和+0.50 D 组中,0.3 米的平均近视力明显更好,而在-0.50 和-1.00 D 组中,0.3 米的平均近视力明显更差,与无透镜组相比(P≤0.0044)。
轻微近视的明视等效球镜误差显著提高了近视力,但却降低了远视力,而轻微远视则降低了远、近视力,这表明轻微近视是比轻微远视更好的目标屈光度,尽管正视是最佳目标。[J Refract Surg. 2019;35(5):274-279.]。