Department of Psychology & Institute of Liberal Arts,Emory University,Atlanta,GA
Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Jan;41:e38. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17000632.
We support John Doris's criticism of "reflectivism" but identify three shortcomings: (1) his neglect of humans' evolved predispositions and tendencies, (2) his failure to appreciate that identity and responsibility arise first from parsing our world ontologically, in a process we call "existential framing," and (3) a potentially alarming implication of his "dialogic" model of identity formation: if identity is negotiated across diverse social situations, why isn't dissociative identity disorder more common?
我们支持约翰·多里斯（John Doris）对“反思主义”的批评，但发现了三个不足之处：（1）他忽视了人类进化的倾向和倾向；（2）他没有意识到身份和责任首先来自于对我们世界的本体论解析，这一过程我们称之为“存在框架”；（3）他的身份形成“对话”模式的一个潜在令人担忧的影响：如果身份是在不同的社会情况下协商的，那么为什么分离性身份障碍不那么常见？
