• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2016-2017 年美国糖尿病预防服务的提供和使用情况。

Reach and Use of Diabetes Prevention Services in the United States, 2016-2017.

机构信息

Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e193160. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3160.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3160
PMID:31074808
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6512285/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Coordinated efforts by national organizations in the United States to implement evidence-based lifestyle modification programs are under way to reduce type 2 diabetes (hereinafter referred to as diabetes) and cardiovascular risks.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a status report on the reach and use of diabetes prevention services nationally.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This nationally representative, population-based cross-sectional analysis of 2016 and 2017 National Health Interview Survey data was conducted from August 3, 2017, through November 15, 2018. Nonpregnant, noninstitutionalized, civilian respondents 18 years or older at high risk for diabetes, defined as those with no self-reported diabetes diagnosis but with diagnosed prediabetes or an elevated American Diabetes Association (ADA) risk score (>5), were included in the analysis. Analyses were conducted for adults with (and in sensitivity analyses, for those without) elevated body mass index.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Absolute numbers and proportions of adults at high risk with elevated body mass index receiving advice about diet, physical activity guidance, referral to weight loss programs, referral to diabetes prevention programs, or any of these, and those affirming engagement in each (or any) activity in the past year were estimated. To identify where gaps exist, a prevention continuum diagram plotted existing vs desired goal achievement. Variation in risk-reducing activities by age, sex, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, insurance status, history of gestational diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or body mass index was also examined.

RESULTS

This analysis included 50 912 respondents (representing 223.0 million adults nationally) 18 years or older (mean [SE] age, 46.1 [0.2] years; 48.1% [0.3%] male) with complete data and no self-reported diabetes diagnosis by their health care professional. Of the represented population, 36.0% (80.0 million) had either a physician diagnosis of prediabetes (17.9 million), an elevated ADA risk score (73.3 million), or both (11.3 million). Among those with diagnosed prediabetes, 73.5% (95% CI, 71.6%-75.3%) reported receiving advice and/or referrals for diabetes risk reduction from their health care professional, and, of those, 35.0% (95% CI, 30.5%-39.8%) to 75.8% (95% CI, 73.2%-78.3%) reported engaging in the respective activity or program in the past year. Half of adults with elevated ADA risk scores but no diagnosed prediabetes (50.6%; 95% CI, 49.5%-51.8%) reported receiving risk-reduction advice and/or referral, of whom 33.5% (95% CI, 30.1%-37.0%) to 75.2% (95% CI, 73.4%-76.9%) reported engaging in activities and/or programs. Participation in diabetes prevention programs was exceedingly low. Advice from a health care professional, age range from 45 to 64 years, higher educational attainment, health insurance status, gestational diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and obesity were associated with higher engagement in risk-reducing activities and/or programs.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among adults at high risk for diabetes, major gaps in receiving advice and/or referrals and engaging in diabetes risk-reduction activities and/or programs were noted. These results suggest that risk perception, health care professional referral and communication, and insurance coverage may be key levers to increase risk-reducing behaviors in US adults. These findings provide a benchmark from which to monitor future program availability and coverage, identification of prediabetes, and referral to and retention in programs.

摘要

重要性:美国国家组织正在共同努力实施基于证据的生活方式改变计划,以降低 2 型糖尿病(以下简称糖尿病)和心血管风险。

目的:提供全国范围内预防糖尿病服务的可及性和使用情况的现状报告。

设计、环境和参与者:这是一项全国代表性的基于人群的横断面分析,对 2016 年和 2017 年国家健康访谈调查数据进行了分析。调查于 2017 年 8 月 3 日至 2018 年 11 月 15 日进行。调查对象为患有糖尿病高风险(定义为没有自我报告的糖尿病诊断,但患有确诊的前期糖尿病或美国糖尿病协会(ADA)风险评分升高(>5)的非孕妇、非住院、非机构化的、18 岁及以上的平民受访者。分析包括(和在敏感性分析中,不包括)超重的成年人。

主要结果和措施:估计了具有升高体重指数的高风险成年人中接受关于饮食、体力活动指导、体重减轻计划转介、糖尿病预防计划转介或这些建议的任何建议的绝对人数和比例,以及那些在过去一年中肯定参与任何活动的人数和比例。为了确定存在哪些差距,绘制了现有的与预期目标达成情况的预防连续图。还检查了按年龄、性别、种族/族裔、教育程度、保险状况、妊娠糖尿病史、高血压或体重指数的风险降低活动的差异。

结论:在这项分析中,包括了 50912 名受访者(代表全国 22300 万成年人),年龄在 18 岁或以上(平均[标准差]年龄为 46.1[0.2]岁;48.1%[0.3%]为男性),有完整的数据且没有自我报告的由其保健专业人员诊断的糖尿病。在所代表的人群中,36.0%(8000 万人)有医生诊断的前期糖尿病(1790 万人)、升高的 ADA 风险评分(7330 万人)或两者兼有(1130 万人)。在患有确诊前期糖尿病的人群中,73.5%(95%可信区间,71.6%-75.3%)报告从他们的保健专业人员那里获得了糖尿病风险降低的建议和/或转介,其中 35.0%(95%可信区间,30.5%-39.8%)至 75.8%(95%可信区间,73.2%-78.3%)报告在过去一年中参与了各自的活动或计划。一半具有升高 ADA 风险评分但没有确诊前期糖尿病的成年人(50.6%;95%可信区间,49.5%-51.8%)报告接受了风险降低建议和/或转介,其中 33.5%(95%可信区间,30.1%-37.0%)至 75.2%(95%可信区间,73.4%-76.9%)报告在过去一年中参与了活动和/或计划。参与糖尿病预防计划的人数极低。来自保健专业人员的建议、45 岁至 64 岁年龄范围、较高的教育程度、医疗保险状况、妊娠糖尿病、高血压和肥胖与更高的风险降低活动和/或计划的参与度相关。

结论:在患有糖尿病高风险的成年人中,在接受建议和/或转介以及参与糖尿病风险降低活动和/或计划方面存在重大差距。这些结果表明,风险感知、保健专业人员的转介和沟通以及保险覆盖范围可能是增加美国成年人风险降低行为的关键杠杆。这些发现为监测未来的项目可用性和覆盖范围、识别前期糖尿病以及转介和保留在项目中提供了基准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9bc/6512285/9767c92fd8b9/jamanetwopen-2-e193160-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9bc/6512285/9767c92fd8b9/jamanetwopen-2-e193160-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9bc/6512285/9767c92fd8b9/jamanetwopen-2-e193160-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Reach and Use of Diabetes Prevention Services in the United States, 2016-2017.2016-2017 年美国糖尿病预防服务的提供和使用情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e193160. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3160.
2
Diabetes risk reduction behaviors among U.S. adults with prediabetes.美国糖尿病前期成年人的糖尿病风险降低行为。
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Apr;38(4):403-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.12.029.
3
Outcomes of health care providers' recommendations for healthy lifestyle among U.S. adults with prediabetes.美国成年人糖尿病前期患者健康生活方式建议对医护人员的影响。
Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2011 Jun;9(3):231-7. doi: 10.1089/met.2010.0112. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
4
Lifestyle behaviors and physician advice for change among overweight and obese adults with prediabetes and diabetes in the United States, 2006.美国超重和肥胖的糖尿病前期和糖尿病患者的生活方式行为和医生改变建议,2006 年。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2011 Nov;8(6):A132. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
5
6
Prevalence and Correlates of Diabetes Prevention Program Referral and Participation.糖尿病预防计划转诊和参与的流行率及相关因素。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Mar;56(3):452-457. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.10.005. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
7
National patterns in diabetes screening: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2012.糖尿病筛查的全国模式:来自2005 - 2012年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的数据。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 May;30(5):612-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3147-8. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
8
National Survey of Primary Care Physicians' Knowledge, Practices, and Perceptions of Prediabetes.全国初级保健医生对糖尿病前期的知识、实践和看法的调查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Nov;34(11):2475-2481. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05245-7. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
9
Prediabetes Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices at an Academic Family Medicine Practice.在学术家庭医疗实践中,糖尿病前期知识、态度和实践。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Jul-Aug;32(4):505-512. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180375.
10
Eye Care Among US Adults at High Risk for Vision Loss in the United States in 2002 and 2017.2002 年和 2017 年美国视力丧失高危成年人的眼部保健情况。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 May 1;138(5):479-489. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.0273.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic value of elevated postoperative high-sensitivity troponin T in diabetes mellitus patients for ischemic events within 12 months after PCI in ACS patients: a retrospective cohort study.糖尿病患者术后高敏肌钙蛋白T升高对急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后12个月内缺血事件的预后价值:一项回顾性队列研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jun 27;12:1606435. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1606435. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing the Fit of a Digitally Delivered National Diabetes Prevention Program Among Rural Living Adults: Qualitative Study.评估数字交付的国家糖尿病预防计划在农村成年人中的适配性:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 2;9:e70406. doi: 10.2196/70406.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Advancing Health Policy and Program Research in Diabetes: Findings from the Natural Experiments for Translation in Diabetes (NEXT-D) Network.推进糖尿病卫生政策和项目研究:来自糖尿病转化自然实验(NEXT-D)网络的研究结果。
Curr Diab Rep. 2018 Nov 20;18(12):146. doi: 10.1007/s11892-018-1112-3.
2
Behavioral Weight Loss Interventions to Prevent Obesity-Related Morbidity and Mortality in Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.行为体重管理干预以预防成年人肥胖相关的发病率和死亡率:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2018 Sep 18;320(11):1163-1171. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13022.
3
Global Diabetes Prevention Interventions: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Real-World Impact on Incidence, Weight, and Glucose.
Engagement in the National Diabetes Prevention Program Among Hispanic Men.
西班牙裔男性参与国家糖尿病预防计划的情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2515046. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.15046.
4
Impact of an adapted diabetes prevention program in a spanish primary care setting: protocol for a type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster-randomized trial (ALADIM).一项适应性糖尿病预防计划在西班牙初级保健机构中的影响:一项II型混合有效性-实施整群随机试验(ALADIM)的方案
Implement Sci. 2025 Jun 2;20(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01438-3.
5
Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and travel time to diabetes prevention programs in Maryland.马里兰州社区社会经济劣势与前往糖尿病预防项目的出行时间
Health Place. 2025 Jul;94:103470. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2025.103470. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
6
Is the Current Lifestyle Modification Approach to Diabetes Prevention in the U.S. a Success?美国目前通过生活方式改变预防糖尿病的方法成功了吗?
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jun 1;48(6):863-870. doi: 10.2337/dci24-0040.
7
Ultra-processed food consumption among adults with prediabetes and diabetes, 2001-2018.2001年至2018年糖尿病前期和糖尿病成年人的超加工食品消费情况
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jul;27(7):3840-3847. doi: 10.1111/dom.16411. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
8
A randomized controlled trial of an acceptance and commitment therapy-informed diabetes prevention program reduces body shame and distress.一项基于接受与承诺疗法的糖尿病预防项目的随机对照试验可减轻身体羞耻感和痛苦。
Health Psychol. 2025 May;44(5):549-559. doi: 10.1037/hea0001434.
9
Healthcare workers' perspectives on barriers and facilitators to referral to type 2 diabetes prevention programmes: a systematic review.医护人员对转诊至2型糖尿病预防项目的障碍和促进因素的看法:一项系统综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 7;15(3):e090105. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090105.
10
From inequalities to solutions: an explanatory sequential study on type 2 diabetes health services utilization.从不平等到解决方案:关于2型糖尿病健康服务利用的解释性序列研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 3;25(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12222-w.
全球糖尿病预防干预措施:基于真实世界数据的发病率、体重和血糖影响的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jul;41(7):1526-1534. doi: 10.2337/dc17-2222.
4
Primary Care Providers' Prediabetes Screening, Testing, and Referral Behaviors.基层医疗保健提供者的糖尿病前期筛查、检测和转介行为。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Aug;55(2):e39-e47. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
5
Financial incentive strategies for maintenance of weight loss: results from an internet-based randomized controlled trial.基于互联网的随机对照试验对维持减肥效果的财务激励策略:结果。
Nutr Diabetes. 2018 May 25;8(1):33. doi: 10.1038/s41387-018-0036-y.
6
Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2017.2017 年美国糖尿病的经济成本。
Diabetes Care. 2018 May;41(5):917-928. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0007. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
7
Cardiovascular and renal burdens of prediabetes in the USA: analysis of data from serial cross-sectional surveys, 1988-2014.美国糖尿病前期的心血管和肾脏负担:1988-2014 年连续横断面调查数据分析。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 May;6(5):392-403. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30027-5. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
8
5. Prevention or Delay of Type 2 Diabetes: .5. 2 型糖尿病的预防或延迟: 。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S51-S54. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S005.
9
Long-term Sustainability of Diabetes Prevention Approaches: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.长期可持续性的糖尿病预防方法:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Dec 1;177(12):1808-1817. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.6040.
10
Survey of primary care providers' knowledge of screening for, diagnosing and managing prediabetes.初级保健提供者对糖尿病前期的筛查、诊断和管理的知识调查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Nov;32(11):1172-1178. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4103-1. Epub 2017 Jul 20.