Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury , Christchurch , New Zealand.
The Cannan Institute, Belmont Private Hospital , Brisbane , Australia.
J Trauma Dissociation. 2019 Oct-Dec;20(5):526-547. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2019.1597809. Epub 2019 May 9.
While evidence suggests a division between two qualitatively distinct forms of dissociation, no scale has been specifically designed to differentiate between them. This study describes the development and validation of the Detachment and Compartmentalization Inventory (DCI). The DCI was developed from dissociation theory, 29 existing dissociation scales and expert opinion. An initial pilot study was conducted which assessed readability, explored validity and reduced items before the DCI was administered online to 89 nonclinical and 105 clinical participants. The Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES), Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire (SDQ), and Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) were included in the survey battery. The DCI exhibited good internal reliability, discriminant validity, convergent validity, construct validity and concurrent validity. The final version containing 22-items, is self-administered, grounded in the theoretical literature and supported by initial psychometric evaluation. It has 10 items assessing compartmentalization, 10 items assessing detachment and two items examining valid responding. The DCI could detect compartmentalization and detachment, and was designed for clinical research and for screening patients.
虽然有证据表明存在两种截然不同的分离形式,但还没有专门设计的量表来区分它们。本研究描述了分离和分隔清单(DCI)的开发和验证。DCI 是根据分离理论、29 个现有分离量表和专家意见开发的。在对非临床参与者 89 人和临床参与者 105 人进行在线调查之前,进行了一项初步试点研究,评估了可读性,探讨了有效性并减少了项目。调查工具包中包括了分离体验量表(DES)、躯体化分离问卷(SDQ)和正念注意意识量表(MAAS)。DCI 表现出良好的内部一致性、判别有效性、收敛有效性、结构有效性和同时有效性。最终版本包含 22 个项目,可自我管理,基于理论文献,并得到初步心理计量评估的支持。它有 10 个项目评估分隔,10 个项目评估分离,还有两个项目评估有效反应。DCI 可以检测到分隔和分离,专为临床研究和筛选患者设计。