• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏康复后患者对生活质量评估的反应转移效应。

Response shift effects in patients' assessments of their quality of life after cardiac rehabilitation.

机构信息

Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Institute of Educational Sciences, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2019 Sep;28(9):2609-2620. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02195-9. Epub 2019 May 8.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-019-02195-9
PMID:31069601
Abstract

PURPOSE

The effect of intervention programs on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) can be underestimated due to response shift effects. This study aims to compare HRQoL between cardiac patients taking part in a rehabilitation program and the general population and to investigate changes in HRQoL in terms of response shift with two approaches.

METHODS

A sample of 282 cardiac rehabilitation inpatients (response rate: 58.9%) responded to the self-report quality of life questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline (during rehabilitation) and three months later (actual and retrospective judgment). Their HRQoL was compared to that of the general population. Response shift evaluation complemented the thentest with the structural equation modeling approach.

RESULTS

Compared to the general population, patients showed impaired quality of life on all scales (Hedges' g between 0.31 and 1.57). The complementation of the thentest with the structural equation modeling approach revealed response shift effects in physical, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning. No effects were found in role functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of both the thentest and the structural equation modeling approaches proved to be essential for obtaining comprehensive statistical evidence that response shift can distort measurements of change. Our results suggest that studies that use the thentest to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions should complement their analyses with the structural equation modeling approach to avoid biased effects.

摘要

目的

由于反应转移效应的存在,干预计划对健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的影响可能被低估。本研究旨在比较参加康复计划的心脏病患者与一般人群的 HRQoL,并通过两种方法研究 HRQoL 的反应转移变化。

方法

本研究采用自我报告生活质量问卷 EORTC QLQ-C30,对 282 名心脏康复住院患者(应答率:58.9%)进行了基线(康复期间)和三个月后的(实际和回顾性判断)调查。将他们的 HRQoL 与一般人群进行比较。反应转移评估通过结构方程建模方法对传统测试进行补充。

结果

与一般人群相比,患者在所有量表上的生活质量都较差(Hedges'g 在 0.31 到 1.57 之间)。通过结构方程建模方法对传统测试的补充显示,在身体、情感、认知和社会功能方面存在反应转移效应。在角色功能方面未发现任何影响。

结论

传统测试和结构方程建模方法的结合对于获得反应转移可能会扭曲变化测量的全面统计证据是至关重要的。我们的结果表明,使用传统测试来评估干预效果的研究应该用结构方程建模方法来补充其分析,以避免有偏的影响。

相似文献

1
Response shift effects in patients' assessments of their quality of life after cardiac rehabilitation.心脏康复后患者对生活质量评估的反应转移效应。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Sep;28(9):2609-2620. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02195-9. Epub 2019 May 8.
2
Response shift effects of quality of life assessments in breast cancer survivors.乳腺癌幸存者生活质量评估中的反应转移效应
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Mar;28(2):e12979. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12979. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
3
Using a retrospective pretest instead of a conventional pretest is replacing biases: a qualitative study of cognitive processes underlying responses to thentest items.使用回顾性预测试而非传统预测试正在消除偏差:一项关于对后续测试项目反应背后认知过程的定性研究。
Qual Life Res. 2016 Jun;25(6):1327-37. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1175-4. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
4
Prostate cancer patients' quality of life assessments across the primary treatment trajectory: 'True' change or response shift?前列腺癌患者在主要治疗过程中的生活质量评估:“真实”变化还是反应转移?
Acta Oncol. 2016 Jul;55(7):814-20. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1136749. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
5
Methods to detect response shift in quality of life data: a convergent validity study.生活质量数据中反应转移的检测方法:一项收敛效度研究。
Qual Life Res. 2005 Apr;14(3):629-39. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-2577-x.
6
Response Shift-Adjusted Treatment Effect on Health-Related Quality of Life in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Taxane Versus S-1 for Metastatic Breast Cancer: Structural Equation Modeling.紫杉类药物与 S-1 治疗转移性乳腺癌的随机对照试验中健康相关生活质量的反应转移调整治疗效果:结构方程模型。
Value Health. 2020 Jun;23(6):768-774. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.02.003. Epub 2020 May 17.
7
Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量
Dan Med Bull. 2010 Sep;57(9):B4184.
8
Improvement of quality of life and psychological distress after inpatient cancer rehabilitation : Results of a longitudinal observational study.住院癌症康复后生活质量和心理困扰的改善:一项纵向观察性研究的结果
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2017 Oct;129(19-20):692-701. doi: 10.1007/s00508-017-1266-z. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
9
Response shift effects in the assessment of urologic cancer patients' quality of life.在评估泌尿科癌症患者生活质量时的反应转移效应。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Jul;28(4):e13027. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13027. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
10
Impact of the occurrence of a response shift on the determination of the minimal important difference in a health-related quality of life score over time.随着时间推移,反应转移的发生对健康相关生活质量评分中最小重要差异判定的影响。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Dec 3;14(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0569-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Health-related quality of life in patients accessing medicinal cannabis in Australia: The QUEST initiative results of a 3-month follow-up observational study.澳大利亚接受药用大麻治疗的患者的健康相关生活质量:QUEST 计划为期 3 个月的随访观察性研究结果。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 6;18(9):e0290549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290549. eCollection 2023.
2
Midwives' empathy and shared decision making from women's perspective - sensitivity of an assessment to compare quality of care in prenatal and obstetric care.从女性视角看助产士的同理心和共同决策 - 评估敏感性,以比较产前和产科护理的护理质量。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Sep 20;22(1):717. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05041-y.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Tools for assessing quality of life in cardiology and cardiac surgery.评估心脏病学和心脏外科生活质量的工具。
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2016 Mar;13(1):78-82. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2016.58974. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
2
Prostate cancer patients' quality of life assessments across the primary treatment trajectory: 'True' change or response shift?前列腺癌患者在主要治疗过程中的生活质量评估:“真实”变化还是反应转移?
Acta Oncol. 2016 Jul;55(7):814-20. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1136749. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
3
Replication and validation of higher order models demonstrated that a summary score for the EORTC QLQ-C30 is robust.
A Quality-of-Life Evaluation Study Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Receiving Medicinal Cannabis (the QUEST Initiative): Protocol for a Longitudinal Observational Study.
一项评估接受药用大麻患者健康相关生活质量的生活质量评估研究(QUEST计划):一项纵向观察性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Nov 24;10(11):e32327. doi: 10.2196/32327.
4
Do patients suffering from chronic diseases retrospectively overestimate how healthy they were before they fell ill?患有慢性病的患者是否会在回顾时高估自己生病前的健康状况?
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2021 Sep-Dec;21(3):100230. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2021.100230. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
5
Health-related quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma participating in a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program.多发性骨髓瘤患者参与多学科康复计划的健康相关生活质量。
Ann Hematol. 2021 Sep;100(9):2311-2323. doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-04356-0. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
6
Selection of a quality of life instrument for polio survivors in Northwest Nigeria.尼日利亚西北部脊灰幸存者生存质量工具的选择。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Sep 21;18(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01552-4.
高阶模型的复制与验证表明,欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量核心问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)的综合得分是可靠的。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
4
Evaluating response shift in training evaluation: comparing the retrospective pretest with an adapted measurement invariance approach in a classroom management training program.评估培训评估中的反应转移:在一个课堂管理培训项目中,将回顾性预测试与一种适应性测量不变性方法进行比较。
Eval Rev. 2014 Oct;38(5):420-48. doi: 10.1177/0193841X14546932. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
5
European reference values for the quality of life questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30: Results of a German investigation and a summarizing analysis of six European general population normative studies.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷QLQ-C30的欧洲参考值:一项德国调查结果及六项欧洲普通人群规范研究的汇总分析
Acta Oncol. 2014 Jul;53(7):958-65. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.879998. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
6
Self-reported health status in coronary heart disease patients: a comparison with the general population.冠心病患者的自我报告健康状况:与普通人群的比较。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015 Apr;14(2):117-25. doi: 10.1177/1474515113519930. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
7
Normative data of the EORTC QLQ-C30 for the German population: a population-based survey.EORTC QLQ-C30 德国人群常模数据:一项基于人群的调查。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 10;8(9):e74149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074149. eCollection 2013.
8
Cardiovascular health: the importance of measuring patient-reported health status: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.心血管健康:测量患者报告的健康状况的重要性:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2013 Jun 4;127(22):2233-49. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182949a2e. Epub 2013 May 6.
9
Number and burden of cardiovascular diseases in relation to health-related quality of life in a cross-sectional population-based cohort study.在一项基于横断面人群的队列研究中,心血管疾病的数量和负担与健康相关生活质量的关系。
BMJ Open. 2012 Oct 25;2(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001554. Print 2012.
10
Evidence-based guidelines for interpreting change scores for the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心 30 组变化评分的循证指南。
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Jul;48(11):1713-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.02.059. Epub 2012 Mar 12.