Neurosurgery and Spine Specialists,Eastern Maine Medical Center,Bangor,ME
Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Jan;41:e51. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17000759.
In this commentary, I highlight the importance of a proper discussion of the pragmatic implications of John Doris's paradigm for allocation of personal responsibility proposed in his new book Talking to Our Selves. By employing some classic concepts of the American common law tradition, I discuss why Doris's valuational understanding of agency fails to provide an adequate framework for moral responsibility, social accountability, and legal liability.
在这篇评论中，我强调了适当讨论约翰·多里斯（John Doris）在其新书《与自我对话》中提出的个人责任分配实用主义含义的重要性。通过运用美国普通法传统的一些经典概念，我讨论了为什么多里斯对能动性的价值理解未能为道德责任、社会问责制和法律责任提供一个充分的框架。
