Arendrup Maiken Cavling, Andersen Jakob S, Holten Mads Kristian, Krarup Kenneth B, Reiter Nanna, Schierbeck Jens, Helleberg Marie
Unit of Mycology, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Mar 25;6(5):ofz136. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz136. eCollection 2019 May.
Invasive candidiasis (IC) comprises candidemia and deep-seated candidiasis. Blood culture (BC) is the gold standard test, but sensitivity is low. T2Candida is a new diagnostic test. We investigated the performance of T2Candida, BC, and mannan antigen (MAg) for detection of IC in a high-risk intensive care unit (ICU) population.
One-hundred twenty-six ICU patients at high risk of IC with sepsis despite 3 days of broad-spectrum antibiotics were included. Paired BC, T2Candida, and MAg were obtained twice weekly (334 sets). Patients were classified into proven, likely, possible, or unlikely IC based on patient record review.
At enrollment, 92 (77%) patients were receiving antifungal therapy (mainly fluconazole 66%). Fifteen (11.9%) patients were positive by BC (n = 4), T2Candida (n = 11), or MAg (n = 10). The T2Candida species distribution at inclusion ( /: 8/11 [72.3%] and /: 3/11 [27.3%]) was supported by the identification of BC or colonizing isolates in 10/11 cases. Patients were classified with proven (11), likely (6), possible (11), and unlikely (98) IC. Defining IC as proven/proven&likely/proven&likely&possible, respectively, the sensitivity was as follows: T2Candida (55%/59%/39%), BC (45%/29%/ 8%), and MAg (36%/41%/32%). The negative predictive value was similar across the tests for proven vs others and proven/likely vs others (94%-96% and 90%-95%, respectively). For test combinations including T2Candida, the sensitivity increased to 64%-65%, without hampering the positive predictive value.
In conclusion, although the diagnostic performance was modest for all the tests, the combination of T2Candida and BC seemed to have the best diagnostic performance, and thus implementation of T2Candida may improve the diagnosis of IC.
侵袭性念珠菌病(IC)包括念珠菌血症和深部念珠菌病。血培养(BC)是金标准检测方法,但敏感性较低。T2念珠菌检测是一种新的诊断检测方法。我们在一个高危重症监护病房(ICU)人群中研究了T2念珠菌检测、血培养和甘露聚糖抗原(MAg)检测对IC的诊断性能。
纳入126例尽管接受了3天广谱抗生素治疗但仍有患IC和脓毒症高风险的ICU患者。每周两次采集配对的血培养、T2念珠菌检测样本和MAg样本(共334组)。根据患者病历审查将患者分为确诊、很可能、可能或不太可能患IC。
入组时,92例(77%)患者正在接受抗真菌治疗(主要是氟康唑,占66%)。15例(11.9%)患者血培养(n = 4)、T2念珠菌检测(n = 11)或MAg检测(n = 10)呈阳性。纳入时T2念珠菌的菌种分布(白色念珠菌:8/11 [72.3%] 和热带念珠菌:3/11 [27.3%])在10/11例病例中通过血培养鉴定或定植菌鉴定得到了证实。患者被分类为确诊IC(11例)、很可能患IC(6例)、可能患IC(11例)和不太可能患IC(98例)。分别将IC定义为确诊/确诊&很可能/确诊&很可能&可能,敏感性如下:T2念珠菌检测(55%/59%/39%)、血培养(45%/29%/8%)和MAg检测(36%/41%/32%)。对于确诊与其他情况以及确诊/很可能与其他情况,各检测方法的阴性预测值相似(分别为94% - 96%和90% - 95%)。对于包括T2念珠菌检测的检测组合,敏感性提高到64% - 65%,且不影响阳性预测值。
总之,尽管所有检测方法的诊断性能一般,但T2念珠菌检测和血培养的组合似乎具有最佳诊断性能,因此采用T2念珠菌检测可能会改善IC的诊断。