Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne Brain Centre, 245 Burgundy Street, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Brain. 2019 Jul 1;142(7):1973-1987. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz124.
Focal epilepsy is a unilateral brain network disorder, providing an ideal neuropathological model with which to study the effects of focal neural disruption on a range of cognitive processes. While language and memory functions have been extensively investigated in focal epilepsy, music cognition has received less attention, particularly in patients with music training or expertise. This represents a critical gap in the literature. A better understanding of the effects of epilepsy on music cognition may provide greater insight into the mechanisms behind disease- and training-related neuroplasticity, which may have implications for clinical practice. In this cross-sectional study, we comprehensively profiled music and non-music cognition in 107 participants; musicians with focal epilepsy (n = 35), non-musicians with focal epilepsy (n = 39), and healthy control musicians and non-musicians (n = 33). Parametric group comparisons revealed a specific impairment in verbal cognition in non-musicians with epilepsy but not musicians with epilepsy, compared to healthy musicians and non-musicians (P = 0.029). This suggests a possible neuroprotective effect of music training against the cognitive sequelae of focal epilepsy, and implicates potential training-related cognitive transfer that may be underpinned by enhancement of auditory processes primarily supported by temporo-frontal networks. Furthermore, our results showed that musicians with an earlier age of onset of music training performed better on a composite score of melodic learning and memory compared to non-musicians (P = 0.037), while late-onset musicians did not differ from non-musicians. For most composite scores of music cognition, although no significant group differences were observed, a similar trend was apparent. We discuss these key findings in the context of a proposed model of three interacting dimensions (disease status, music expertise, and cognitive domain), and their implications for clinical practice, music education, and music neuroscience research.
局灶性癫痫是一种单侧脑网络紊乱,为研究局灶性神经损伤对一系列认知过程的影响提供了理想的神经病理学模型。虽然在局灶性癫痫中已经广泛研究了语言和记忆功能,但音乐认知受到的关注较少,尤其是在具有音乐训练或专业知识的患者中。这是文献中的一个关键空白。更好地了解癫痫对音乐认知的影响可能会更深入地了解疾病和训练相关神经可塑性的机制,这可能对临床实践具有重要意义。在这项横断面研究中,我们全面分析了 107 名参与者的音乐和非音乐认知;局灶性癫痫的音乐家(n = 35)、局灶性癫痫的非音乐家(n = 39)、健康的音乐家和非音乐家对照组(n = 33)。参数组比较显示,与健康的音乐家和非音乐家相比,癫痫非音乐家的言语认知存在特异性损害,但癫痫音乐家没有(P = 0.029)。这表明音乐训练可能对局灶性癫痫的认知后果具有神经保护作用,并暗示了潜在的训练相关认知转移,这可能是由主要由颞额网络支持的听觉过程增强所支撑的。此外,我们的研究结果表明,音乐训练起始年龄较早的音乐家在旋律学习和记忆的综合评分上优于非音乐家(P = 0.037),而起始年龄较晚的音乐家与非音乐家没有差异。对于大多数音乐认知的综合评分,虽然没有观察到显著的组间差异,但出现了类似的趋势。我们在一个提出的三个相互作用维度(疾病状态、音乐专业知识和认知领域)的模型的背景下讨论了这些关键发现,并讨论了它们对临床实践、音乐教育和音乐神经科学研究的意义。