Amatneeks Thaís Malucelli, Hamdan Amer Cavalheiro
Fundação Pró-Renal, Setor de Psicologia, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
Universidade Federal do Paraná, Departamento de Psicologia, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
J Bras Nefrol. 2019 Jan-Mar;41(1):112-123. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2018-0086. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
There is evidence in the literature that cognitive impairment is more prevalent in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) than in the general population. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is an instrument with a good application profile for cognitive evaluation of patients with CKD-like impairments. The objective of this study is to perform a systematic review of MoCA use in the context of CKD.
The keywords "Montreal Cognitive Assessment", "Kidney Disease" and "Chronic Kidney Disease" were used to search the databases. The inclusion criteria were: a) empirical articles; b) approach to cognitive impairment in CKD; c) papers in Portuguese and English.
The studies were mostly cross-sectional, published in medical journals, with research carried out mostly in Europe. About 45% of the studies had samples of less than 150 participants and variations in the prevalence of cognitive impairment were found ranging from 28.9% to 74.6%. The cutoff point for the identification of the impairment presented variation between the studies.
The results' analysis demonstrates the need for more complete studies on MoCA scoring and adaptation in its different versions. We recommend to the health professionals who will use the results in the clinical setting that the interpretation of the results be made in the light of studies more related to the context lived by the patients.
The instrument is efficient to be used in several stages and treatment modalities of the disease. We point to the need to adapt a cut-off point for the instrument in the different translations of the instrument.
文献中有证据表明,慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者的认知障碍比普通人群更为普遍。蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)是一种在评估类似CKD损伤患者的认知方面具有良好应用前景的工具。本研究的目的是对CKD背景下MoCA的使用进行系统评价。
使用关键词“蒙特利尔认知评估量表”“肾脏疾病”和“慢性肾脏病”检索数据库。纳入标准为:a)实证文章;b)CKD认知障碍研究方法;c)葡萄牙语和英语论文。
这些研究大多为横断面研究,发表在医学期刊上,研究主要在欧洲进行。约45%的研究样本量不足150名参与者,认知障碍患病率在28.9%至74.6%之间存在差异。各研究中识别障碍的临界值有所不同。
结果分析表明,需要对MoCA不同版本的评分和适应性进行更全面的研究。我们建议在临床环境中使用结果的卫生专业人员,根据与患者实际生活背景更相关的研究来解释结果。
该工具在疾病的多个阶段和治疗方式中使用是有效的。我们指出,需要针对该工具的不同翻译版本调整临界值。