• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分离性障碍及其他精神病理学群体:通过躯体形式解离问卷(SDQ-20)探索差异。

Dissociative disorders and other psychopathological groups: exploring the differences through the Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire (SDQ-20).

作者信息

Amaral do Espirito Santo Helena Maria, Pio-Abreu José Luís

机构信息

Instituto Superior Miguel Torga, Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

Braz J Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;29(4):354-8. doi: 10.1590/s1516-44462006005000039. Epub 2008 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1590/s1516-44462006005000039
PMID:17713705
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire is a self-report questionnaire that has proven to be a reliable and valid instrument. The objectives of this study were to validate the Portuguese version and to determine its capability to distinguish patients with dissociative disorders from others with psychopathological disorders.

METHOD

234 patients answered the translated version of Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire. The Portuguese Dissociative Disorders Interview Schedule was used to validate clinical diagnosis. Patients with dissociative disorder (n = 113) were compared to a control group of 121 patients with various anxiety and depression disorders.

RESULTS

Reliability measured by Cronbach's a was 0.88. The best performance of the Portuguese form was at a cut-off point of 35, which distinguishes between dissociative disorder and neurotic disorders with a good diagnostic efficacy (sensitivity = 0.73). The somatoform dissociation was significantly more frequent in dissociative disorder patients, conversion disorder patients and post-traumatic stress disorder patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that dissociative disorders can be differentiated from other psychiatric disorders through somatoform dissociation. The Portuguese version of the Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire has fine psychometric features that sustain its cross-cultural validity.

摘要

目的

躯体形式解离问卷是一种自陈式问卷,已被证明是一种可靠且有效的工具。本研究的目的是验证葡萄牙语版本,并确定其区分解离性障碍患者与其他精神病理障碍患者的能力。

方法

234名患者回答了躯体形式解离问卷的翻译版本。使用葡萄牙语解离性障碍访谈量表来验证临床诊断。将解离性障碍患者(n = 113)与121名患有各种焦虑和抑郁障碍的对照组患者进行比较。

结果

用克朗巴哈系数测量的信度为0.88。葡萄牙语版本的最佳表现是在35分的分界点,该分界点能以良好的诊断效能区分解离性障碍和神经症性障碍(敏感性 = 0.73)。躯体形式解离在解离性障碍患者、转换障碍患者和创伤后应激障碍患者中明显更常见。

结论

这些发现表明,解离性障碍可以通过躯体形式解离与其他精神障碍相区分。躯体形式解离问卷的葡萄牙语版本具有良好的心理测量学特征,支持其跨文化效度。

相似文献

1
Dissociative disorders and other psychopathological groups: exploring the differences through the Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire (SDQ-20).分离性障碍及其他精神病理学群体:通过躯体形式解离问卷(SDQ-20)探索差异。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;29(4):354-8. doi: 10.1590/s1516-44462006005000039. Epub 2008 Jan 8.
2
Somatoform dissociation discriminates among diagnostic categories over and above general psychopathology.躯体形式解离在一般精神病理学之外的诊断类别中具有鉴别作用。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1999 Aug;33(4):511-20. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.1999.00601.x.
3
The validity and reliability of the German version of the Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire (SDQ-20).德文版躯体化分离问卷(SDQ-20)的有效性和可靠性。
J Trauma Dissociation. 2010;11(3):337-57. doi: 10.1080/15299731003793450.
4
Psychiatric symptoms and dissociation in conversion, somatization and dissociative disorders.转换障碍、躯体化障碍和解离障碍中的精神症状与解离
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;43(3):270-6. doi: 10.1080/00048670802653307.
5
The development of the somatoform dissociation questionnaire (SDQ-5) as a screening instrument for dissociative disorders.躯体形式解离问卷(SDQ - 5)作为解离性障碍筛查工具的开发。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997 Nov;96(5):311-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb09922.x.
6
The development and psychometric characteristics of the Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire (SDQ-20).躯体形式解离问卷(SDQ - 20)的编制及心理测量学特征
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1996 Nov;184(11):688-94. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199611000-00006.
7
[Hysteria, dissociation and conversion. A review of concepts, classification and diagnostic instruments].[癔症、分离障碍与转换障碍。概念、分类及诊断工具综述]
Psychiatr Prax. 1996 Mar;23(2):63-8.
8
Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire (SDQ-20).躯体形式解离问卷西班牙语版(SDQ - 20)的效度与信度。
Psicothema. 2017 May;29(2):275-280. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.346.
9
[Psychogenic non epileptic seizures: a review].[心因性非癫痫性发作:综述]
Encephale. 2011 Apr;37(2):153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2010.04.009. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
10
Psychometric characteristics of the somatoform dissociation questionnaire: a replication study.躯体形式解离问卷的心理测量学特征:一项重复研究。
Psychother Psychosom. 1998;67(1):17-23. doi: 10.1159/000012254.

引用本文的文献

1
Dissociation and its biological and clinical associations in functional neurological disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis.分离及其在功能性神经障碍中的生物学和临床关联:系统评价与荟萃分析
BJPsych Open. 2022 Dec 1;9(1):e2. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.597.
2
Somatoform Dissociative Symptoms Have No Impact on the Outcome of Trauma-Focused Treatment for Severe PTSD.躯体形式解离症状对严重创伤后应激障碍的创伤聚焦治疗结果没有影响。
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 7;10(8):1553. doi: 10.3390/jcm10081553.
3
Dissociative disorders in medical settings.医学环境中的分离性障碍。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2013 Oct;15(10):398. doi: 10.1007/s11920-013-0398-8.
4
Assessing medically unexplained symptoms: evaluation of a shortened version of the SOMS for use in primary care.评估无法用医学解释的症状:在初级保健中使用 SOMS 缩短版的评估。
BMC Psychiatry. 2010 May 17;10:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-10-34.